NilsGLindgren wrote:

NilsGLindgren wrote:I have this phrase churning around in me head since I read the title of this thread, "Evolution rejects US Protestants pastors" and even tried to google it but to no avail ... somebody, please help ...

Well ... ANYBODY ... please help!

... What exactly are you asking for?

falconjudge wrote:

NilsGLindgren wrote:

NilsGLindgren wrote:I have this phrase churning around in me head since I read the title of this thread, "Evolution rejects US Protestants pastors" and even tried to google it but to no avail ... somebody, please help ...

Well ... ANYBODY ... please help!

... What exactly are you asking for?

BAsically, if the phrase "Evolution rejects US Protestants Pastors" could parse into anything meaningful. Most likely not.

Ah. Then, aside from the usual demeaning comments, I doubt it.

I believe you are right. I'll have to settle for a cup of coffee.

Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

What willhud9 said.

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

Spearthrower wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

Now, now Spearie, we have to wait patiently for Joe's magnum opus that will blow Raven Darwin's evil nonsense out of the water!
Help us Obi Joe, you're our only hope!

Spearthrower wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Atheistoclast wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Another hypothesis could be that their stomachs hurt from all the laughing. Hard to debate you Joe, when rolling all over the floor laughing, and taking a breath is almost impossible.

Darwinsbulldog wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Another hypothesis could be that their stomachs hurt from all the laughing. Hard to debate you Joe, when rolling all over the floor laughing, and taking a breath is almost impossible.

Sure there is no one "down under" willing to debate the Clast?

Atheistoclast wrote:

Darwinsbulldog wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Another hypothesis could be that their stomachs hurt from all the laughing. Hard to debate you Joe, when rolling all over the floor laughing, and taking a breath is almost impossible.

Sure there is no one "down under" willing to debate the Clast?

Unfortunately it seems no one is available to help you grapple with your sense of personal incredulity. Please go ahead and continue cursing the establishment for not letting you pit your ignorance against their evidence:

Atheistoclast wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:Great stuff. The more people reject Darwinism the sooner it will end up on the ash heap of history. We do need to get rid of the teaching of evolutionism and other pseudo-scientific theories in the classroom.

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Or disinterested in talking to someone without the basic level of expertise.

Might be good on your C.V. - of zero value on theirs... and you know, they're kind of busy educating people about modern knowledge.

Atheistoclast wrote:

Darwinsbulldog wrote:

Atheistoclast wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Scientific findings aren't subject to people's temperaments, Joe. Seems like your arguments are regressing to your earlier demagoguery. Is it the rejection from journals that's inciting this?

I need a one-on-one public debate with a Darwinist at a university. But they are way too scared.

Another hypothesis could be that their stomachs hurt from all the laughing. Hard to debate you Joe, when rolling all over the floor laughing, and taking a breath is almost impossible.

Sure there is no one "down under" willing to debate the Clast?

Ken Ham's an aussie - he's about the right level of technical expertise.