New 2020 Election Documentary

mindhack · **#781** by **mindhack** » Jun 23, 2022 11:05 am

A sound decision, Blip! With the dirty mouthed meanie gone, and the honest researcher freed from bullying, the forum is now in a better place. Well done. Fuck this.

felltoearth · **#782** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 11:31 am

His presence literally chases people away from fora. He is not here in good faith. I don’t know why, with such trolling, he is still here.

Fenrir · **#783** by **Fenrir** » Jun 23, 2022 12:22 pm

Self-inflicted head wound

Pudendum · **#784** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 2:58 pm

DeSouza suggested that this was after these GOP folk watched 2000 Mules. ALMOST claiming his mockumentary was the cause.

: Untitled-1.png (425.28 KiB) Viewed 259 times

here is the Timcast version. (Mr. Norman makes no connection to the film)

https://timcast.com/news/texas-republic ... ification/

“We believe that the 2020 election violated Article 1 and 2 of the US Constitution, that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their elections in multiple ways, including by allowing ballots to be received after November 3, 2020,” the resolution reads. “We believe that substantial election fraud in key metropolitan areas significantly affected the results in five key states in favor of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.”

While some of the GOP lawmakers who met in Houston for the party’s annual state convention assert that the 2020 election was stolen, and others say there was no amount of fraud that would have changed the outcome, to date, claims of election fraud in the 2020 election have yet to be adjudicated in a court of law.

felltoearth · **#785** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 5:17 pm

D’Souzelusional

Pudendum · **#786** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 5:43 pm

felltoearth wrote:D’Souzelusional

He's the only one making the connection between his film, and this motion. At least as far as I can tell.

So while the motion seems legit, the marketing wank is strong with him

felltoearth · **#787** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 5:49 pm

The whole thing is a clown circus. They deserve each other. Whether there is a connection or not is irrelevant

Pudendum · **#788** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 5:56 pm

felltoearth wrote:The whole thing is a clown circus. They deserve each other. Whether there is a connection or not is irrelevant

Well, clown circus or no, the filmmakers are still threatening a third act.

A popular right-wing meme is about grabbing some popcorn and watching the show. It's a fun one. Works for either side, when justice is expected to be on parade.

:popcorn:

felltoearth · **#789** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 6:31 pm

Well, once again your posts are obtuse. I have no idea what you’re talking about

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pudendum · **#790** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 6:36 pm

felltoearth wrote:Well, once again your posts are obtuse. I have no idea what you’re talking about

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The filmmakers (the film this thread is about) have been 'teasing' about having another disclosure of some kind.

A 'third act' to their drama.

Or did you not get that popcorn is a current meme ?

felltoearth · **#791** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 6:41 pm

Popcorn isn’t a current meme. It’s quite old.

We even have our own emoticon :popcorn:

The rest was gibberish.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pudendum · **#792** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 6:47 pm

Of course you are right about the popcorn. It's an old meme that has surged in use among those watching Durham reveal his investigation results.

As to what you call 'gibberish', if you can say what you don't understand, I can try explaining it. If understanding was your goal, I mean.

Otherwise, the rest of your comment is, indeed, gibberish.

felltoearth · **#793** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 7:24 pm

I give others the benefit of the doubt. You, nope.

If you can’t be clear, that’s not my issue.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pudendum · **#794** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 8:38 pm

felltoearth wrote:I give others the benefit of the doubt. You, nope.

If you can’t be clear, that’s not my issue.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well, I believe you when you say you don't understand.

But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

felltoearth · **#795** by **felltoearth** » Jun 23, 2022 8:56 pm

When you demonstrate honesty in discussion, I will take this thread seriously.

Meanwhile

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pudendum · **#796** by **Pudendum** » Jun 23, 2022 9:07 pm

felltoearth wrote:When you demonstrate honesty in discussion, I will take this thread seriously.[

If you were willing to admit and clarify what you didn't understand, your opinion would mean more than gibberish to me.

Meanwhile

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Does this relate to the movie somehow? Or something based off your earlier misunderstanding?

THWOTH · **#797** by **THWOTH** » Jun 24, 2022 2:43 pm

Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

Pudendum · **#798** by **Pudendum** » Jun 24, 2022 3:27 pm

THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

How would I know?

THWOTH · **#799** by **THWOTH** » Jun 24, 2022 3:46 pm

Pudendum wrote:
THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

How would I know?

Perhaps you have a neurological condition, one that causes you to instantly forget what you've typed as soon as you hit submit? I'm curious why you're so keen to apply certain standards to the posts of others that you don't apply to your own. Any ideas?

Pudendum · **#800** by **Pudendum** » Jun 24, 2022 3:51 pm

THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
THWOTH wrote:
Pudendum wrote:
But if your unspecified lack of understanding leads to you having conclusions, don't expect me to take them seriously.

Lack of understanding about what?

How would I know?

Perhaps you have a neurological conditions, one that causes you to instantly forget what you've typed as soon as you hit submit? I'm curious why you're so keen to apply certain standards to the posts of others that you don't apply to your own. Any ideas?

lol

so you don't know what felltoearth was talking about either?

If I knew what they misunderstood, I could try to have a go at explaining. If you knew, you could explain.

If you had a comment about the movie, I might be more interested. As it is though, it sounds like you are trying to make some point. Be clearer, if you want to. Unless your neurological condition prevents you.

New 2020 Election Documentary

Have you seen '2000 Mules'

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Re: New 2020 Election Documentary

Who is online