Wortfish wrote:Calilasseia wrote:Who fucking cares about this? The Declaration of Independence isn't a scientific document, and was furthermore written in an era when supernaturalism still exerted undue control over discourse - an era before science had rendered mythological assertions irrelevant with respect to vast classes of entities and phenomena. If citing this document is the best you can do, it's a measure of your apologetic desperation.
PLOS genetics should care since it is a journal published in the United States and the DOI is a foundational document of the US for all its citizens.
You do not know your subject.
The declaration was written for an audience of one person. It succeeded. Now, it’s a historical novelty. We draw no laws or give no authority based on that document.
Wortfish wrote: And, as I pointed out, Darwin himself referred to the "Creator" who breathed life into the first organism. Thomas Jefferson and Charles Darwin would be forced to retract their works by a scientific community that refuses to even countenance the very possibility that the human hand was designed intentionally. Oh, and Alfred Russel Wallace made the same claim in his own tract on the subject:
http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S165.htmThe hand of man contains latent capacities and powers which are unused by savages, and must have been even less used by palæolithic man and his still ruder predecessors. It has all the appearance of an organ prepared for the use of civilized man, and one which was required to render civilization possible.
Blah, blah, blah. Why should Darwin were he alive, be forced to retract all of his work over his use of the word “creator”? What does that lack of insight have to do with any other thing he wrote?
This isn’t how the scientific process, or reality for that matter, works. If that were so, all we need do is realize that you made stupid mistakes before now. I know for an absolute fact there is a time when you couldn’t multiply numbers with more than one digit correctly. And that should be sufficient to ignore any other thing you have to say.
But, but, but...
Sent from my completely solar powered iPad using Tapatalk