Calilasseia wrote: Translation: "I can't be bothered addressing your points, and don't have any answers to them, so I'll dismiss them with a one line piece of snide condescension".

Calilasseia wrote:Please, use the forum search function and find out how "imaginary" these are. Speaking of imaginary entities, got any evidence for your magic man? I keep asking supernaturalists to provide this, and they keep failing. Plus, I notice you didn't have an answer to my rebuttal of your farcical assertion, that the propensity of a group of homicidal nomads to win wars against unprepared opposition, somehow validated your magic man. But then I'm used to such displays of discoursive indolence on the part of supernaturalists.

Calilasseia wrote:Well since YOU are the one who is engaging in snide, condescending dismissal of my numerous points, I think we're entitled to see YOU provide some substance to support your assertions. That is, of course, if you have any. You can start by telling us all, what real evidence exists to support the assertion that your magic man exists. That should keep you occupied for a little while.