About the site changes

LIFE · #1 by **LIFE** » Oct 28, 2010 3:11 pm

Turns out I'm not having enough time to give a complete website relaunch the attention it needs.
So what I'm going to do instead is improving the site with a gradual, incremental approach.

Of couse there will be a new logo (soon :naughty2:

), of course there will be new areas such as for the article repository but instead of a complete switch that'll probably just confuse everybody I'll make some changes here and there that'll eventually lead to the idea we initially had in our heads.

I can arrange my available free time better this way and it'll also reduce the amount of time needed for bug-fixing and overall testing.

Hope that is fine with you too :dopey:

Cheers

Bernhard

campermon · #2 by **campermon** » Oct 28, 2010 3:12 pm

LIFE wrote:...... a complete website relaunch .......

Where have I heard that before? :ask:

Tbickle · #3 by **Tbickle** » Oct 28, 2010 3:13 pm

Thanks for the update and I look forward to seeing the changes!

Sityl · #4 by **Sityl** » Oct 28, 2010 3:13 pm

I'm very excited about these new changes.

z8000783 · #5 by **z8000783** » Oct 28, 2010 4:46 pm

LIFE wrote:Turns out I'm not having enough time to give a complete website relaunch the attention it needs.
So what I'm going to do instead is improving the site with a gradual, incremental approach.

Of couse there will be a new logo (soon ), of course there will be new areas such as for the article repository but instead of a complete switch that'll probably just confuse everybody I'll make some changes here and there that'll eventually lead to the idea we initially had in our heads.

I can arrange my available free time better this way and it'll also reduce the amount of time needed for bug-fixing and overall testing.

Hope that is fine with you too

Cheers
Bernhard

Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

CJ · #6 by CJ » Oct 28, 2010 5:01 pm

The place is working well so just keep the updates coming as and when you have time!!

HughMcB · #7 by **HughMcB** » Oct 28, 2010 5:16 pm

z8000783 wrote:Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

Nora_Leonard · #8 by **Nora_Leonard** » Oct 28, 2010 5:17 pm

CJ wrote:The place is working well so just keep the updates coming as and when you have time!!

+1

LarianLeQuella · #9 by **LarianLeQuella** » Oct 28, 2010 6:08 pm

LIFE wrote: (soon )

I thought that word was spelled "SoonTM" (Quotes included). :cheers:

vsop44 · **#10** by **vsop44** » Oct 28, 2010 6:14 pm

What's wrong with "if it ain't broke ,don't fix it ! " :roll:

Thanks for all your hard work Life ! :clap:

Mazille · **#11** by **Mazille** » Oct 28, 2010 6:16 pm

LarianLeQuella wrote:
LIFE wrote: (soon )

I thought that word was spelled "SoonTM" (Quotes included).

Ah, another of those people on whose soul WAR left a scar? :coffee:

z8000783 wrote:
Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

Indeed. Those bastards. :lay:

Spartacus

j.mills · **#12** by **j.mills** » Oct 28, 2010 6:30 pm

^ You're Spartacus? I thought I was. :ask:

Cheers, Mr LIFE! :cheers:

byofrcs · **#13** by **byofrcs** » Oct 29, 2010 7:47 am

Could one of the little incremental changes be to reduce the height of the banner ? div.logo-image is 274px. That's 45% of a typical Netbook 1024x600 display and 35% of my laptop.

virphen · **#14** by **virphen** » Oct 29, 2010 8:27 am

LIFE wrote:
Hope that is fine with you too

No, it's not good enough.

I think you should resign as admin, we can replace you with a bloke who has just left the RDF site, he did a fantastic job there.

z8000783 · **#15** by **z8000783** » Oct 29, 2010 8:36 am

LIFE is also the owner so the court submission where he sues himself should make interesting reading.

John

starr · **#16** by **starr** » Oct 29, 2010 9:36 am

z8000783 wrote:
Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

I think I'm the only moderator with wings.... :waah:

CJ · **#17** by CJ » Oct 29, 2010 9:38 am

starr wrote:
z8000783 wrote:
Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

I think I'm the only moderator with wings....

Is that Johns head in your hand :grin:

z8000783 · **#18** by **z8000783** » Oct 29, 2010 9:59 am

starr wrote:I think I'm the only moderator with wings....

See what I mean? It's relentless.

John

Calilasseia · **#19** by **Calilasseia** » Oct 29, 2010 8:34 pm

starr wrote:
z8000783 wrote:
Do it however you like mate, it'll be great whatever approach is taken just so long as you sack all these winging moderators.

John

I think I'm the only moderator with wings....

You forgot me.

pensioner · **#20** by **pensioner** » Oct 29, 2010 8:39 pm

Don't forget to delete all Mazille's posts he will be so exited.