Right at the end of this video, his 5th "mysterious artifact" that can't be explained actually can be with a quick 30 second google search.
According to this idiot's youtube video, the hammer is nearly "500 million years old" and is "so old it's starting to turn to coal"
Except its only several magnitudes of centuries younger than this twerp is claiming. It's the last 30 seconds of so of the video. My google search came back with this...
Finally, in the late 1990's Baugh supporter David Lines reported on a web site (Lines, 1997, 1999) that carbon 14 dating had "recently" been done on a specimen from the inside of the handle, and that the results "showed inconclusive dates ranging from the present to 700 years ago." No information was given by Lines about when or where the dating was done, nor was any formal report referenced. The date range also seems a little curious, since most C14 labs report a date with a plus-or-minus margin of error, rather than a wide range. Perhaps a number of tests were done with different results, but Lines does not clarify this. Evidently preferring a date in the thousands of years, Lines asserted that the dating results provided "graphic evidence that the handle has been contaminated by current organic substances." However, C14 labs have ways of minimizing modern carbon contamination, and it would not likely produce ages orders of magnitude in error.
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm
Considering the video was posted last year, June 2015 and this article predates that, why make yourself look like a cock?