Moderators: Calilasseia, Mazille




Zwaarddijk wrote:at times some of the wordings he used sounded a bit pseudoscientific, altho' this might just be the result of the presentation. I am sure the applications and actual science behind the results is valid, and I am writing this like six hours after actually watching the video. this summary of my position is basically mostly a reminder to myself to explain and specify what about his wording I find odd, and I promise to do so tomorrow or the day after that, and also to find out whether anyone else had the same kind of reacting to it.





lucaspa wrote:Is there any process in nature that is going to make these polyoxometalates or produce the spheres?
I noticed this paragraph: "Cronin and his team begin by creating salts from negatively charged ions of the large metal oxides bound to a small positively charged ion such as hydrogen or sodium. A solution of this salt is squirted into another salt solution made of large, positively charged organic ions bound to small negative ones." That's 2 separate salt solutions and a process to squirt one into another. Is there any process in nature that would do this?
While I think the work is fun and interesting, it is a future poster-child for Intelligent Design.

Sovereign wrote:Not that I'm aware of but Calilasseia may know. I do know of hypothesis of origin in ice and origin in porous rock as those environments could keep reagents in good concentration and could build organic molecules needed for life. You're right though, ID could try to hijack this for themselves but I doubt that since they would be giving up position in order to use it imo.


Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest