aufbahrung wrote:Not a bad Dracula though, but generic and mundane and so predictable. Almost but not quite there. You can't beat authenticity.
An authentic Dracula? Now, there's a novel idea.
Moderators: Blip, The_Metatron
aufbahrung wrote:Not a bad Dracula though, but generic and mundane and so predictable. Almost but not quite there. You can't beat authenticity.
Fallible wrote:
Cool! And I take it the mist is the authentic fog he brings down himself?
Britain is expected to achieve its zero-carbon targets almost thirty years early after Bram Stoker was discovered to be spinning in his grave at over 72,000 rpm overnight.
Seismologists had noticed a faint hum from Stoker’s last resting place on Thursday evening, which rose to a staggering speed at about 9:15 yesterday evening and shows no sign of abating.
”We quickly plugged him into a turbine and now he’s powering Wales and most of the South West on his tod,” explained power engineer Simon Williams.
”It’s a mystery what might have caused this to happen. Stoker has occasionally shifted in his eternal sleep – there was what’s known as the ‘Keanu disturbance’ in 1992, for example, but this is unprecedented.
aufbahrung wrote:Imagine anyone with body dismorphia or seriously disfigured through burns who watched got themselves a dose of PTSD. Let alone any who'd just been to a cremation of some relative. Seems Moffat cares about shocking his audience rather than the outliers in his audience who might be more traumatised than shocked - didn't cross a actual line but crossed a spirit of a line...class it as breaching the wall of good taste, in places.
BlackBart wrote:aufbahrung wrote:Imagine anyone with body dismorphia or seriously disfigured through burns who watched got themselves a dose of PTSD. Let alone any who'd just been to a cremation of some relative. Seems Moffat cares about shocking his audience rather than the outliers in his audience who might be more traumatised than shocked - didn't cross a actual line but crossed a spirit of a line...class it as breaching the wall of good taste, in places.
Its horror Einstein.
Fallible wrote:Tu est très perspicace, ma amie.
Spearthrower wrote:Let me just verify this:
Calling people cuntz is not a personal attack?
Does just changing one letter make any normally abusive word ok with respect to the FUA?
So if I call someone a kunt, it's perfectly permissible within the rules here?
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2 ... z#p2726098You cuntz should be praising the seven seas that there's still someone smart and courageous enough here to stand up to your collective shit.
Svartalf wrote:
define 'authentic' as pertains to Dracula? no movie or series ever made on the subject was ever faithful in the least to the Stoker original... and Stoker just pieced his vampire from a variety of sources and grafted the name of a medieval ruler known for hideous cruelty on it, nothing authentic there either.
Fallible wrote:Well, I bet you never thought that joke would lead to this situation when you wrote it, Hermit.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest