The_Metatron wrote:How do you know o much about the Omnicunt?

pornhub?

Matthew Shute wrote:The onlyA position which allSOME atheists share is the position that theism is an error.

FIFY

The only position that all atheists share is a lack of belief in god/s.

The position that you described is what is commonly referred to as 'strong atheism' (i.e. that god/s do not exist).

ispoketoanangel wrote:Oh, look who's making a guest appearance... Epicurus! If a 2000 y.o. gay Greek sez so, it MUST be true!

Irrelevant. 2+2=4 could have never been uttered by a thinking entity and it would still be true.

Whether Epicurus actually existed or not, or when, is secondary to the weight of the argument. What matters is what the words mean, not who said them or when they were said.

ispoketoanangel wrote:When will atheists understand that according to Christians, the ultimate purpose of life on Earth is NOT happiness.

Oh don't you worry, we're all perfectly clear on that.

ispoketoanangel wrote:It is to form a relation with God, accept Him and spend the eternity with Him.

One wonders why he would hide his existence from us so well then.

ispoketoanangel wrote:God - according to Christianity - does not stop evil because evil IS part of His plan.

Then I'm grateful there's no evidence to believe the christian god exists.

ispoketoanangel wrote:And only in a universe with evil can people make significant moral decisions.

Including god, which means his inaction against gratuitous evil is immoral.

ispoketoanangel wrote:Evil HAS a purpose.

Yeah it's continued existence seems to disprove the existence of god.

ispoketoanangel wrote:Hello Oldskeptic,

I have been told it is against the FUA agreement to modify the username when you quote another user. Please edit your post ASAP!!

Kind regards

But it is one of your former usernames.

ispoketoanangel wrote:

Matthew Shute wrote:

So children get bone cancer so that God can have his cosmic morality-based game-show. This hardly speaks of a purely benevolent deity, does it?

That's your subjective opinion.

And that's your non-answer.

The_Metatron wrote:

Paula wrote:

The_Metatron wrote:

chairman bill wrote:Sorry, but is there a rule that says God can't be a complete & utter cunt of the highest order? Clearly omnibenevolence isn't aprt of God's character. Omnicuntishness is. It's not rocket science.

Praise be the omnicunt.

He could be the Omnicunt Prime, Transformer God!

I think we have a new meme.

The Omnicunt be praised.

Hold on a moment. cunts are very useful.

Oldskeptic wrote:

Atheistsarevermin wrote:Oh, look who's making a guest appearance... Epicurus! If a 2000 y.o. gay Greek sez so, it MUST be true!

If your asserting that Epicurus was gay because he never married then I will point out that Jesus never married either. And there is more evidence for Jesus being gay than Epicurus.

One might well ask what exactly was going on in the garden of Gesthemane. See G Mark 14:51-52

Smooching nothing. The young man was nude. There was more hanky panky than just smooching I tell ya!!