http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16859421

"In a land of faith and flag, Justin Griffith is challenging the US military to abandon its religious ties."

That's a fascinating article becuase of the picture it paints of the US military. It almost sounds like a nation-state unto itself.

TBH I find that a bit weird, Not sure it's "wrong", and given the US military budget and manpower understandable (it is bigger than many countries), but to these eyes it's very, very odd.

Tortured_Genius wrote:That's a fascinating article becuase of the picture it paints of the US military. It almost sounds like a nation-state unto itself.

TBH I find that a bit weird, Not sure it's "wrong", and given the US military budget and manpower understandable (it is bigger than many countries), but to these eyes it's very, very odd.

Yes, weird indeed.
But then, the military will use anyone of any faith or non-faith as cannon-fodder at times of necessity...

Edit: 'use'

Always thought it must be easier getting yourself killed if you think you are immortal but I suspect even in religious people they tend to start doubting that very fast when people starting shooting are you

MacIver wrote:THERE ARE NO ATHEISTS IN THE FOXHOLES!!!

Never understood that phrase to mean , to me its a positive statement about atheists

I think it means that even a "so called" atheist would pray to God if his or her life was in immediate danger.

I prefer the atheist wouldnt be stupid enough to get in a situation where he needed a foxhole in the first place

No army can embrace atheists, individuals can be atheist in the army and raise in rank but army need belief and faith to deceive masses for violence.

I don't really like the theme that's appearing in this thread.

Atheists can be just as idiotic as theists. And I don't believe idiocy is a requirement to serve in the military.

Mr Griffith counts about 100 members in Fort Bragg's atheist community, which meets weekly off-base, since it is not yet recognised as a distinctive faith group by the military.

Would someone help me with this please! My brain just seized up!

Clive Durdle wrote:

Mr Griffith counts about 100 members in Fort Bragg's atheist community, which meets weekly off-base, since it is not yet recognised as a distinctive faith group by the military.

Would someone help me with this please! My brain just seized up!

Ditto! An atheist group is a faith group??

I would think that atheists meet to espouse rational thinking (and any perceived threat to their way of thinking) and are completely amorphous with respect to faith groups (who only meet because their faith tells them to).

Clive Durdle wrote:

Mr Griffith counts about 100 members in Fort Bragg's atheist community, which meets weekly off-base, since it is not yet recognised as a distinctive faith group by the military.

Would someone help me with this please! My brain just seized up!

The Chaplains get to determine who can use on-post facilities for anything remotely related to religion. The Bragg Chaplaincy has been on their collective asses when it comes to issuing the requisite approval to SGT Griffith's group.

ali_ihsan21 wrote:No army can embrace atheists, individuals can be atheist in the army and raise in rank but army need belief and faith to deceive masses for violence.

As a retired career Soldier, I completely disagree with you.

The US Army doesn't "deceive masses for violence". Faith and belief may enter into some individual's reasons for enlisting and for fighting when called, but not most.