Pudendum wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Feel free to alert the moderators to my trolling rather than pretend to be one yourself. Or you could stop the spluttering blusterous charade too, if you want.

Looking...looking...
Are you trying to make some point about the film? 'Cause you missed again...

I don't see anything on-topic, just effluent from you. Maybe a moderator could help you make a rational point about the original topic.

On January 2, 2021, during an hour-long conference call, then-U.S. President Donald Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to change the state's vote totals from the 2020 presidential election. Trump had been defeated by Joe Biden in the election, but refused to accept the outcome[1] and made a months-long effort to overturn the results. Prior to the call to Raffensperger, Trump spoke repeatedly to state and local officials in at least three states in which he had lost, urging them to recount votes, throw out some ballots, or replace the Democratic slate of electors with a Republican slate.

...

On January 11, the phone call was cited in the article of impeachment in the second impeachment of Donald Trump introduced in the House of Representatives.[9] Raffensperger's office opened a fact-finding and administrative investigation of potential election interference regarding Trump's efforts to overturn the results in Georgia, and Fulton County prosecutors opened a criminal investigation in February.[10][11]

felltoearth wrote:AP watched the movie so you don’t have to

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2022/05/09/ga ... lot-mules/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Animavore wrote:I'll watch it when it gets a general release in the cinema.

A film that debuted in over 270 theaters across the United States

Spearthrower wrote:Fortunately, the actual conspiracy failed - mostly because it was reliant on absolutely barking mad nonsense.

Actual Election Fraud wrote:So look, all I want to do is this - I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state and flipping the state is a great testament to our country.

Pudendum wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Fortunately, the actual conspiracy failed - mostly because it was reliant on absolutely barking mad nonsense.

Actual Election Fraud wrote:So look, all I want to do is this - I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state and flipping the state is a great testament to our country.

If you keep commenting on things outside the thread, Spearthrower might call a mod on you for trolling.

Pudendum wrote:I'll just laugh at you, and enjoy your comedy.

Actual Election Fraud wrote:So look, all I want to do is this - I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state and flipping the state is a great testament to our country.

Safe Space wrote:Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Spearthrower wrote:

Pudendum wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:Fortunately, the actual conspiracy failed - mostly because it was reliant on absolutely barking mad nonsense.

Actual Election Fraud wrote:So look, all I want to do is this - I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state and flipping the state is a great testament to our country.

If you keep commenting on things outside the thread, Spearthrower might call a mod on you for trolling.

Feel free to stop pretending you're a moderator and not some dude who rocked up to troll the membership here.

Pudendum wrote:I'll just laugh at you, and enjoy your comedy.

Nice to know I can bring smiles - warms the cockles.

But aren't you supposed to be like SUPER interested in the film you can't be bothered to watch? You know, like how we're supposed to be seriously analyzing the 'evidence' in the film you can't be bothered to watch yourself?

Funny how when you can't be bothered to watch it, it's just a few words explaining away why, but when other people can't be bothered to watch it it's because of proud ignorance, safe spaces, and *checks notes*... political tribalism... try hard, chap, eh? Try hard!

Pudendum wrote:[

A film that debuted in over 270 theaters across the United States

I guess he'll have seen it by now then.

Pudendum wrote:I'm more interested in the media response (and yours)

I've skimmed enough of it to get the gist of what they were presenting. Is there some part of the film you wanted to discuss? Or is it better to stay within your safe zone?

And how the heck could it be that a site calling itself 'rational' has a totally unified political position against any evidence of election fraud, in one particular election? It's almost as if somehow there is a thumb on the scale...

Spearthrower wrote:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2% ... phone_call

On January 2, 2021, during an hour-long conference call, then-U.S. President Donald Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to change the state's vote totals from the 2020 presidential election. Trump had been defeated by Joe Biden in the election, but refused to accept the outcome[1] and made a months-long effort to overturn the results. Prior to the call to Raffensperger, Trump spoke repeatedly to state and local officials in at least three states in which he had lost, urging them to recount votes, throw out some ballots, or replace the Democratic slate of electors with a Republican slate.

...

On January 11, the phone call was cited in the article of impeachment in the second impeachment of Donald Trump introduced in the House of Representatives.[9] Raffensperger's office opened a fact-finding and administrative investigation of potential election interference regarding Trump's efforts to overturn the results in Georgia, and Fulton County prosecutors opened a criminal investigation in February.[10][11]

Pudendum wrote:And how the heck could it be that a site calling itself 'rational' has a totally unified political position against any evidence of election fraud, in one particular election? It's almost as if somehow there is a thumb on the scale...

Morton's Safe Space wrote:Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Spearthrower wrote:


You realize you're completely transparent?

Now pretend to be serious again about discussing a film you can't even be bothered to watch.

That's a classic.

newolder wrote:How would finding one more vote than "we have" help?

Pudendum wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:


You realize you're completely transparent?

Now pretend to be serious again about discussing a film you can't even be bothered to watch.

That's a classic.

I've watched enough of it to recognize that all your responses here are more 'trollish' than they are 'rationalist'.

Good job representing yourself. Just wash your hand after.