Jesus said...

Sermon on the Mount

Abrahamic religion, you know, the one with the cross...

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Jesus said...

#21  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 1:27 pm

igorfrankensteen wrote:I can't directly help you either, not being religious, despite having religious parents (Christian variations). I only want to point something out (in case you haven't assumed it), from my Historian's discipline side of things.

That is, that the nature of all systems of belief based on old writings follow one common pattern. Whether you talk religion, or economic systems, or political systems, you name it.

Once the writings are declared to be "holy," or in anyway uniquely clever, the reason why they are quoted is no longer just because they contain insight, as much as it is because they are considered to be magically authoritative. Once that happens, people who use them, very often begin to reinterpret what they want everyone to think they mean, so as to apply them like a clever pry bar of sorts to whatever current goals they are trying to achieve.

...

My point is, that the key to understanding each believers interpretation of such things, isn't to focus on the exact meaning of the words themselves, even in their original historical context. The key is to study the current life and motivations and agenda, if you will, of the person who is trying to apply them to their and your own life.


The key to understanding what Jesus was going on about is to have the experience for yourself (but I don't recommend this :nono: as it is dangerous, very dangerous) - then you'll know and won't be stumbling over meanings of words.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#22  Postby Skinny Puppy » Mar 17, 2015 1:28 pm

Alan B wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:Blessed are they that empty themselves of evil thoughts and deeds and forfeit the desires of the world for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

That gels with the way I'm thinking.
Nothing to do with 'material poverty'.
The Bibles I have are The New English Bible (NEB) and the later version with minor corrections, The Revised English Bible (REB). (I also have the KJV - everyone has one of those, except Cali, of course :P )

In the REB the first Beatitude: "Blessed are the poor in spirit the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs" remains similar to most other version of the Bible, However, in Luke 6:20 where many versions are similar to the KJV: "Blessed be ye poor: for yours is the Kingdom of God" - with accent on 'poor' - the REB states:
"Blessed are you who are in need, the Kingdom of God is yours". The REB appears to have changed the context to differentiate between 'poor in spirit' and 'poor in material wealth'. Hence the question.
What I have also just noticed are the two phrases 'Kingdom of Heaven' and 'Kingdom of God'. Are they the same? That may be a naive question to some 'dyed in the wool' theists, but the difference is there.

Also note: the NEB "...was a new translation from the ancient texts..." and the REB had the RCC on its advisory council.


Yes the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of god are one and the same.

In Revelation 21 there’s a description of the new heaven and the new earth (the kingdom) that Jesus spoke about on quite a few occasions.

Regarding poor people in the sense of being poor in its normal use.
It would appear at first glance of some scriptures that poor people automatically enter into heaven. That’s not so, it’s simply easier for them since they don’t have the trappings (temptations) that a rich man would face.

Jesus did say:
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

(The ‘eye of a needle’ isn’t a sewing needle as some people think.)

Rich people can go to heaven too; even the most vilified person on the face of the earth can go as long as they’re born again. Even Hitler, had he confessed and accepted Jesus, could have gone. There is nothing (sin) one could have done that can prevent one from entering the kingdom once you’re born again. (Except one sin that can’t be forgiven.)

While Jesus drew heavily on the OT when he spoke, basically one can safely disregard the OT and just use the NT. Jesus came to fulfill the law therefore his word supersedes all else.

As far as different versions of the bible are concerned, I have (I believe) every single one of them. I also have access to the original Greek and Hebrew texts, but I use the KJV since I like its use of language.

The RCC is a bastardized version of Christianity and was considered to be a sect by us since they simply make-up/interpret scriptures to suit their concept that they are the one true church.
User avatar
Skinny Puppy
 
Name: Sherlock Jeffrey Puppy
Posts: 9399
Age: 40
Male

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#23  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 1:43 pm

Skinny Puppy wrote:
Alan B wrote:"Blessed are the poor in spirit..."

What exactly is meant by "poor in spirit"?

Perhaps one or two of the resident Christians here could enlighten me. :ask:


It’s an odd passage in that it isn’t what it at first appears to be. I’m an ex-Pentecostal by the way.

Basically mankind is filled with sin in both thought and deed. Therefore mankind would be ‘rich’ in spirit (the spirit is you) if his only concern is for himself, friends, wealth etc. (Just as a note: rich in spirit is in the context of this verse, it can be used for other meanings.)

If one becomes like a child; pure in mind and incapable of doing evil, then one is ‘poor’ in spirit (because you’re lacking the evil that was within you).

In this sense ‘poor’ means to be lacking in the things that make man evil. Then and only then can the spirit of God (Holy Spirit) enter into you and you become a child of God and go to heaven.

To re-write that passage in modern terms could go like this:

Blessed are they that empty themselves of evil thoughts and deeds and forfeit the desires of the world for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.


I think we're on the same track but my experience of children, even rather young children is that they are perfectly capable of doing evil. I think Jesus had a bit of an idealized child in mind when he referenced them.

My interpretation is closest to your statement:

Therefore mankind would be ‘rich’ in spirit (the spirit is you) if his only concern is for himself, friends, wealth etc.


I would say we only truly put those aside when our ego is diminished, a modern term used by some is ego death. I don't however, think that we can simply will this, or make a conscious choice to make this happen ourselves, it's more the result, of a lot of choices we make, which allows the grace of G to work.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#24  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 1:55 pm

Alan B wrote:From your Wiki link: Ego death = "complete loss of subjective self-identity."

I cannot equate that with 'poor in spirit' in the context of the Sermon on the Mount. It seems a pretty drastic state of mind to be in so that one can reach the 'Kingdom of Heaven' - whatever that is! :scratch:


Ahhhhh. Indeed, a very "drastic state of mind", and a rather dangerous one. Were you thinking it was easier to reach heaven?

Heaven is a state of being, i.e. the kingdom of God is within you, i.e. it's not something that can be observed, and people won't say it's here or there. (paraphrased from Luke 17:20-21
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#25  Postby Sendraks » Mar 17, 2015 2:03 pm

John Platko wrote:The key to understanding what Jesus was going on about is to have the experience for yourself (but I don't recommend this :nono: as it is dangerous, very dangerous) - then you'll know and won't be stumbling over meanings of words.


Why is it dangerous?
"One of the great tragedies of mankind is that morality has been hijacked by religion." - Arthur C Clarke

"'Science doesn't know everything' - Well science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop" - Dara O'Brian
User avatar
Sendraks
 
Name: D-Money Jr
Posts: 15260
Age: 107
Male

Country: England
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#26  Postby Skinny Puppy » Mar 17, 2015 2:05 pm

John Platko wrote:
I think we're on the same track but my experience of children, even rather young children is that they are perfectly capable of doing evil. I think Jesus had a bit of an idealized child in mind when he referenced them.

I think we’re in agreement on this. Jesus really meant ‘child-like’ since he was speaking in generalities and for the most part children are innocent or perceived to be.

John Platko wrote:
My interpretation is closest to your statement:

Skinny Puppy wrote:
Therefore mankind would be ‘rich’ in spirit (the spirit is you) if his only concern is for himself, friends, wealth etc.

John Platko wrote:
I would say we only truly put those aside when our ego is diminished, a modern term used by some is ego death.

While ‘ego’ is a modern term (Freud) I have no qualms with its use. It basically encapsulates a modernistic view of our mind... or spirit.

John Platko wrote:
I don't however, think that we can simply will this, or make a conscious choice to make this happen ourselves, it's more the result, of a lot of choices we make, which allows the grace of G to work

That’s a difficult one to answer in a few words! One must be drawn to God and that is usually done by an intermediary who works on His behalf (those that minister or spread the word for God). The ‘calling’ happens within one, but needs an external source to bring it to the fore, so yes, it’s through the grace of God that one heeds and accepts the message.
User avatar
Skinny Puppy
 
Name: Sherlock Jeffrey Puppy
Posts: 9399
Age: 40
Male

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#27  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 3:54 pm

Sendraks wrote:
John Platko wrote:The key to understanding what Jesus was going on about is to have the experience for yourself (but I don't recommend this :nono: as it is dangerous, very dangerous) - then you'll know and won't be stumbling over meanings of words.


Why is it dangerous?


That's rather difficult to explain, I think largely because it's difficult to explain what the experience of loss of ego or "poor spirit" is actually like. Carl Jung tries pretty hard to do so but he invents a language to do it and that's problematic too.

But I'll give it a go and try to just describe the experience using standard language.

Imagine that in a very short period of time (on the order of months or much less) your entire view of the world, your view of reality, and your view of yourself shifted. What you used to value you no longer value because it no longer seems important in the big picture that you now believe you see. And along with this change of your view of reality comes a euphoric feeling. You feel connected to everything and everyone. Your identity is no longer yourself but your identity is part of all - all is one. And this all is one is not just words but you actually believe this - this has now become your reality. This reality shift is so sudden and large, and strange that you're not sure what happened. You try to sus out what's going on. You even wonder if you died. You wonder if you're dying. In a way you have died, at least a part of you psyche has died - you are not the person you were. But reality hasn't changed. The people around you haven't changed. You find yourself now, all of a sudden, seeing life in a very different way than everyone around you. You feel quite alone while knowing that you are connected with all. You feel protected by this euphoric feeling. You feel intense love from - well you imagine it must be God (sort of like Natalie did in the Derren Brown video).

This new view of the world you have is so different that you start to question everything about your old view. You're now like a young child, exploring the world, questioning everything, asking why. Sometimes you get answers, sometimes you don't. But some of the answers you get only reinforce this change. If you're lucky, you know how to test to see if the answers you get are good, if you don't, you're in a state that has left you very vulnerable.

Since we're in the Christian section of the forum I'll relate this to Jesus. He had just been baptized, he saw heaven open up and the Holy Spirit came upon him and he heard the voice of God saying this is my son who I love and with whom I am pleased.

Then Jesus goes off in the desert and among other things had to fight off "temptations", in the state of mind he was in he was tempted to jump off a cliff and rely on God to save him. And that is a very real and tangible example of the kind of danger this ego loss state can create - and there are others. Jesus was well prepared for this experience and he survived the desert but then he had to return to the rest of the world.

And that brought a different kind of danger, his egoless state pit him against many, his world view was unlike that of most. His ideas created dissonance in the minds of many, they saw him as a virus that must be eliminated, - a very dangerous position to be in.

I think there's a very good reason why more people don't follow in his footsteps, I think most would end up in a psycho ward or actually dead- and the rest would end up feeling very alone, which carries a danger of its own.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#28  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 4:04 pm

Skinny Puppy wrote:
John Platko wrote:
I think we're on the same track but my experience of children, even rather young children is that they are perfectly capable of doing evil. I think Jesus had a bit of an idealized child in mind when he referenced them.

I think we’re in agreement on this. Jesus really meant ‘child-like’ since he was speaking in generalities and for the most part children are innocent or perceived to be.


Yes, that how I interpret it too.



John Platko wrote:
My interpretation is closest to your statement:

Skinny Puppy wrote:
Therefore mankind would be ‘rich’ in spirit (the spirit is you) if his only concern is for himself, friends, wealth etc.

John Platko wrote:
I would say we only truly put those aside when our ego is diminished, a modern term used by some is ego death.

While ‘ego’ is a modern term (Freud) I have no qualms with its use. It basically encapsulates a modernistic view of our mind... or spirit.


Yes, and it has it's limitations. I think the language we have from Jesus has stood the test of time remarkably well but because of how some have misused what Jesus gave us those symbols are too loaded for some to deal with - that's very sad.



John Platko wrote:
I don't however, think that we can simply will this, or make a conscious choice to make this happen ourselves, it's more the result, of a lot of choices we make, which allows the grace of G to work

That’s a difficult one to answer in a few words! One must be drawn to God and that is usually done by an intermediary who works on His behalf (those that minister or spread the word for God). The ‘calling’ happens within one, but needs an external source to bring it to the fore, so yes, it’s through the grace of God that one heeds and accepts the message.


To that I would only add that the "external source to bring it to the fore" may come in from unexpected and non traditional people and places. Carrying the archetypes of love and truth is what matters, not the title of the person.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#29  Postby Sendraks » Mar 17, 2015 4:06 pm

So not really dangerous at all to anyone of a rational mindset. We're already out there exploring the world, questioning everything, asking why.

The only people who seem to view this as dangerous and present a danger, are the religious types.
"One of the great tragedies of mankind is that morality has been hijacked by religion." - Arthur C Clarke

"'Science doesn't know everything' - Well science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop" - Dara O'Brian
User avatar
Sendraks
 
Name: D-Money Jr
Posts: 15260
Age: 107
Male

Country: England
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#30  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 4:20 pm

Sendraks wrote:So not really dangerous at all to anyone of a rational mindset. We're already out there exploring the world, questioning everything, asking why.

The only people who seem to view this as dangerous and present a danger, are the religious types.


The line between the rational and irrational get's very blurred in an egoless state. One can certainly question things from a safer distance from the irrational - which as I said, is probably best for most. I get sufficient exercise without having to risk a climb on Mt. Everest - however others are drawn to it - and they will have an experience that I will not.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#31  Postby Sendraks » Mar 17, 2015 4:22 pm

John Platko wrote:The line between the rational and irrational get's very blurred in an egoless state.


Can you provide evidence for how this is so?

John Platko wrote:I get sufficient exercise without having to risk a climb on Mt. Everest - however others are drawn to it - and they will have an experience that I will not.


Climbing Everest isn't about "the exercise."
"One of the great tragedies of mankind is that morality has been hijacked by religion." - Arthur C Clarke

"'Science doesn't know everything' - Well science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop" - Dara O'Brian
User avatar
Sendraks
 
Name: D-Money Jr
Posts: 15260
Age: 107
Male

Country: England
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#32  Postby John Platko » Mar 17, 2015 4:42 pm

Sendraks wrote:
John Platko wrote:The line between the rational and irrational get's very blurred in an egoless state.


Can you provide evidence for how this is so?


I'm not sure what kind of evidence you're looking for. I don't believe we are yet able to measure the actual extent of a persons "ego".

But even Jesus's family went about saying he was crazy.


John Platko wrote:I get sufficient exercise without having to risk a climb on Mt. Everest - however others are drawn to it - and they will have an experience that I will not.


Climbing Everest isn't about "the exercise."


What's it about?
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#33  Postby Skinny Puppy » Mar 17, 2015 7:01 pm

I only have a few moments right now... I’ll address this point and others later.

Some of what you’ve said I agree with, however, one point (for now) that I disagree with is this.

John Platko wrote:
You feel quite alone while knowing that you are connected with all. You feel protected by this euphoric feeling. You feel intense love... <snip>


The feeling is quite the opposite to loneliness. Not only are you now in fellowship with God (Jesus actually since He is our advocate before God) you also have others that are there to share your burdens and troubles. In addition, Jesus is always with you at your side. You can be alone, but you’re never really ‘alone’. It’s probably the most comforting thought one could ever have. There’s the old saying... ‘If God is for you who can be against you!

Knowing that death now has no meaning and that you are one of the chosen few is euphoric. There is now nothing in the world to fear and you never need to face any of life’s problems alone, ever again. In addition, one has their congregation to help them through thick and thin.

Being Pentecostal meant that we were a very tight-knit community and we looked out for each other and were all willing and eager to help whenever anyone needed it, both spiritually and physically. This is diametrically opposite to most churches where you might not even know the person sitting next to you.

Anyway, my time is up for now...
User avatar
Skinny Puppy
 
Name: Sherlock Jeffrey Puppy
Posts: 9399
Age: 40
Male

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#34  Postby Oldskeptic » Mar 17, 2015 9:25 pm

Alan B wrote:"Blessed are the poor in spirit..."

What exactly is meant by "poor in spirit"?

Perhaps one or two of the resident Christians here could enlighten me. :ask:


ptóchos
Strong's Concordance
ptóchos: (of one who crouches and cowers, hence) beggarly, poor
Original Word: πτωχός, ή, όν
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: ptóchos
Phonetic Spelling: (pto-khos')
Short Definition: poor, destitute
Definition: poor, destitute, spiritually poor, either in a good sense (humble devout persons) or bad.


I guessing it simply meant poor and humble.
There is nothing so absurd that some philosopher will not say it - Cicero.

Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
Oldskeptic
 
Posts: 7395
Age: 67
Male

Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#35  Postby Agrippina » Mar 18, 2015 4:46 am

I think it means "depressed." I would be depressed if I actually believed I was going to spend all of eternity with a bunch of sanctimonious people who'd don't nothing of real importance except to worship Jesus all their lives. Thanks but no thanks. I get enough depression from falling and hurting myself, I don't need that as well.
A mind without instruction can no more bear fruit than can a field, however fertile, without cultivation. - Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BCE - 43 BCE)
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 36924
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#36  Postby orpheus » Mar 18, 2015 6:10 am

Agrippina wrote:I think it means "depressed." I would be depressed if I actually believed I was going to spend all of eternity with a bunch of sanctimonious people who'd don't nothing of real importance except to worship Jesus all their lives. Thanks but no thanks. I get enough depression from falling and hurting myself, I don't need that as well.


No popcorn franchise up there either.

Hey Aggie, I'm getting a signed copy of your book, yes?

:thumbup:
“A way a lone a last a loved a long the”

—James Joyce
User avatar
orpheus
 
Posts: 7274
Age: 59
Male

Country: New York, USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#37  Postby Agrippina » Mar 18, 2015 7:19 am

orpheus wrote:
Agrippina wrote:I think it means "depressed." I would be depressed if I actually believed I was going to spend all of eternity with a bunch of sanctimonious people who'd don't nothing of real importance except to worship Jesus all their lives. Thanks but no thanks. I get enough depression from falling and hurting myself, I don't need that as well.


No popcorn franchise up there either.

Hey Aggie, I'm getting a signed copy of your book, yes?

:thumbup:


Of course. I hope a digital signature will do. I'm very excited about it. These people have offered to promote it.
A mind without instruction can no more bear fruit than can a field, however fertile, without cultivation. - Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BCE - 43 BCE)
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 36924
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#38  Postby Sendraks » Mar 18, 2015 11:13 am

John Platko wrote:I'm not sure what kind of evidence you're looking for. I don't believe we are yet able to measure the actual extent of a persons "ego".

But even Jesus's family went about saying he was crazy.


Right, so we've no evidence that it is dangerous. Coolio.

John Platko wrote:What's it about?

It's about climbing the highest mountain in the world. It's a pretty dangerous task and requires those undertaking it do have done the necessary preparation, which includes being fit enough for the task at hand.

You don't climb Everest "for the exercise." The exercise is already done by that point. You've already trained to get yourself fit enough to do the climb. If you're not fit enough, either you won't make it all the way or at worst, you'll die.

To put it another way,
You don't climb Everest to "get fit." You climb Everest because you "are fit."
"One of the great tragedies of mankind is that morality has been hijacked by religion." - Arthur C Clarke

"'Science doesn't know everything' - Well science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop" - Dara O'Brian
User avatar
Sendraks
 
Name: D-Money Jr
Posts: 15260
Age: 107
Male

Country: England
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#39  Postby MS2 » Mar 18, 2015 1:14 pm

Alan B wrote:
Skinny Puppy wrote:Blessed are they that empty themselves of evil thoughts and deeds and forfeit the desires of the world for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

That gels with the way I'm thinking.
Nothing to do with 'material poverty'.
The Bibles I have are The New English Bible (NEB) and the later version with minor corrections, The Revised English Bible (REB). (I also have the KJV - everyone has one of those, except Cali, of course :P )

In the REB the first Beatitude: "Blessed are the poor in spirit the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs" remains similar to most other version of the Bible, However, in Luke 6:20 where many versions are similar to the KJV: "Blessed be ye poor: for yours is the Kingdom of God" - with accent on 'poor' - the REB states:
"Blessed are you who are in need, the Kingdom of God is yours". The REB appears to have changed the context to differentiate between 'poor in spirit' and 'poor in material wealth'. Hence the question.
What I have also just noticed are the two phrases 'Kingdom of Heaven' and 'Kingdom of God'. Are they the same? That may be a naive question to some 'dyed in the wool' theists, but the difference is there.

Also note: the NEB "...was a new translation from the ancient texts..." and the REB had the RCC on its advisory council.


If we go with a historical-type interpretation, Jesus was predicting that the oppressed among the Jews would soon have their situation dramatically improved when Yahweh acted to throw out the Romans and bring in his own kingdom (ie the kingdom of God). This is reflected in Luke's version: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is [ie will be] the kingdom of God.' Matthew though, when writing his version, realised that the poor were still suffering and that the kingdom had not actually come, at least in a physical sense, eg with the overthrow of the Romans. So Matthew 'saves the day' by spiritualising the saying: and it becomes the spiritually poor who will be blessed, and the kingdom itself is 'of heaven', rather than one that will come about 'on earth'.
Mark
MS2
 
Posts: 1647
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Jesus said...

#40  Postby John Platko » Mar 18, 2015 1:28 pm

Sendraks wrote:
John Platko wrote:I'm not sure what kind of evidence you're looking for. I don't believe we are yet able to measure the actual extent of a persons "ego".

But even Jesus's family went about saying he was crazy.


Right, so we've no evidence that it is dangerous. Coolio.


Well if you want to dismiss testimonial evidence ... And by all means you're welcome to do the experiment yourself, if you can that is. Get yourself in a state of "ego death" or "poor in spirit" and report back and tell us what happened - if you can.
But I don't recommend it. :nono:



John Platko wrote:What's it about?

It's about climbing the highest mountain in the world. It's a pretty dangerous task and requires those undertaking it do have done the necessary preparation, which includes being fit enough for the task at hand.


Yes, I've seen some programs on TV about it. It seems these days a big part of the necessary preparation is to have enough money to pay the Sherpas to hall all the stuff you need to make the climb in luxury. It seems that the size of the ego of the people who engage in such things will preclude them from peeking into the kingdom of heaven.


You don't climb Everest "for the exercise." The exercise is already done by that point. You've already trained to get yourself fit enough to do the climb. If you're not fit enough, either you won't make it all the way or at worst, you'll die.

To put it another way,
You don't climb Everest to "get fit." You climb Everest because you "are fit."


It seems that the ones who are really fit in these modern climbs are the Sherpas! They do the heave lifting for others. I suspect JC had folks like these Sherpas in mind when he was making that speech about the poor in spirit.
I like to imagine ...
User avatar
John Platko
 
Name: John Platko
Posts: 9411
Male

Country: US
United States (us)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Christianity

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest