Do we have any rational explanation for this case?
Moderators: Calilasseia, DarthHelmet86, Onyx8
mercy18 wrote:The Legendary ‘Sword in the Stone’which was discovered at Montesiepi Chapel in Italy, and belongs to St. Galgano Guidotti.
laklak wrote:That dude from Turin left it there.
hackenslash wrote:
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
readers should be informed that the sword was easily removable from the stone until 1924, when the crevice was filled with lead.
Blackadder wrote:From a rather more scientific source
https://archive.archaeology.org/0201/newsbriefs/sword.html
I quotereaders should be informed that the sword was easily removable from the stone until 1924, when the crevice was filled with lead.
hackenslash wrote:My explanation is that Simon de Montfort (1208-1265) knew about it and incorporated it into his writings, which were the source of the modern legend, compiled by Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
hackenslash wrote:My explanation is that Simon de Montfort (1208-1265) knew about it and incorporated it into his writings, which were the source of the modern legend, compiled by Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
Thomas Eshuis wrote:... the pseudohistoric account by the 10th century cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth?
Thomas Eshuis wrote:hackenslash wrote:My explanation is that Simon de Montfort (1208-1265) knew about it and incorporated it into his writings, which were the source of the modern legend, compiled by Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
Are you also going to look into the Roman-Briton person mentioned by the 9th century monk Nunnius and the pseudohistoric account by the 10th century cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth?
hackenslash wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:hackenslash wrote:My explanation is that Simon de Montfort (1208-1265) knew about it and incorporated it into his writings, which were the source of the modern legend, compiled by Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
Are you also going to look into the Roman-Briton person mentioned by the 9th century monk Nunnius and the pseudohistoric account by the 10th century cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth?
Already did, though Arturis wasn't Roman-Briton, he was a Rusky, from the Steppes.
hackenslash wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:hackenslash wrote:My explanation is that Simon de Montfort (1208-1265) knew about it and incorporated it into his writings, which were the source of the modern legend, compiled by Thomas Mallory in the 15th century.
There are those hereabouts who will recall that I spent more than five years tracking Arthurian tales to source. I considered writing a book about it at one point.
Are you also going to look into the Roman-Briton person mentioned by the 9th century monk Nunnius and the pseudohistoric account by the 12th century cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth?
Already did, though Arturis wasn't Roman-Briton, he was a Rusky, from the Steppes.
Svartalf wrote:
WTF?
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest