Thomas Eshuis wrote:1. The character of our universe is determined by physical laws and constants.
2. If these laws and constants had been different, life would probably not have arisen.
3. The laws and constants which led to this suitability for life must have been determined by either physical necessity, chance or design.
4. The laws and constants have not been determined by physical necessity.
5. The laws and constants have not been determined by chance.
6. Therefore our universe was designed.
So accepting the existence of this constant defining creator:
1. The character of our universe is determined by physical laws and constants.
2. If these laws and constants had been different, life would probably not have arisen.
3. The laws and constants were determined by the mental configuration of the creator entity.
4. If the mental configuration of the creator entity had been different, it would have chosen different values for the laws and constants.
5. From 2 and 4, therefore if the mental configuration of the creator entity had been different, life would probably have not arisen.
6. The creator entity's mental configuration which led to it choosing constants suitable for life must have been determined by either physical necessity, chance or design.
7. The creator entity's mental configuration has not been determined by physical necessity.
8. The creator entity's mental configuration has not been determined by chance.
9. Therefore the creator entity was designed.
And of course, by the same reasoning the designer of the creator entity must have been designed, and so forth.
Never ascribe to stupidity that which is the logical consequence of malice.