Physiognomy

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else.

Moderators: kiore, The_Metatron, Blip

Re: Physiognomy

#41  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 2:14 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:I'll stick with love is love. It has a nice ring to it.


It also runs fairly diametrically to what you started with.

Still, at least there's a degree of refreshment to it, in that people who wear their Christianity the way you do are often found to be opposed to such notions, at least where some demographics are concerned.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#42  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 2:37 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:I'll stick with love is love. It has a nice ring to it.


It also runs fairly diametrically to what you started with.

Still, at least there's a degree of refreshment to it, in that people who wear their Christianity the way you do are often found to be opposed to such notions, at least where some demographics are concerned.


Not sure what you're getting at. You'll have to spell it out. Your prejudgment, that is.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#43  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 2:52 pm

Not a prejudice, a post-judice, with voluminous supporting evidence.

The phrase 'love is love' is deeply associated with opposing homophobic rhetoric, the latter being very much a feature of many of those strains of Christianity whose adherents feel it necessary to declare their toxic idiocy up front, not least because their toxic idiocy often extends far beyond their advertising their silly masturbation fantasy.

You seem to be cycling through common phrases expressing solidarity with oppressed demographics, all phrases routinely employed by the sort of people you'd describe as lefties which, after having voiced your disagreement with almost everything they say in your original signature, a crystal-clear expression of bigotry, is fairly obvious and quite obnoxious trolling by parroting those you describe as loonies. It's a form of concern-trolling, and it's absolutely nothing either new or clever. Trust me, we've seen it all here, as well as your other transparent tactics, like JAQing off, tone-policing and generally just measuring up predictably with every other one of your ilk who bowled up here.

Obvious troll is obvious.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#44  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 3:10 pm

You're assuming you know my stance on various topics. Topics that we haven't even discussed. Nice try.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#45  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 3:28 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:You're assuming you know my stance on various topics. Topics that we haven't even discussed.


I'm assuming nothing, because you fucking stated your stance in your signature, nasty troll.

Nice try.


I love how you think you're doing well here.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#46  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 3:34 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:You're assuming you know my stance on various topics. Topics that we haven't even discussed.


I'm assuming nothing, because you fucking stated your stance in your signature, nasty troll.

Nice try.


I love how you think you're doing well here.


If you could pause with the anger and lashing out for just a moment, is there any particular topic that you think you know my stance on?
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#47  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 3:40 pm

There's no anger here, which once again goes to your ability to psychoanalyse people via text alone, so shut the fuck up about my tone.

I know your stance on quite a few topics, not least that you aren't aligned with any but two of the items that have appeared in your signature. Unless you're simply pretending to be a fuckwitted, bigoted, nasty little cunt to troll us, which is little different.

I know nothing about you, but your behaviour is disgusting, and worthy of excoriation.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#48  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 3:47 pm

hackenslash wrote:I know nothing about you


And yet apparently you know my stance on quite a few topics. I don't suppose you'll actually be bothering to mention any of them any time soon.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#49  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 3:56 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:
hackenslash wrote:I know nothing about you


And yet apparently you know my stance on quite a few topics.


Yes, because you've openly expressed your stance on an entire range of topics in your original signature. It's not like I haven't already beaten you about the fucking head with this until the rest of us are getting a bit punch-drunk.

I don't suppose you'll actually be bothering to mention any of them any time soon.


I already did.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#50  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 4:01 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
you've openly expressed your stance on an entire range of topics in your original signature.


I put phrases in my signature. Oh dear, let me try another way. For example what's my stance on LGBT? Please quote what I have said about that topic for reference.

Or of course you could write more pseudo intellectual drivel without actually addressing anything. Up to you.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#51  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 4:08 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:For example what's my stance on LGBT? Please quote what I have said about that topic for reference.


That you disagree with loonie lefties.

Or of course you could write more pseudo intellectual drivel without actually addressing anything. Up to you.


I don't think you're in a position to determine whether intellect is faux or real, frankly. You haven't the skillset.
Last edited by hackenslash on Jan 16, 2022 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#52  Postby Regina » Jan 16, 2022 4:48 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:Is it true that you can tell a lot about a person's character by their face, or it that just an old ex wive's tale? Has anybody here ever made a correct judgment about someone based on their looks?

Tell you what: I haven‘t seen most people‘s faces on here. But surprisingly, it has turned out not to be necessary at all in order to decide whether they‘re bullshitters or not.
No, they ain't makin' Jews like Jesus anymore,
They don't turn the other cheek the way they done before.

Kinky Friedman
Regina
 
Posts: 15690
Male

Djibouti (dj)
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#53  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 6:10 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:For example what's my stance on LGBT? Please quote what I have said about that topic for reference.


That you disagree with loonie lefties.


That's hardly specific, Einstein. So you're assuming that I think gays are degenerate or something? Charming.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#54  Postby The_Metatron » Jan 16, 2022 6:43 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:For example what's my stance on LGBT? Please quote what I have said about that topic for reference.


That you disagree with loonie lefties.


That's hardly specific, Einstein. So you're assuming that I think gays are degenerate or something? Charming.

Well, do you think that? Here’s yours chance to set us straight.

Commit to it.
I AM Skepdickus!

Check out Hack's blog, too. He writes good.
User avatar
The_Metatron
Moderator
 
Name: Jesse
Posts: 21494
Age: 59
Male

Country: United States
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#55  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 7:27 pm

The_Metatron wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:
hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:For example what's my stance on LGBT? Please quote what I have said about that topic for reference.


That you disagree with loonie lefties.


That's hardly specific, Einstein. So you're assuming that I think gays are degenerate or something? Charming.

Well, do you think that? Here’s yours chance to set us straight.

Commit to it.


No, I do not think that. I hope that has straightened out the matter, so to speak. Incidentally, why does the LGBT keep elongating their acronym? If they keep expanding it the term will become meaningless.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#56  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 8:08 pm

Jesus Is Lord wrote:No, I do not think that. I hope that has straightened out the matter, so to speak.


Spidey-sense tingling, but OK.

Incidentally, why does the LGBT keep elongating their acronym? If they keep expanding it the term will become meaningless.


And the spidey-sense has ramped again. This is such a dumb question it supports my scepticism of your earlier claim. The simple route to answering that question would be to google it, rather than ask such a bigoted question on a public forum. For example, you could find out what the letters stand for, and see if you can work out why additions might be necessary, especially in a climate of such bigotry.

As we uncover the oppression inherent in society, largely a result of religious fuckwittery, we learn more about it, and about ourselves. Each letter of that acronym means something, and has import.

And just so you understand why I'm calling your question bigoted, let me lay it out for you, so you can't go JAQing off with your pathetic bollocks again:

ANY question concerning the manner in which an oppressed group expresses itself is challenging that expression, and asserting your perceived entitlement to control a discussion you have no entitlement to even engage in. It's exactly the same as asking why sportsmen take a knee at every game. If only they'd protest within the little comfortable box YOU want to put them in. Well, fuck that hard, and then fuck it some more.
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#57  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 9:33 pm

hackenslash wrote:
Jesus Is Lord wrote:No, I do not think that. I hope that has straightened out the matter, so to speak.


Spidey-sense tingling, but OK.

Incidentally, why does the LGBT keep elongating their acronym? If they keep expanding it the term will become meaningless.


And the spidey-sense has ramped again. This is such a dumb question it supports my scepticism of your earlier claim. The simple route to answering that question would be to google it, rather than ask such a bigoted question on a public forum. For example, you could find out what the letters stand for, and see if you can work out why additions might be necessary, especially in a climate of such bigotry.

As we uncover the oppression inherent in society, largely a result of religious fuckwittery, we learn more about it, and about ourselves. Each letter of that acronym means something, and has import.

And just so you understand why I'm calling your question bigoted, let me lay it out for you, so you can't go JAQing off with your pathetic bollocks again:

ANY question concerning the manner in which an oppressed group expresses itself is challenging that expression, and asserting your perceived entitlement to control a discussion you have no entitlement to even engage in. It's exactly the same as asking why sportsmen take a knee at every game. If only they'd protest within the little comfortable box YOU want to put them in. Well, fuck that hard, and then fuck it some more.


Get a life dude, seriously. Who talks like that. By the way the knee thing, that's pretty stupid.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#58  Postby hackenslash » Jan 16, 2022 9:41 pm

There you go. That's the complete set. There's no bigotry you don't just embrace with open arms, is there?
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 22910
Age: 53
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#59  Postby Jesus Is Lord » Jan 16, 2022 9:47 pm

hackenslash wrote:There you go. That's the complete set. There's no bigotry you don't just embrace with open arms, is there?


Hey man, if you want to get down on one knee for black people you go ahead. I know plenty of black people who would laugh in your face for such a stupid condescending move. But then again, I suppose the fear of being called a waaaaythist is just too much for some.
Refugees welcome.
User avatar
Jesus Is Lord
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 64

Print view this post

Re: Physiognomy

#60  Postby The_Piper » Jan 16, 2022 10:07 pm

Wasn't it funny how Trump and his flock would say, during the BLM protests, that he's a fan of peaceful protest. This after he said he'd fire any athlete who knelt during the national anthem. That was peaceful protest.
"There are two ways to view the stars; as they really are, and as we might wish them to be." - Carl Sagan
"If an argument lasts more than five minutes, both parties are wrong" unknown
Self Taken Pictures of Wildlife
User avatar
The_Piper
 
Name: Fletch F. Fletch
Posts: 29632
Age: 47
Male

Country: Chainsaw Country
United States (us)
Print view this post

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest