proudfootz wrote:Animavore wrote:I don't have loads of posts trying to discuss the finer details of a fantasy role-playing game hobby. Almost none.
Arguing over 9/11 or JFK is like arguing if The Hulk can beat Superman. Most people don't take such what if scenarios seriously. But some people get to into it and get heated over such silly arguments. They have to be 'right' in a topic of the imagination of which the rules can be twisted to suit the argument.
That's conspiracy theorists in a nutshell. Arguing that over a crappy, badly written Dan Brown novel like it's a history book.
I'm told this thread (and other incarnations) have going on for
years.So you're saying all the fine folks who've been contributing to this thread are no better than comic book fans?
You have contempt for Weaver and other would-be 'debunkers'? Because they have a
need to be 'right'?
Like
you do?
Really funny to see you throwing all your friends under the bus just to
pretend you had a point!
Wow! You really think the ones laying facts are part of the let's pretend game conspiracy theorists are? Do you believe I was referring to them when I was talking about conspiracy theorists arguing with each other?
Those guys are grown adults. They're the ones saying, guys, it's not real.
I was referring to when conspiracy theorists argue contradictory points with one another by making up shit. Like when I argued stuff about Trump I couldn't possibly know and you tried retort with something you couldn't possibly know. Assertion vs assertion. Only I knew I was talking shit, having a laugh. You thought you were making an argument.
A most evolved electron.