Anomalocaris had acute vision

Is this more evidence for the Lightswitch theory as per “in the blink of an eye” by Andrew Parker?

The accumulation of small heritable changes within populations over time.

Moderators: Calilasseia, Mazille

Anomalocaris had acute vision

 
 

Anomalocaris had acute vision

#1  Postby halucigenia » Dec 08, 2011 3:41 pm

As seen in Science Daily: World's First Super Predator Had Remarkable Vision
Reporting on this paper in Nature Nature: Acute vision in the giant Cambrian predator Anomalocaris and the origin of compound eyes
Here we report 2–3-cm paired eyes from the early Cambrian (approximately 515 million years old) Emu Bay Shale of South Australia, assigned to the Cambrian apex predator Anomalocaris. Their preserved visual surfaces are composed of at least 16,000 hexagonally packed ommatidial lenses (in a single eye), rivalling the most acute compound eyes in modern arthropods.

Might this spark some discussion over the importance of eyes to the Cambrian explosion?
User avatar
halucigenia
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 461


Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

#2  Postby susu.exp » Dec 10, 2011 9:10 pm

Interesting paper. But as far as Parker goes: I don´t think anybody doubts that the evolution of advanced vision played a part in the CE and of course finding structural color preserved was damn cool, but it doesn´t explain everything there is to explain (it doesn´t explain the timing and the duration of the CE, though it does contribute to explaining its uniqueness).
susu
susu.exp
 
Posts: 1046


Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

#3  Postby halucigenia » Dec 10, 2011 10:22 pm

Thanks for your contribution in confirmation of the contribution of the evolution of eyes to the explanation of the Cambrian explosion susu.
These were also my thoughts on the subject.
User avatar
halucigenia
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 461


Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

#4  Postby Darwinsbulldog » Dec 11, 2011 1:27 am

Better visual processing [presumably competant eyes would imply also competent visual processing] would set up an arms race between predators and also put great pressure on prey. Prey response to predation is of course varied, but armour is expected to be preserved in fossils more than other strategies. So suddenly, it didn't pay to be soft-bodied, unless there were some other defences, like poisons, speed, camoflage etc, all of which does not preserve well.
Of course, all of this is speculation rather than explanation, but I don't think it falsfies Parker's ideas. [Nor does it confirm them]. Simply too little information is left to be anything other than agnostic about the causes of the CE, although I think that innovations in Hox just got to the stage where a burst of innovation in bauplans was possible.
DBD is a fun username. I do not imagine myself as a reincarnation of T.H. Huxley, and with respect, neither should you.
User avatar
Darwinsbulldog
 
Name: Robert Hunter
Posts: 3193
Age: 57
Male

Country: Australia
Australia (au)

Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

#5  Postby halucigenia » Dec 11, 2011 1:51 pm

Hard parts, eyes, and the evolution of novel evolvable body plans all due to innovations in Hox genes. Sounds good to me.
User avatar
halucigenia
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 461


Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

 
 

Re: Anomalocaris had acute vision

#6  Postby proudfootz » Dec 14, 2011 2:05 am

Was very impressed by this book - a very elegant 'explanation' for the radical shift in evolutionary diversity.
"Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't." - Mark Twain
User avatar
proudfootz
 
Posts: 1461

Country: USA
United States (us)


Return to Evolution & Natural Selection

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest