Animavore wrote:Rumraket wrote:Mick wrote:Rumraket wrote:
What does that even mean? As a christian, surely you believe in a soul and an afterlife?
I'm sorry that you don't want to shoulder your burden of proof.
It means that the idea of disembodied minds like that in Ghost are simply not part of Thomist thought.
I will shoulder a burden of proof. The objection was that your burden is lighter, and that is typical of atheists here on RS.
Once again you missed a question.
I think it's really just the nature of the topic. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I'm not sure how you would even argue the opposite, that there are no disembodied minds. You're not omniscient.
I'm sure Mick knows this, of course.
An argument from principle. Take Teuton. He thinks that it is a matter of principle that disembodied minds cannot exist.