LOL.

Will this do?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enlightenment

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:LOL.

Will this do?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enlightenment

Regards
DL

Which of the 3?

Thanks for that.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:

willhud9 wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:who has claimed he has undergone apotheosis and therefore possess divine knowledge and is in fact, a god himself.

Go away.

Regards
DL

There you go again. Bullshitting a definition. Apotheosis HAS a definition. If you wish to call it something else do so, because all you are doing by calling it apotheosis is spreading confusion. Even the fucking word apotheosis MEANS to make divine. ἀποθεοῦν is the verb. The noun is derived from that.

Get the quote where I, according to you, say that I possess divine knowledge, or be seen as the liar you are.

Regards
DL

I did not say you claimed that. I said you claimed to have undergone apotheosis. Multiple times. Apotheosis has it's own definition. This is case number two where you have weedled out of a straight reply.

More lies. "Multiple times."

Regards
DL

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:LOL.

Will this do?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enlightenment

Regards
DL

Which of the 3?

Greatest I am wrote:More lies. "Multiple times."

Regards
DL

...you just claimed you experienced apotheosis in this very thread.

willhud9 wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:More lies. "Multiple times."

Regards
DL

...you just claimed you experienced apotheosis in this very thread.

Indeed. Not multiple times.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:

willhud9 wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:More lies. "Multiple times."

Regards
DL

...you just claimed you experienced apotheosis in this very thread.

Indeed. Not multiple times.

Regards
DL

and you've also said it in earlier threads. Or have you forgotten that you have made other threads.

Done here.

Regards
DL

Until your next spam thread.

Is it? Not really, i really am worth it.

People dont get less egotistical than me. The only people who are more egotistical, usually come with a title, like...Priest, Imam, Pastor, Guru....Etc.

Now the-ms egotists! Who, not coincidentally, make money out of pretending not to be! Yes! They do care for you...So long as you pander to their ego...And, give them money! That helps their ego, why wouldn't it?

Its a business, with promotions, wage rises, bigger pensions, bigger retirement homes, the further up you claw your way. They, religions, are nothing more than corporations, vying for a monopoly.

Willing to lie about, demonise or kill anyone in their way. Including each other. Clerical history, the most perverted, violent history over time, humanity has had to contend with.

Why do we put up with them?

Yup, that's right! They promise milk and honey, virgins galore (when we die) for everyone , who pays them today! They fooking know no ones going to come back and complain under the goods descriptions act.

This has to be the most amateur con-trick...Ever. Yet people, still fall for it...Why?

It feels good. Unfortunately. It is their crutch in a world that most think they cannot effect.
The likely root of religion is our tribal instincts.
People need fellowship so much that they do not mind putting their intelligence aside.
Insecurity is a big player as well.

Regards
DL

So Sky Fairy fan clubs are a bad thing. Ok... In that case it might be a good idea to suggest to people who make unsupported claims that they communicate with these things to keep their claims to themselves.

BlackBart wrote:So Sky Fairy fan clubs are a bad thing. Ok... In that case it might be a good idea to suggest to people who make unsupported claims that they communicate with these things to keep their claims to themselves.

Why do you fear such claims?

I see them as an opportunity, not for belief, but for thought that are out of the usual box and sometimes even interesting.

Sure, none of us like it when unsupported statements are pushed hard at us but I see nothing wrong with the information as an anecdotal rendering which is what I call whatever I say that has no support.

Take it or leave it. To fight it like a fool is, foolish.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:

BlackBart wrote:So Sky Fairy fan clubs are a bad thing. Ok... In that case it might be a good idea to suggest to people who make unsupported claims that they communicate with these things to keep their claims to themselves.

Why do you fear such claims?

I don't. They disgust me.They disgust me because people use these baseless assertions to support their empty assertions - hence the Sky Fairy fan clubs used to fleece people of their freedom and money.

I see them as an opportunity, not for belief, but for thought that are out of the usual box and sometimes even interesting.

Without actual evidence, they're merely assertion. And thoughts based on assertion are worthless.

Sure, none of us like it when unsupported statements are pushed hard at us but I see nothing wrong with the information as an anecdotal rendering which is what I call whatever I say that has no support.

You want oil on that word salad?

Take it or leave it. To fight it like a fool is, foolish.

Thanks for your assertion based thoughts.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:Thanks for your assertion based thoughts.

Regards
DL

Except my assertions are supported. Religions based on deities for which there is no evidence can and do limit people freedoms.

And perhaps you'd like to enlighten us how we differentiate unsupported anecdotes from worthless lies or delusions?

BlackBart wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:Thanks for your assertion based thoughts.

Regards
DL

Except my assertions are supported. Religions based on deities for which there is no evidence can and do limit people freedoms.

And perhaps you'd like to enlighten us how we differentiate unsupported anecdotes from worthless lies or delusions?

I can only give an anecdotal answer.

Most unsupported anecdotes do not tell you that if you do not believe them you will go to hell.
The worthless lies and delusions will do something close to that.

Regards
DL