[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw6twe73k3Y[/youtube]

Good grief. It is amazing that creationists always seem to gloss over the fact that there are always limiting factors to population.

Crocodile Gandhi wrote:Good grief. It is amazing that creationists always seem to gloss over the fact that there are always limiting factors to population.

..one of them being death.

By his calculations, we are swimming in an ocean of cockroaches.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5eFM6C3lfc[/youtube]

great rebuttal to not only this claim but also a few others.

The first 150 years is problematical.

Either a 150 year old couple had twins or there were several generations of incestuous inbreds. ( Which could explain why they thought theism is a good idea. )

By his own claims on the rate of doubling etc, even if the YECs were right and the world was only 6000 years old we would still expect to have close to 11 trillion people on the planet right now.

Jef wrote:By his own claims on the rate of doubling etc, even if the YECs were right and the world was only 6000 years old we would still expect to have close to 11 trillion people on the planet right now.

I think you are forgetting about Noah's flood, silly.

Crocodile Gandhi wrote:

Jef wrote:By his own claims on the rate of doubling etc, even if the YECs were right and the world was only 6000 years old we would still expect to have close to 11 trillion people on the planet right now.

I think you are forgetting about Noah's flood, silly.

Let's set duh flud at about 4285 years ago (AIG). Now according to the wholly babble, just after the flood we have noah, his sons, and the sons of his sons etc. all listed (Genesis 10). In total, there a 30 named males. For the sake of argument we will have to assume one female for each male.

So starting from 60 and doubling in size each 150 years (28 doublings), I get 16,106,127,360 people. Hmmm.

Creationists and mathematics rarely combine well. It's like letting a two-year old child play with a power tool. At best the results will be messy. More often than not they inflict terrible damage upon themselves.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw6twe73k3Y[/youtube]



It's amusing that he thinks that he can apply mathematics.

You get to a point where you don't even bother watching these things

Let me guess ... this is yet another YouTube creo-wanker who doesn't understand such basic concepts as predation, disease or carrying capacity?

I remember demonstrating the absurdity of unconstrained population growth using Mola mola, which is ideal for the purpose.

Worse, it's the same Youtube creo-wanker, (un)truthful cretin

Without even watching it I can tell from the caps and retarded title its by lady-hands Matthew the Troothful christian.

Millefleur wrote:Without even watching it I can tell from the caps and retarded title its by lady-hands Matthew the Troothful Chrischun.

Fixed.

"Evolution denied in less fewer than 10 braincells".

Ugh. I watched that to waste time while waiting for something to download. The progress bar would have been more interesting and informative
Mission accomplished though.

I thought we already had a thread about this video? Perhaps it was at the other place. Basically this moron needs to brush up on his stats skills and his magical immortal population of humans.

Fuckwit.