
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-Com ... 66505.html
Split from believers' battiness thread
Moderators: Blip, DarthHelmet86
laklak wrote:What position?
Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:I like my signature and avatar. Can't please everyone.
Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic,
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Since the topic is about theism, atheism and science it's perfectly on topic to point out that your signature is counterfactual claim.
Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Since the topic is about theism, atheism and science it's perfectly on topic to point out that your signature is counterfactual claim.
Pebble wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Since the topic is about theism, atheism and science it's perfectly on topic to point out that your signature is counterfactual claim.
But since PK does not rely on facts or logic for his/her claims, what is the issue?
Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pebble wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Since the topic is about theism, atheism and science it's perfectly on topic to point out that your signature is counterfactual claim.
But since PK does not rely on facts or logic for his/her claims, what is the issue?
The issue is that in science, the burden proof lies with the claimant, so where it concerns the question of (a)theism, the burden of proof lies with theists. And not as PK's signature asserts, atheists.
Pebble wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:
The issue is that in science, the burden proof lies with the claimant, so where it concerns the question of (a)theism, the burden of proof lies with theists. And not as PK's signature asserts, atheists.
Yes, but where has PK shown any signs of being interested in science? Ignorance combined with certainty is all I see.
Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pebble wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:
The issue is that in science, the burden proof lies with the claimant, so where it concerns the question of (a)theism, the burden of proof lies with theists. And not as PK's signature asserts, atheists.
Yes, but where has PK shown any signs of being interested in science? Ignorance combined with certainty is all I see.
I don't see how that's relevant to my original comment being on-topic or not.
Macdoc wrote:Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic,
Is it ?? Try wandering into a gay bar with Fuck gays on your Tshirt.
It's about where you are on this atheist forum.....expect to be swung at ....all the time
From where I stand - your just another rather ignorant troll ..nothing you've done has dissuaded me.
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:[If you're all going to get this emotional over my sig and avatar, God knows how you manage to get through the day. I shall pray for you.
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:
This isn't an atheist forum. And I don't care about the opinions of strangers on the internet who mean nothing whatsoever to me.
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:If you're all going to get this emotional over my sig and avatar,...
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:God knows how you manage to get through the day. I shall pray for you.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest