Creationist Split From "Let's Talk About Evolution"

MrDunsapy · #1 by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 12:56 am

!	GENERAL MODNOTE Split off from this thread. SDL

The reality is that there is no evidence for 'evolution at all.
It is only an idea that the scientists have made up.
Here are 3 facts that we have evidence for.
1 life come from life
2 a human comes from humans
3 there is design in life.
No one has any other evidence other than this.
Now the interesting thing about this is, that the 'evolutionary' scientists are against all 3 facts. Where as all 3 support creation.

Durro · #2 by **Durro** » Dec 19, 2011 2:58 am

MrDunsapy · #3 by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 3:21 am

Durro wrote::popcorn:

Ha Ha I like that. Did your popcorn just evolve out of the bag, or you get it some place? 8-)

LucidFlight · #4 by **LucidFlight** » Dec 19, 2011 3:29 am

Could it be? Really?

(Very possibly Poe. Hard to say at this stage.)

ETA: Either way, welcome to the forum, MrDunsapy! :cheers:

MrDunsapy · #5 by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 4:04 am

Thanks.
With so many posts you guys must know everything by now!

Landrew · #6 by **Landrew** » Dec 19, 2011 4:14 am

Creationism is dead in the water without magic. It purports that a magical creator magically created everything by magic.

We know that magic is not real; science has disproved it millions of times.

Magic does not exist, therefore we must rely on what we can measure and see. Evolution is based on that.

MrDunsapy · #7 by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 4:49 am

Landrew wrote:Creationism is dead in the water without magic. It purports that a magical creator magically created everything by magic.

We know that magic is not real; science has disproved it millions of times.

Magic does not exist, therefore we must rely on what we can measure and see. Evolution is based on that.

Actually if the scientists create life in a lab will that be magic? Or just the use of science.
And if they do create life, like that , does that not show that God could have done it that way also? After all they sure have not shown that it could just happen on its own.
For life to just pop up out of the ground , would not that be magic.
So who is really supporting magic?

Landrew · #8 by **Landrew** » Dec 19, 2011 4:52 am

MrDunsapy wrote:
Landrew wrote:Creationism is dead in the water without magic. It purports that a magical creator magically created everything by magic.

We know that magic is not real; science has disproved it millions of times.

Magic does not exist, therefore we must rely on what we can measure and see. Evolution is based on that.

Actually if the scientists create life in a lab will that be magic? Or just the use of science.
And if they do create life, like that , does that not show that God could have done it that way also? After all they sure have not shown that it could just happen on its own.
For life to just pop up out of the ground , would not that be magic.
So who is really supporting magic?

There is no real magic,
as any good magician will tell you.

MrDunsapy · #9 by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 4:55 am

There is no real magic,
as any good magician will tell you.

That's correct, it is all ID.

sennekuyl · **#10** by **sennekuyl** » Dec 19, 2011 4:58 am

Mr Dunsapy? We need help here: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/creat ... -1920.html

MrDunsapy · **#11** by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 5:02 am

sennekuyl wrote:Mr Dunsapy? We need help here: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/creat ... -1920.html

Whats your problem?

sennekuyl · **#12** by **sennekuyl** » Dec 19, 2011 5:06 am

There aren't enough proponents of ID who are familiar with the process to debunk the evolutionary presuppositions.

Ihavenofingerprints · **#13** by **Ihavenofingerprints** » Dec 19, 2011 5:11 am

MrDunsapy, what brings you to this thread? How did you find ratskep?

MrDunsapy · **#14** by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 5:12 am

sennekuyl wrote:There aren't enough proponents of ID who are familiar with the process to debunk the evolutionary presuppositions.

I took a look at that , and the comments were all over the place. I also noticed the first post was not there. So what was the question or statement about?

sennekuyl · **#15** by **sennekuyl** » Dec 19, 2011 5:16 am

Sorry, thought the thread was too long to set you to the beginning. I'm having trouble figuring out where to jump in too. Rodcarty seems to be on his own.

Sorry for taking this thread off topic. I'll stop now.

MrDunsapy · **#16** by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 5:24 am

Ihavenofingerprints wrote:MrDunsapy, what brings you to this thread? How did you find ratskep?

Actually, it was the invitation to Talk about 'Evolution' .

Spearthrower · **#17** by **Spearthrower** » Dec 19, 2011 5:27 am

MrDunsapy wrote:The reality is that there is no evidence for 'evolution at all.

That's an obscenely mendacious way to start your tenure here.

Suggestion: go to a natural history museum.

Darwinsbulldog · **#18** by **Darwinsbulldog** » Dec 19, 2011 5:37 am

MrDunsapy wrote:

There is no real magic,
as any good magician will tell you.

That's correct, it is all ID.

Wow! Glad you cleared all that up for us. Thanks!

MrDunsapy · **#19** by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 5:51 am

Darwinsbulldog wrote:
MrDunsapy wrote:

There is no real magic,
as any good magician will tell you.

That's correct, it is all ID.

Wow! Glad you cleared all that up for us. Thanks!

I wasn't sure if you knew that or not?

MrDunsapy · **#20** by **MrDunsapy** » Dec 19, 2011 5:53 am

Spearthrower wrote:
MrDunsapy wrote:The reality is that there is no evidence for 'evolution at all.

That's an obscenely mendacious way to start your tenure here.

Suggestion: go to a natural history museum.

I enjoy going to museums like that. The science is amazing, its just the interpretations you have to watch out for.