Fallible wrote:Many what? Pole dancers? Quantity surveyors? Russian gymnasts?

None of the above. Click the links

For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

Answering the question himself would require educating himself into the science - which would result in him not answering, because he would know that the claims made by anti-vaxers are complete and utter bullshit.

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

But that's not what she said. She wanted you to explain the information in the link that you think is relevant and an answer to the question, without following the link herself.

Weaver wrote:Answering the question himself would require educating himself into the science.

As if it was such an important question
And btw, do you have the habit of answering important questions

Weaver wrote:But that's not what she said.

She asked Who. There are several of them. And so I posted the link

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

These dodges of yours are quite informative, I must say.

the_5th_ape wrote:

Weaver wrote:Answering the question himself would require educating himself into the science.

As if it was such an important question
And btw, do you have the habit of answering important questions

Yes, I do. Ask one.

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

These dodges of yours are quite informative, I must say.

If I was promoting the "keep kids suffering and dying from preventable diseases" camp I'd probably avoid questions as well.

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

These dodges of yours are quite informative, I must say.

You wont be taxed for clicking that goddamn fckng link.

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Yes, but nowdays vaccines carry more risks than benefits

Says who?

Please read this
On FB

Answer the question.

I said Many. I will just name a few..

American Physicians Association,
the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS),
Journal of the American Medical Association
CDC
International Medical Veritas Association,
Orthomolecular Physicians

Please give direct citations to where each of those organizations says that vaccines carry more risk than benefit.

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment.

Well then, sit closer to the screen.

Oh, and by the way, the "International Medical Veritas Association" appears to be a one-person "group" - and he's a nutjob, advocating all sorts of pseudoscientific nonsense.

Orthomolecular Physicans practice made-up nonsense hypothesized by Linus Pauling, such as claims that mega-dose Vitamin C could "cure" most ills - without evidentiary support.

Inclusion of those two groups with the prior 4 real scientific groups speaks wonders for your dishonesty or ignorance.

Weaver wrote:Please give direct citations to where each of those organizations says that vaccines carry more risk than benefit.

Sorry, I am not gonna do the digging work for you.

Well, that sums it up.

wtf, i got my posts interchanged

the_5th_ape wrote:
I said Many. I will just name a few..

Ok, let's take one of these at random...

CDC

Alrighty...

From the CDC's own website; a page puzzlingly entitled 'Why CDC is Commited to Global Immunization'

Immunization is a global health priority for CDC. Vaccines save lives, prevent disease, and are cost-effective and much cheaper than hospitalizations. It has demonstrated large-scale impact on health, with effective strategies and clear targets that lead to dramatic improvements in health. Working closely with public health partners, continued significant progress can be made to reduce health disparities and ensure everyone has access to life-saving vaccines.

http://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/immunization/why/

the_5th_ape wrote:

Weaver wrote:Please give direct citations to where each of those organizations says that vaccines carry more risk than benefit.

Sorry, I am not gonna do the digging work for you.

Crap - you are making the claim, it is up to you to back up your assertions.

Dishonest debate - as usual.

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

These dodges of yours are quite informative, I must say.

You wont be taxed for clicking that goddamn fckng link.

Maybe not, but I do wonder why you and some others are so keen on posting links and videos without any summaries.
It's almost as if there's some benefit to someone from having traffic driven to them.

Anyway, experience has shown me that most of the links and videos you post are a waste of time, so it would be a tax on my time, so I no longer bother following your bullshit links.

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

Many crackpot geologists.