Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

paarsurrey · **#61** by **paarsurrey** » Jan 12, 2012 7:41 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
cavarka9 wrote:
evidence?

This photograph:

Methinks cavarka9 may just have missed the sarcasm! : )

When this photograph was taken?

2500 years or so ago.

I don't think photography existed on those times.

chairman bill · **#62** by **chairman bill** » Jan 12, 2012 7:44 pm

paarsurrey wrote:I don't thik photography existed on those times.

Too funny. Really, hilarious stuff.

Regina · **#63** by **Regina** » Jan 12, 2012 7:47 pm

chairman bill wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:I don't thik photography existed on those times.

Too funny. Really, hilarious stuff.

But he does have a point there, to be sure. :mrgreen:

Onyx8 · **#64** by **Onyx8** » Jan 12, 2012 9:45 pm

I think Jesus took it on His Instammatic Time Warping Kodak. Probably just something He picked up in Japan on His way to Hang out in a village in India now that all His earth-changing rhetoric Had been done.

crank · **#65** by **crank** » Jan 13, 2012 3:19 am

You sure he didn't use his Poloshroud SX-70?

Spearthrower · **#66** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 13, 2012 8:22 am

paarsurrey wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:

This photograph:

Methinks cavarka9 may just have missed the sarcasm! : )

When this photograph was taken?

2500 years or so ago.

I don't think photography existed on those times.

But you can see the photograph right there, and it's clearly Buddha - you accept that it's Buddha, right?

:naughty2:

chairman bill · **#67** by **chairman bill** » Jan 13, 2012 9:27 am

Looks like a ladyboy with very big ears

paarsurrey · **#68** by **paarsurrey** » Jan 13, 2012 12:21 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:

When this photograph was taken?

2500 years or so ago.

I don't think photography existed on those times.

But you can see the photograph right there, and it's clearly Buddha - you accept that it's Buddha, right?

It is just imagination; does not present the real Buddha.

chairman bill · **#69** by **chairman bill** » Jan 13, 2012 12:22 pm

paarsurrey wrote:It is just imagination; does not present the real Buddha.

No shit, Sherlock! With that sort of insight, we'll have to take you far more seriously in future.

paarsurrey · **#70** by **paarsurrey** » Jan 13, 2012 11:21 pm

The painting of the Buddha only shows the cultural thoughts of the region and of the point in time it was painted; it does not mean the Buddha had a beard or he did not have a beard; and Budda was not as white skinned as shown in the painting; in my opinion he was dark skinned as he had prophesied for the coming of a Bagwa Buddah or white Buddha much afterwards from him .

Spearthrower · **#71** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 14, 2012 12:05 pm

chairman bill wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:It is just imagination; does not present the real Buddha.

No shit, Sherlock! With that sort of insight, we'll have to take you far more seriously in future.

Formidable levels of rationality are at play here!

paarsurrey · **#72** by **paarsurrey** » Jan 14, 2012 12:35 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
cavarka9 wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:How does she know that it is the face of Jesus not the face of say Buddha?

Buddha didn't have a beard.

evidence?

This photograph:

Methinks cavarka9 may just have missed the sarcasm! : )

Please give the source of the painted image.

I think some Buddhist would have painted it and of course with a purpose; Buddha did not have a circle of light around him as shown in the image. It seems like the gospel writers wrote every book with an imaginative purpose in their mind and did not present the real Jesus in the books written by them; a mythical purpose. Similarly the Buddhists have defaced and did not present the real Buddha. Gospel writers painted Jesus with words a mythical Jesus; the same way the Buddhistic painter had painted a mythical Buddha.

Varangian · **#73** by **Varangian** » Jan 14, 2012 3:04 pm

chairman bill · **#74** by **chairman bill** » Jan 14, 2012 3:26 pm

paarsurrey wrote:I think some Buddhist would have painted it and of course with a purpose; Buddha did not have a circle of light around him as shown in the image. It seems like the gospel writers wrote every book with an imaginative purpose in their mind and did not present the real Jesus in the books written by them; a mythical purpose. Similarly the Buddhists have defaced and did not present the real Buddha. Gospel writers painted Jesus with words a mythical Jesus; the same way the Buddhistic painter had painted a mythical Buddha.

But what about those pictures of Mohammed? You know, the prophet who had a penchant for pre-pubescent girls.

Spearthrower · **#75** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 14, 2012 5:20 pm

paarsurrey wrote:
Please give the source of the painted image.

I think some Buddhist would have painted it and of course with a purpose; Buddha did not have a circle of light around him as shown in the image. It seems like the gospel writers wrote every book with an imaginative purpose in their mind and did not present the real Jesus in the books written by them; a mythical purpose. Similarly the Buddhists have defaced and did not present the real Buddha. Gospel writers painted Jesus with words a mythical Jesus; the same way the Buddhistic painter had painted a mythical Buddha.

BlackBart · **#76** by **BlackBart** » Jan 14, 2012 6:36 pm

paarsurrey wrote:
Please give the source of the painted image.

Why? What would be the significance of the source?

I think some Buddhist would have painted it and of course with a purpose;

Really? I thought it might have been painted by a Zoroastrian by accident.

Buddha did not have a circle of light around him as shown in the image.

Unless there was a source of light behind his head.

It seems like the gospel writers wrote every book with an imaginative purpose in their mind and did not present the real Jesus in the books written by them; a mythical purpose.

So you keep saying. You're pretty much preaching to the choir on this forum. But that doesn't mean any other religious claims get to be right by default. You've still got that mountain to climb.

Similarly the Buddhists have defaced and did not present the real Buddha. Gospel writers painted Jesus with words a mythical Jesus; the same way the Buddhistic painter had painted a mythical Buddha.

I love points. I love the wooshing noise they make as they sail over your head.

paarsurrey · **#77** by **paarsurrey** » Jan 15, 2012 1:28 pm

chairman bill wrote:
paarsurrey wrote:I think some Buddhist would have painted it and of course with a purpose; Buddha did not have a circle of light around him as shown in the image. It seems like the gospel writers wrote every book with an imaginative purpose in their mind and did not present the real Jesus in the books written by them; a mythical purpose. Similarly the Buddhists have defaced and did not present the real Buddha. Gospel writers painted Jesus with words a mythical Jesus; the same way the Buddhistic painter had painted a mythical Buddha.

But what about those pictures

We don't need pictures of Buddha, Moses or Jesus; we appreciate their good characters being messengers prophets of the Creator God; not their physical bodies .

Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Re: Woman sees face of Jesus in drying sock

Who is online