It seems like many people use the words "skepticism" and "critical thinking" more or less interchangeably. For instance here. The banner of the Skeptic site says that they're "Promoting SCIENCE and CRITICAL THINKING".
However, some people do make a difference between the terms. One of them is Robert Todd Carroll, author of The Skeptic's Dictionary, who in his book Becoming a Critical Thinker, seems to regards skepticism as one of the attributes of a critical thinker. Here is another view of thew difference. What he is saying is that skepticism is debunking unlikely claims about the paranormal as well as conspiracy theories, whereas critical thinking is broader - it applies to everything.
So what do you think? Are there any differences between skepticism and critical thinking? If there is, then can one in any case be one without being the other?
I can notice that skepticism is not a positice word to everyone - woo believers consider it to be closed-mindedness. But critical thinking seems to be. I'd say almost everyone - even believers in the most strange of things - consider themselves to be critical thinkers.
This might be a semantics issue, but I think it would be of benefit to have these two terms more clearly defined, given that they're used quite often.