Why stevebee is wrong

Incl. intelligent design, belief in divine creation

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5701  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 15, 2013 6:54 pm

theropod said:
Tell us.

Remember my discussion on groupthink? I can't imagine in any other venue where people communicate in plural pronouns. It's unique to evolution. "WE" think. Tell "US" "WE" understand that....
It's a clue about what evolution does to people. It removes their ability to think independently and objectively; to be skeptical and question. If you were truly all skeptics, you would not only question religion, but you would question evolution as well. But you don't and cannot as long as you think in groups.
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5702  Postby ElDiablo » Aug 15, 2013 7:08 pm

:thumbup: More evasion.
God is silly putty.
User avatar
ElDiablo
 
Posts: 3128

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5703  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 15, 2013 7:19 pm

theropod said:
The trouble is I don't think Steve even visits other threads here, and only ever watches over this topic like a circling hawk.
That isn't a problem. I feel the issue arises when the content is purposefully formed to stir up shit. There is no rational discourse even attempted by Steve. That bothers me.


Try reading the answers to the challenges I posed in past entries. They involve me asking concrete question, and the brothers here attacking my name, education, persona. Rational discourse isn't possible here. I do check in on other threads. Here are a couple of my favorite comments:

"Oh, it's Ray Lyingtwat Comfort? Well, here's a man who's entire livelihood has been built on deliberately lying, quotemining and misrepesenting."-rumraket
Oh it's Ray Comfort. Why would any serious biologist bother with someone as far up his own arse as this dickhead? Calilasseia


Why would anyone bother writing such stuff, theropod? The "skeptics" demean their own credibility. Why not discuss intelligently and thoughtfully. I haven't been here for six months, but I had a feeling my book cover would wind up here, and of course I had to take a peek; to see what the "skeptics" would have to say. I wasn't disappointed. The reaction falls right in line with these "comments".
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5704  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 15, 2013 7:28 pm

Shrunk said:
Creationists, OTOH, aren't real scientists, but immoral lying sacks of shit.


I thought you were a psychiatrist. This isn't the kind of dialogue I would expect from a highly educated physician such as yourself. It's also a reason I wouldn't waste my time answering your question. I hope you turn down all "lying sacks of shit" who come to you for treatment.
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5705  Postby theropod » Aug 15, 2013 7:33 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:
theropod said:
Tell us.

Remember my discussion on groupthink? I can't imagine in any other venue where people communicate in plural pronouns. It's unique to evolution. "WE" think. Tell "US" "WE" understand that....
It's a clue about what evolution does to people. It removes their ability to think independently and objectively; to be skeptical and question. If you were truly all skeptics, you would not only question religion, but you would question evolution as well. But you don't and cannot as long as you think in groups.


Your lack of ability to imagine things has been documented well before now. How, exactly, is that my problem?

We Americans don't like terrorists, and we Arkansas love the Razorbacks, and we liberals don't like anti-abortion laws that limit a woman's rights, and we dentists don't like tooth decay, and we skeptics don't like trollish bullshit.

See how utter wrong your lack of imagination can make your assertions?

It seems you only intent for posting here is to rile up folks.

I have questioned evolution more times than you have typed the word. That, sir, is the fucking point of research in the biological sciences. Too bad all your alleged formal education didn't expose you to this glaring fact.

Go on, Steve, keep presenting the image of an absolute Goober. It's posts like yours that make US ALL giggle from time to time. It's a morbid laugh though, and many of US regret laughing at such sadness.

RS
Last edited by theropod on Aug 15, 2013 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 7529
Age: 70
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5706  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 15, 2013 7:45 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:
Thomas Eshuis
I'd much rather read a book about Einstein's theories by people who've actually studied him and who have a background in physics...


Hey, that's me! I've studied Einstein, and I have a background in physics. Only fifteen bucks for the book, Thomas.

Seeing how you cannot even be honest about your name, I won't take your academic credentials at face value either.
Especially not considering your utter lack of understanding of even the basics of science, let alone any specific field.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5707  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 15, 2013 7:47 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:
theropod said:
Tell us.

Remember my discussion on groupthink? I can't imagine in any other venue where people communicate in plural pronouns. It's unique to evolution. "WE" think. Tell "US" "WE" understand that....

Remember when we explained the elementary fact to you that people agreeing on something or counting themselves as part of a group is not automatically a bad thing?
I mean 5 year olds are able to graps that, why can't you?

stevebee92653 wrote:It's a clue about what evolution does to people. It removes their ability to think independently and objectively; to be skeptical and question. If you were truly all skeptics, you would not only question religion, but you would question evolution as well. But you don't and cannot as long as you think in groups.

Same disgusting rectal matter again.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5708  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 15, 2013 7:50 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:
theropod said:
The trouble is I don't think Steve even visits other threads here, and only ever watches over this topic like a circling hawk.
That isn't a problem. I feel the issue arises when the content is purposefully formed to stir up shit. There is no rational discourse even attempted by Steve. That bothers me.


Try reading the answers to the challenges bollocks I posed in past entries. They involve me asking concrete asinine questions, and the brothers members here attacking criticising the dishonesty of me using multpiple false names, education, persona. Rational discourse with me isn't possible here. I do check in on other threads. Here are a couple of my favorite comments:

FIFY.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5709  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 15, 2013 7:54 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:"Oh, it's Ray Lyingtwat Comfort? Well, here's a man who's entire livelihood has been built on deliberately lying, quotemining and misrepesenting."-rumraket
Oh it's Ray Comfort. Why would any serious biologist bother with someone as far up his own arse as this dickhead? Calilasseia

They are perfectly accurate, if somewhat explicit depictions of Ray Comfort.

stevebee92653 wrote:Why would anyone bother writing such stuff, theropod?

To point out how dishonest Ray Comfort is.

stevebee92653 wrote:The "skeptics" demean their own credibility.

Keep mindlessly asserting that ad-nauseam and I'm sure it'll magically become true. :nono:

stevebee92653 wrote:Why not discuss intelligently and thoughtfully.

Why not check all posts made by the posters you quoted? Because you clearly haven't otherwise you'd know they offer quite intelligent and thoughtful posts.

stevebee92653 wrote:I haven't been here for six months, but I had a feeling my book cover would wind up here, and of course I had to take a peek; to see what the "skeptics" would have to say. I wasn't disappointed. The reaction falls right in line with these "comments".

Ah how wonderful it must be to simply dodge and twist, all the while spouting ludicrous ad-hominems about your opponents. :yuk:
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5710  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 15, 2013 7:56 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:
Shrunk said:
Creationists, OTOH, aren't real scientists, but immoral lying sacks of shit.


I thought you were a psychiatrist. This isn't the kind of dialogue I would expect from a highly educated physician such as yourself.

What you do or do not expect of highly educated physicians means diddly squat. They're under no obligation to answer to your personal expectations.

stevebee92653 wrote:It's also a reason I wouldn't waste my time answering your question. I hope you turn down all "lying sacks of shit" who come to you for treatment.

Translation, I cannot honestly answer your question so I'll attempt to dodge it by crying persecution. :nono:
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5711  Postby ADParker » Aug 15, 2013 10:38 pm

stevebee92653 wrote:[color=#0040FF]Do you ever say anything nice ADParker?

Yes I do, quite often. but when I get nothing but the kind of responses you dish out it quickly becomes clear that there is no value in continuing to do so.

stevebee92653 wrote:Do any of your cohorts here? Ever?

If by "cohorts" you mean the other members of this forum, then Yes.

stevebee92653 wrote:You sure did a sudden vanish at evillusion.net. What happened?

I think it was sufficiently clear that you weren't interested in answering any of my questions or addressing any of my points.
Reason Over Faith
User avatar
ADParker
RS Donator
 
Name: Andrew
Posts: 5643
Age: 52
Male

Country: New Zealand
New Zealand (nz)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5712  Postby theropod » Aug 15, 2013 10:41 pm

What, Steve being evasive and annoying? I'm shocked. Shocked!!

RS
Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 7529
Age: 70
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5713  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 16, 2013 3:07 am

theropod said:
We Americans don't like terrorists, and we Arkansas love the Razorbacks, and we liberals don't like anti-abortion laws that limit a woman's rights, and we dentists don't like tooth decay, and we skeptics don't like trollish bullshit. Go on, Steve, keep presenting the image of an absolute Goober. It's posts like yours that make US ALL giggle from time to time. It's a morbid laugh though, and many of US regret laughing at such sadness.


Theropod, you're trying too hard and not being logical. Ever heard this conversation?

What football team are you for?
Oh, we're for the Arkansas Razorbacks! [i]We
Americans sure are! [/i]

Are you for or against abortion?
Oh, we liberals are for abortion!
Tro lo lo lo lo.


You're a groupthinker and don't knowit. I sure wouldn't be giggling too much about it if I were you. I would be concerned. You can't be. You're a full evolutionaut, over the cliff, and you can't return.

Me? I'm a USC Trojan fan, and I'm pro- choice. I couldn't even think of putting a WEE WEE in the formula. And I sincerely wish I could make you see the point I am making, but I realize that's impossible. You can't even consider it.
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5714  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 16, 2013 3:40 am

Thomas Eshuis said:
Diddley squat?

:lol: I hope you're not in med school.

Thomas Eshuis said:
Translation, I cannot honestly answer your question so I'll attempt to dodge it by crying persecution.


I can't answer what IID is? :lol: Well, since I coined the term, I would say you're wrong. Sorry. It's just that I wouldn't waste the answer on someone who thinks every creationist who disagrees with him is a lying sack of shit. In my world, I wouldn't expect that kind of dialogue from a physician. Of course in yours, it doesn't mean diddley squat. I like my world better.
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5715  Postby Rumraket » Aug 16, 2013 5:11 am

Steve, I'm going to make this as short as possible: Your fantasy has failed, you're not going to make money on the evolution vs creationism debate, at least from anyone on this forum.

Time to go "invent" another money-making scheme. Bye! :cheers:
Half-Life 3 - I want to believe
User avatar
Rumraket
 
Posts: 13264
Age: 43

Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5716  Postby stevebee92653 » Aug 16, 2013 7:04 am

Rumraket wrote:Steve, I'm going to make this as short as possible: Your fantasy has failed, you're not going to make money on the evolution vs creationism debate, at least from anyone on this forum.

Time to go "invent" another money-making scheme. Bye! :cheers:


I came back to say adios myself. Cheers. :cheers: BTW, my object isn't to make money. On this venue, or any other. I really don't care how many books I sell, or if I make money. Just like my "discussions" here, I do what I do for pure fun. Also, I don't debate evolution vs. creation. That's your fantasy. Adios
User avatar
stevebee92653
Banned Troll
 
Name: Steve
Posts: 1324

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5717  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Aug 16, 2013 7:08 am

stevebee92653 wrote:
Thomas Eshuis said:
Diddley squat?

:lol: I hope you're not in med school.

I really don't see what that has got to do with the price of fish.
But then I guess this is yet another peurile attempt by you dismiss criticism out of hand.

stevebee92653 wrote:
Thomas Eshuis said:
Translation, I cannot honestly answer your question so I'll attempt to dodge it by crying persecution.


I can't answer what IID is? :lol: Well, since I coined the term, I would say you're wrong.

Then it shouldn't be hard for you to answer now would it?

stevebee92653 wrote:Sorry. It's just that I wouldn't waste the answer on someone who thinks every creationist who disagrees with him is a lying sack of shit.

Where have I said this? Oh that's right: nowhere. So that's yet another dishonest straw-man.


stevebee92653 wrote:In my world, I wouldn't expect that kind of dialogue from a physician. Of course in yours, it doesn't mean diddley squat. I like my world better.

Fortunately we do not live in your world, or mine for that matter, we live in the world. Without it obeying to anyones personal expectations.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5718  Postby Rumraket » Aug 16, 2013 7:09 am

stevebee92653 wrote:
Rumraket wrote:Steve, I'm going to make this as short as possible: Your fantasy has failed, you're not going to make money on the evolution vs creationism debate, at least from anyone on this forum.

Time to go "invent" another money-making scheme. Bye! :cheers:


I came back to say adios myself. Cheers. :cheers: BTW, my object isn't to make money. On this venue, or any other. I really don't care how many books I sell, or if I make money.

Riiiiiiiiiiight. :roll:
Half-Life 3 - I want to believe
User avatar
Rumraket
 
Posts: 13264
Age: 43

Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5719  Postby Paul » Aug 16, 2013 7:18 am

stevebee92653 wrote:Just like my "discussions" here, I do what I do for pure fun.


Looks like a clear admission to me.
"Peter, I can see your house from here!"
User avatar
Paul
 
Posts: 4550
Age: 65
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Why stevebee is wrong

#5720  Postby Scot Dutchy » Aug 16, 2013 7:19 am

stevebee92653 wrote:
Rumraket wrote:Steve, I'm going to make this as short as possible: Your fantasy has failed, you're not going to make money on the evolution vs creationism debate, at least from anyone on this forum.

Time to go "invent" another money-making scheme. Bye! :cheers:


I came back to say adios myself. Cheers. :cheers: BTW, my object isn't to make money. On this venue, or any other. I really don't care how many books I sell, or if I make money. Just like my "discussions" here, I do what I do for pure fun. Also, I don't debate evolution vs. creation. That's your fantasy. Adios


What else are you here for?

Logical reasoning? :rofl:

The truth? :rofl:

Discussions? :rofl:

Steve you should start a one man show. If you just realised how funny what you write is.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 43119
Age: 75
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
 
Birthday
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to Creationism

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests