DavidMcC wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:DavidMcC wrote:Sendraks wrote:The thread reeks of your imaginings that people have hidden agendas.
It isn't imaginatioon, Sendraks, it's a rational conclusion,
False, it's either delusional or dishonest straw-man, as I've repeatedly made it clear why I respond the way I have.
That's your opinion,
No David ,that is a FACT. You see, unlike your delusional mind reading powers, I actually KNOW my own motivations and reasons for posting.
So no, this is not a matter of opinion.
DavidMcC wrote: and I suppose you're entitled to it. However, that does not make it correct.
Correct, the fact that I know what my motivation is and have repeatedly made it explicitely clear, does.
But that won't stop you from insisting on your own fantastical straw-men, apparently.
DavidMcC wrote: mainly from TE's flagrant disregard for the OP topic,
Still hypocritical bullshit David. You pulled your own thread off-topic with baseless accusations and insinuations aimed at interlocutors.
I think it is helpful to other readers to realise that certain posters do not konw, or care anything about the OP topic. [/quote]
A complete non-sequitur to the point you're responding to.
DavidMcC wrote:DavidMcC wrote:plus his obsession with attempts to draw an insult out of me.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Because you're obvious trolling this much to distract from the beatings you keep giving your wife.

Bizarre! Truly bizarre!
That a point goes over your head is, just like so many things, your problem, not mine.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."