New 2020 Election Documentary

2000 Mules - by Dinesh DeSouza

Discussions on 9/11, moon landing etc.

Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip

Have you seen '2000 Mules'

Yes
2
18%
No
4
36%
I support the current things like bacon or cheese
5
45%
 
Total votes : 11

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#781  Postby mindhack » Jun 23, 2022 11:05 am

A sound decision, Blip! With the dirty mouthed meanie gone, and the honest researcher freed from bullying, the forum is now in a better place. Well done. Fuck this.
(Ignorance --> Mystery) < (Knowledge --> Awe)
mindhack
 
Name: Van Amerongen
Posts: 2779
Male

Country: Zuid-Holland
Netherlands (nl)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#782  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 11:31 am

His presence literally chases people away from fora. He is not here in good faith. I don’t know why, with such trolling, he is still here.
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#783  Postby Fenrir » Jun 23, 2022 12:22 pm

Self-inflicted head wound
Religion: it only fails when you test it.-Thunderf00t.
User avatar
Fenrir
 
Posts: 3765
Male

Country: Australia
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (gs)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#784  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 2:58 pm

DeSouza suggested that this was after these GOP folk watched 2000 Mules. ALMOST claiming his mockumentary was the cause.
Untitled-1.png
Untitled-1.png (425.28 KiB) Viewed 339 times


here is the Timcast version. (Mr. Norman makes no connection to the film)

https://timcast.com/news/texas-republic ... ification/
“We believe that the 2020 election violated Article 1 and 2 of the US Constitution, that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their elections in multiple ways, including by allowing ballots to be received after November 3, 2020,” the resolution reads. “We believe that substantial election fraud in key metropolitan areas significantly affected the results in five key states in favor of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.”

While some of the GOP lawmakers who met in Houston for the party’s annual state convention assert that the 2020 election was stolen, and others say there was no amount of fraud that would have changed the outcome, to date, claims of election fraud in the 2020 election have yet to be adjudicated in a court of law.
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#785  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 5:17 pm

D’Souzelusional
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#786  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 5:43 pm

felltoearth wrote:D’Souzelusional

He's the only one making the connection between his film, and this motion. At least as far as I can tell.

So while the motion seems legit, the marketing wank is strong with him
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#787  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 5:49 pm

The whole thing is a clown circus. They deserve each other. Whether there is a connection or not is irrelevant
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#788  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 5:56 pm

felltoearth wrote:The whole thing is a clown circus. They deserve each other. Whether there is a connection or not is irrelevant

Well, clown circus or no, the filmmakers are still threatening a third act.

A popular right-wing meme is about grabbing some popcorn and watching the show. It's a fun one. Works for either side, when justice is expected to be on parade.

:popcorn:
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#789  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 6:31 pm

Well, once again your posts are obtuse. I have no idea what you’re talking about


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#790  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 6:36 pm

felltoearth wrote:Well, once again your posts are obtuse. I have no idea what you’re talking about


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The filmmakers (the film this thread is about) have been 'teasing' about having another disclosure of some kind.

A 'third act' to their drama.

Or did you not get that popcorn is a current meme ?
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#791  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 6:41 pm

Popcorn isn’t a current meme. It’s quite old.

We even have our own emoticon :popcorn:

The rest was gibberish.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#792  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 6:47 pm

Of course you are right about the popcorn. It's an old meme that has surged in use among those watching Durham reveal his investigation results.

As to what you call 'gibberish', if you can say what you don't understand, I can try explaining it. If understanding was your goal, I mean.

Otherwise, the rest of your comment is, indeed, gibberish.
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#793  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 7:24 pm

I give others the benefit of the doubt. You, nope.

If you can’t be clear, that’s not my issue.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#794  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 8:38 pm

felltoearth wrote:I give others the benefit of the doubt. You, nope.

If you can’t be clear, that’s not my issue.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well, I believe you when you say you don't understand.

But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#795  Postby felltoearth » Jun 23, 2022 8:56 pm

When you demonstrate honesty in discussion, I will take this thread seriously.

Meanwhile

Image


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
"Walla Walla Bonga!" — Witticism
User avatar
felltoearth
 
Posts: 14664
Age: 54

Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#796  Postby Pudendum » Jun 23, 2022 9:07 pm

felltoearth wrote:When you demonstrate honesty in discussion, I will take this thread seriously.[


If you were willing to admit and clarify what you didn't understand, your opinion would mean more than gibberish to me.



Meanwhile

Image


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Does this relate to the movie somehow? Or something based off your earlier misunderstanding?
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#797  Postby THWOTH » Jun 24, 2022 2:43 pm

Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?
"No-one is exempt from speaking nonsense – the only misfortune is to do it solemnly."
Michel de Montaigne, Essais, 1580
User avatar
THWOTH
RS Donator
 
Posts: 37132
Age: 57

Country: Untied Kingdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#798  Postby Pudendum » Jun 24, 2022 3:27 pm

THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?


How would I know?
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#799  Postby THWOTH » Jun 24, 2022 3:46 pm

Pudendum wrote:
THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

How would I know?

Perhaps you have a neurological condition, one that causes you to instantly forget what you've typed as soon as you hit submit? I'm curious why you're so keen to apply certain standards to the posts of others that you don't apply to your own. Any ideas?
"No-one is exempt from speaking nonsense – the only misfortune is to do it solemnly."
Michel de Montaigne, Essais, 1580
User avatar
THWOTH
RS Donator
 
Posts: 37132
Age: 57

Country: Untied Kingdom
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

#800  Postby Pudendum » Jun 24, 2022 3:51 pm

THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

How would I know?

Perhaps you have a neurological conditions, one that causes you to instantly forget what you've typed as soon as you hit submit? I'm curious why you're so keen to apply certain standards to the posts of others that you don't apply to your own. Any ideas?

lol

so you don't know what felltoearth was talking about either?

If I knew what they misunderstood, I could try to have a go at explaining. If you knew, you could explain.

If you had a comment about the movie, I might be more interested. As it is though, it sounds like you are trying to make some point. Be clearer, if you want to. Unless your neurological condition prevents you.
Maybe I'll stop back in when there is more than one political opinion represented respectfully here.
User avatar
Pudendum
Banned User
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 335

Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Conspiracy Theories

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests