Alan B wrote:Since when is a knowingly false assertion not a lie?
Now, if the collection plate proceeds were all used for charity work with zero going to church and clerical upkeep, then yes, that would be OK.
But in all likely-hood, the proceeds will find its way into the pockets of church and staff thereby supporting the false assertion that a deity exists.
If they say "None of this money will be used for church expenses, including salaries," then, yes, that would be fraud. I don't believe that is the understanding people have when putting money in the collection plate, though, is it?
That last bit, about supporting the false assertion that a deity exists, is a non sequitur. The church and the congregation have both come to the belief that a particular god exists, for whatever reason. That's not fraud, just poor critical thinking.