Information Theory, Complexity, & Dawkins' 747 (help?)

Christianity, Islam, Other Religions & Belief Systems.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Information Theory, Complexity, & Dawkins' 747 (help?)

#341  Postby xrayzed » Oct 05, 2010 11:41 pm

Shrunk wrote:
xrayzed wrote:I’ll try to simplify the question:

Why is it entirely reasonable that there can be a conscious being that has always existed, but it is inconceivable that there can be a non-conscious thing that has always existed?


Since Maryann has left the building, I'll give your question a crack: It's hard to tell thru her turgid prose and convoluted logic, but her point seems to be that you can't demonstrate the existence of either, so then atheism is a position of faith just as much as theism is.

By that logic, the following statement is also true: Suppose two doctors are treating a patient who seems to have an infection, but the identity of the pathogen is unknown. The first doctor believes the illness is caused by an as-yet unknown virus or bacteria and endeavours to find the correct one. The second doctor believes the patient is cursed by Zeus and sacrifices a bull to appease the god.

The positions of both doctors are equally based on faith.

Like you I'm often struggling to work out what Maryann is trying to say, but I think she is saying more than that. It's not just that both are positions of faith, but that her position of faith is reasonable, while the non-theistic position is unreasonable.

I'm basing that my interpretation on posts such as this:

Ichthus77 wrote:Both the atheist and theist conclusions require faith (but the self-bootstrapping atheist conclusion--that one requires blind faith--in the teeth of counter-evidence).


So in terms of your model she isn't saying that the Zeus theory of disease is equal to the Germ theory of disease, but that it's clearly superior.

What I haven't been able to glean from her posts is any coherent reasoning in support of this.
A thinking creationist is an oxymoron. A non-thinking creationist is just a moron.
(Source: johannessiig, here)
User avatar
xrayzed
 
Posts: 1053
Age: 65
Male

Jolly Roger (arr)
Print view this post

Re: Information Theory, Complexity, & Dawkins' 747 (help?)

#342  Postby hotshoe » Oct 06, 2010 3:35 am

Maryann is also a Flood-apologist (if not a true Flood believer - it's hard to tell from the crap she writes in her blog) as, for example, she mocks Steven Wells of the Skeptic's Annotated Bible for asking the completely-reasonable question of "how did all the mountain tops get covered?" Maryann's insane response: a link to the goddamn liars at AIG.

Completely ignorant religious delusion dressed up in sassy words.

There isn't any coherent reasoning.
Now, when I talked to God I knew he'd understand
He said, "Stick by my side and I'll be your guiding hand
But don't ask me what I think of you
I might not give the answer that you want me to"
hotshoe
 
Posts: 3177

United States (us)
Print view this post

Previous

Return to Theism

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest