Well, that was an improvement. Let's hope the next series will improve on that.
It actually had me 'glued to the 'telly'.
Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1741 
by Alan B » Dec 12, 2018 9:02 am
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
-
Alan B - Posts: 9999
- Age: 86
- Country: UK (Birmingham)
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1742 by Agi Hammerthief » Jan 02, 2019 6:59 am
how awful was the new year special?
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
-
Agi Hammerthief - Posts: 3080
- Age: 49
- Country: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1743 by Alan B » Jan 02, 2019 10:53 am
It was 'OK'. A Dalek made an appearance. Too much time was spent on unrelated 'personal chit-chat' between father & son. Fast forwarded through those bits.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
-
Alan B - Posts: 9999
- Age: 86
- Country: UK (Birmingham)
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1744 by Agi Hammerthief » Jan 02, 2019 12:40 pm
Alan B wrote:It was 'OK'. A Dalek made an appearance. Too much time was spent on unrelated 'personal chit-chat' between father & son. Fast forwarded through those bits.
thanks, I‘ll pick it up in the library then.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
-
Agi Hammerthief - Posts: 3080
- Age: 49
- Country: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1745 by Thomas Eshuis » Jan 12, 2019 10:50 pm
This appeared in my recommended list:
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
-
Thomas Eshuis - Name: Thomas Eshuis
- Posts: 31091
- Age: 33
- Country: Netherlands
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1746 by Spinozasgalt » Apr 03, 2019 12:44 pm
I started watching the rest of this show recently after stopping at the end of season 2 a few years back. Now I have some quite firm opinions and will share one of these. Clara Oswald is the best of the companions with the exception of Donna.
Thanks for your time.
Thanks for your time.
When the straight and narrow gets a little too straight, roll up the joint.
Or don't. Just follow your arrow wherever it points.
Kacey Musgraves
Or don't. Just follow your arrow wherever it points.
Kacey Musgraves
-
Spinozasgalt - RS Donator
- Name: Jennifer
- Posts: 18787
- Age: 36
- Country: Australia
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1747 by i have no avatar » Jan 01, 2020 3:21 am
Wow, The Daleks and The Doctor have the same birthday, but two years apart. Whudda thunk? 
- Attachments
-
- daleks_doctor.JPG (30.55 KiB) Viewed 1721 times
but i do have a signature
- i have no avatar
- Posts: 2117
- Country: USA
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1748 by Agi Hammerthief » Jan 01, 2020 5:31 am
Agi Hammerthief wrote:how awful was the new year special?
to answer my own question: so awful that Amazon gave it to me for free apparently.
haven’t watched it yet.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
-
Agi Hammerthief - Posts: 3080
- Age: 49
- Country: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1749 by aufbahrung » Jan 01, 2020 7:58 pm
O is a double agent and crashes the plane. That's not a spoiler in the circumstance. A random set of events with no particular meaning.
“Ne vous mêlez pas du pain”
-
aufbahrung - Name: Your Real Name
- Posts: 1579
- Country: United Kingdom
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1750 by newolder » Jan 01, 2020 8:01 pm
A Masterful Fry-up to kick off a new series. 
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
newolder - Name: Albert Ross
- Posts: 7876
- Age: 1
- Country: Feudal Estate number 9
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1751 by aufbahrung » Jan 01, 2020 8:26 pm
newolder wrote:A Masterful Fry-up to kick off a new series.
Fry did the best he could with a dogs breakfast. Think he was thankful to be shot. Noticed the baddy aliens where entirely white, was that a woke thing or something ?? even there hats where white so maybe they'll be redeemed later as all bad guys are on Doctor Who these days...? No losers, no bad guys and despite the nightmares it all ends with a big panto exit...sugar and spice and all things nice....
“Ne vous mêlez pas du pain”
-
aufbahrung - Name: Your Real Name
- Posts: 1579
- Country: United Kingdom
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1752 by newolder » Jan 01, 2020 8:29 pm
I guess you won't be watching any more then. That'll be nice.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
newolder - Name: Albert Ross
- Posts: 7876
- Age: 1
- Country: Feudal Estate number 9
-
aufbahrung - Name: Your Real Name
- Posts: 1579
- Country: United Kingdom
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1754 by Fallible » Jan 01, 2020 11:40 pm
newolder wrote:I guess you won't be watching any more then. That'll be nice.
From his synopsis, I think he was watching a different programme anyway.
She battled through in every kind of tribulation,
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
She revelled in adventure and imagination.
She never listened to no hater, liar,
Breaking boundaries and chasing fire.
Oh, my my! Oh my, she flies!
-
Fallible - RS Donator
- Name: Alice Pooper
- Posts: 51607
- Age: 50
- Country: Engerland na na
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1755 by Alan B » Jan 03, 2020 6:55 pm
Somehow, the new series doesn't seem to be as 'gripping' as the oldies. Maybe it's my age... 
The stories don't seem to be as 'convincing' such that I used to sit 'glued to the telly' with earlier Docs.
The stories don't seem to be as 'convincing' such that I used to sit 'glued to the telly' with earlier Docs.
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
-
Alan B - Posts: 9999
- Age: 86
- Country: UK (Birmingham)
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1756 by newolder » Jan 03, 2020 7:06 pm
Ah yes, the gripping days of the Cybermen of yore...
Consider me convinced & glued.
Consider me convinced & glued.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
-
newolder - Name: Albert Ross
- Posts: 7876
- Age: 1
- Country: Feudal Estate number 9
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1757 by Alan B » Jan 07, 2020 1:31 pm
Episode 2 has a speech by the villain detailing how everyone on Earth is being watched and all details of their lives recorded and stored...
Yeah. As if that could ever happen...
Yeah. As if that could ever happen...
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
-
Alan B - Posts: 9999
- Age: 86
- Country: UK (Birmingham)
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1758 by Agi Hammerthief » Mar 08, 2020 4:28 pm
Alan B wrote:Episode 2 has a speech by the villain detailing how everyone on Earth is being watched and all details of their lives recorded and stored...
Yeah. As if that could ever happen...
they cast Pichai Sundararajan as a villain? amazing!!
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
-
Agi Hammerthief - Posts: 3080
- Age: 49
- Country: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1759 by Agi Hammerthief » Oct 03, 2020 7:24 pm
got around to watch "Resolution" last week, not half as bad as I feared, but now I can put my finger on why Chibnall as Showrunner sucks: It's this "personal problems" layer which feels overly pronounced and "plot irrelevant" in Series 11.
* my (modified) emphasis ( or 'interpretation' )
-
Agi Hammerthief - Posts: 3080
- Age: 49
- Country: .de
Re: Doctor Who [SPOILERS]
#1760 by DougC » Jan 04, 2021 8:28 am
Apparently John Bishop is going to be in the next season.
Is the plan to work through every British comedian as companion?
I draw the line at Michael MacIntyre, although Frankie Boyle would be interesting.
Is the plan to work through every British comedian as companion?
I draw the line at Michael MacIntyre, although Frankie Boyle would be interesting.
To do, is to be (Socrate)
To be, is to do (Sartre)
Do be do be do (Sinatra)
SUBWAY(1985)
To be, is to do (Sartre)
Do be do be do (Sinatra)
SUBWAY(1985)
- DougC
- Posts: 14615
- Age: 50
- Country: UNITED Kingdom
Who is online
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest