Craig answers a member of this forum-Angra Mainyu

#1 · #1 by **Mick** » Jan 09, 2012 12:39 am

A member who posts here by the name of Angra Mainyu has one of his arguments the focus Craig's weekly question.

Here's Angra
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1 ... l#p1019200

Here's Craig responding to some other fellow who put forth Angra's argument.

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/Pag ... me=q_and_a

Kudos to Angra for at least making a prima facie case for a contradiction. Frankly, I have no idea if Craig was able to escape it. I dont study this sort of stuff.

#2 · #2 by **Bribase** » Jan 09, 2012 12:46 am

Well spotted.

#3 · #3 by **RealityRules** » Jan 10, 2012 4:22 am

The link seems to be at the bottom of that page provided by Mick ...
a link to this one ... http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9269

Interestingly, the current link provided by Mick - to Q & A - http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/PageServer?pagename=q_and_a is to Question 247 Subject: Muslim Objections to Jesus' Deity which has a very arrogant answer by Craig.

#4 · #4 by **Mick** » Jan 10, 2012 4:27 am

Ah, the link changed. He updated his stuff.

#5 · #5 by **Angra Mainyu** » Jan 10, 2012 2:50 pm

Mick wrote:A member who posts here by the name of Angra Mainyu has one of his arguments the focus Craig's weekly question.

Here's Angra
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1 ... l#p1019200

Here's Craig responding to some other fellow who put forth Angra's argument.

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/Pag ... me=q_and_a

Kudos to Angra for at least making a prima facie case for a contradiction. Frankly, I have no idea if Craig was able to escape it. I dont study this sort of stuff.

Thanks; I maintain that he did not.

I posted an updated case against the KCA here, addressing Craig's reply, and arguing that he fails to get out of the contradiction; the specific part about Craig's reply is in section 9.