Paul wrote:

stevebee92653 wrote:Just like my "discussions" here, I do what I do for pure fun.

Looks like a clear admission to me.

stevebee92653 wrote:

theropod said:
Tell us.

Remember my discussion on groupthink? I can't imagine in any other venue where people communicate in plural pronouns. It's unique to evolution. "WE" think. Tell "US" "WE" understand that....
It's a clue about what evolution does to people. It removes their ability to think independently and objectively; to be skeptical and question. If you were truly all skeptics, you would not only question religion, but you would question evolution as well. But you don't and cannot as long as you think in groups.

stevebee92653 wrote:

Rumraket wrote:Steve, I'm going to make this as short as possible: Your fantasy has failed, you're not going to make money on the evolution vs creationism debate, at least from anyone on this forum.

Time to go "invent" another money-making scheme. Bye!

I came back to say adios myself. Cheers. BTW, my object isn't to make money. On this venue, or any other. I really don't care how many books I sell, or if I make money. Just like my "discussions" here, I do what I do for pure fun. Also, I don't debate evolution vs. creation. That's your fantasy. Adios

stevebee92653 wrote:

Thomas Eshuis said:
Diddley squat?

I hope you're not in med school.

Thomas Eshuis said:
Translation, I cannot honestly answer your question so I'll attempt to dodge it by crying persecution.

I can't answer what IID is? Well, since I coined the term, I would say you're wrong. Sorry. It's just that I wouldn't waste the answer on someone who thinks every creationist who disagrees with him is a lying sack of shit. In my world, I wouldn't expect that kind of dialogue from a physician. Of course in yours, it doesn't mean diddley squat. I like my world better.

Code: Select all

[quote][b]Thomas Eshuis[/b] said:

stevebee92653 wrote:Oldskeptic, you obviously have no absolute idea what Einstein's theory on the relationship between time and speed between an observer and the observed is, now do you. It would be a fascinating thing for you to learn, and by jove, the story is in my book! You're in luck! You will also learn many things you obviously don't know about, like protein synthesis, the formation of the universe, what might or might not have happened with the advent of the first proto cells. It would be a wonderful buy for you. I highly recommend it. Only 15 bucks!

lucek said:
So $15 for a vanity press book that essentially is going to be a rehash of every creationist argument but written by someone I can barely stand to read on this forum. I'll pass. Just doing some research, By chance is this book of yours paperback 84 pages and from Lulu?

lucek said;
But whatever moving on again as you have chosen to pass on my last request maybe you'd like to discus what the first protocells possibly looked like and about their possible predecessors?

stevebee92653 wrote:

lucek said:
So $15 for a vanity press book that essentially is going to be a rehash of every creationist argument but written by someone I can barely stand to read on this forum. I'll pass. Just doing some research, By chance is this book of yours paperback 84 pages and from Lulu?

No.

lucek said;
But whatever moving on again as you have chosen to pass on my last request maybe you'd like to discus what the first protocells possibly looked like and about their possible predecessors?

If you have something even remotely interesting to say, I'll check back and respond. Otherwise, the adios sticks. The continual insignificant ragging is such a bore. I actually wrote a book. It's interesting to see how many ratskepers here, you included, who have never written anything except these in you arse comments here, continually rag on something they have never read and have no idea about it's contents, don't you think? I do have three chapters in my book on the beginning of life, protocells, and the beginning of multis. So wachout. I'm pretty much up on your subject choice. If you can barely stand to read my responses, why would you want to continue to torture yourself? Of all of your thread choices, why are you here? Fascinating and puzzling.

stevebee92653 wrote:If you have something even remotely interesting to say, I'll check back and respond. Otherwise, the adios sticks. The continual insignificant ragging is such a bore. I actually wrote a book. It's interesting to see how many ratskepers here, you included, who have never written anything except these in you arse comments here, continually rag on something they have never read and have no idea about it's contents, don't you think? I do have three chapters in my book on the beginning of life, protocells, and the beginning of multis. So wachout. I'm pretty much up on your subject choice. If you can barely stand to read my responses, why would you want to continue to torture yourself? Of all of your thread choices, why are you here? Fascinating and puzzling.

ADParker wrote:Well stevebee92653's book is out:

Evo-illusion: Why IID Trumps ID and Evolution. Self published of course.

I note that it has a chapter on Population paradox, which is a hoot on his blog!

Nothing of any note in the twenty pages available on the Amazon page, just puffed up self-promotion stuff about his "journey to evolutionism and then his 'amazing' discovery of the T Rex arms.
And sorry; no indication at all on what this "IID" thing is supposed to mean on the back cover either. Why would anyone buy a book that argues for something without any clue as to what it is arguing for?

Trawling through the index however reveals this:
"ingenious invention and design (IID), 53, 68, 83-84, 109, 111, 185, 251-254, 257"

The courses he took at USC were more than enough to provide him with a master's degree in biological sciences.

ElDiablo wrote:I like this part in the About the Author section.

The courses he took at USC were more than enough to provide him with a master's degree in biological sciences.

http://www.amazon.com/Evo-illusion-Why-IID-Trumps-Evolution/dp/1483661660/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1378020978&sr=1-1

Appeal to authority? It's an interesting way to say, I don't have a degree in the biological sciences but I've read enough to be an authority on the subject.

ElDiablo wrote:I like this part in the About the Author section.

The courses he took at USC were more than enough to provide him with a master's degree in biological sciences.

Evolution should have given mankind a skin covering that would save us from the extremes of weather. But instead it gave us characteristics that have nothing to do with survivability.

ElDiablo wrote:He questions why evolution hasn't designed humans better for the environment. Another fine example of a misunderstanding of a very fundamental aspect of evolution.