Why this scientist believes in GOD

Confusing science with answering why questions

Christianity, Islam, Other Religions & Belief Systems.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#41  Postby Animavore » Apr 25, 2014 10:23 am

Thomas Eshuis wrote:I've nothing against Collins being a Christian. Just disappointed that this is presented as evidence for Christianity, that a scientist converted to it.

In fairness, It's no worse than any of other evidence presented.
A most evolved electron.
User avatar
Animavore
 
Name: The Scribbler
Posts: 45108
Age: 45
Male

Ireland (ie)
Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#42  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Apr 25, 2014 11:33 am

Animavore wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:I've nothing against Collins being a Christian. Just disappointed that this is presented as evidence for Christianity, that a scientist converted to it.

In fairness, It's no worse than any of other evidence presented.

Never said it was.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 31091
Age: 34
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#43  Postby Bribase » Apr 25, 2014 11:49 am

ElDiablo wrote:I don't know anything about Collins except what's in that video and I see nothing wrong with his personal revelation. If that's what he believes, so what. if he's good at what he does that's what counts.


Of course it would be silly to have a problem with Collins believing what he does. The main issue I have with the interview was the parroting of the moral argument as if the ubiquity of moral beliefs is some kind of foregone conclusion. The fact is that it's not ubiquitous and the argument is nonsense.
User avatar
Bribase
 
Posts: 2671
Age: 42
Male

Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#44  Postby Animavore » Apr 25, 2014 11:53 am

I think it's a massive non-sequitur to say, morals therefore God. One might as well say, humour therefore Bertie Ahern, such is the train of thought. And why do people have to think that morals have to come from 'out there' somewhere. No one really says that about any other personality trait we have and share.
A most evolved electron.
User avatar
Animavore
 
Name: The Scribbler
Posts: 45108
Age: 45
Male

Ireland (ie)
Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#45  Postby Alan B » Apr 25, 2014 12:41 pm

Calilasseia wrote:
Mick wrote:"Confusing science with answering why questions"

Patient: Why is my nose running?
Doctor: Sorry, science doesn't answer that question!

Lol


Got something other than infantile caricature to offer here, Mick?

Because even without professional medical knowledge, I can answer this one.

Patient: "Why is my noise running?"

Me: "The coronaviruses that generated your cold symptoms, resulted in the death of some of your epithelial cells in the mucous membranes of your nose, and the resulting immune response to non-programmed cell death stimulated the remaining epithelial cells (in particular the Bowman's glands in the nasal mucosae) to secrete copious quantities of mucins and IgA, the latter compound itself being an immunoglobulin helping to protect the mucosae against further pathogenic attack. Your runny nose is the visible sign of this increased secretion."

Or, I don't quite understand that, therefore God...
I have NO BELIEF in the existence of a God or gods. I do not have to offer evidence nor do I have to determine absence of evidence because I do not ASSERT that a God does or does not or gods do or do not exist.
User avatar
Alan B
 
Posts: 9999
Age: 87
Male

Country: UK (Birmingham)
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#46  Postby Nebogipfel » Apr 25, 2014 7:38 pm

LucidFlight wrote:Yes, the telos! Science cannot provide the telos of snot. lol.


With deep apologies to Edward Lear and the well known Indian potentate...


WHO, or why, or which, or what,
Is the Telos of Snot?

Is he tall or short, or dark or fair?
Does he sit on a stool or a sofa or chair,
OR SQUAT?
The Telos of Snot?

Is he wise or foolish, young or old?
Does he drink his soup or his coffee cold,
OR HOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he sing or whistle, jabber or talk,
And when riding abroad does he gallop or walk,
OR TROT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he wear a turban, a fez or a hat?
Does he sleep on a matress, a bed, or a mat,
OR A COT,
The Telos of Snot?

When he writes a copy in round-hand size,
Does he cross his T’s and finish his I’s
WITH A DOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Can he write a letter concisely clear
Without a speck or a smudge or a smear
OR BLOT, 25
The Telos of Snot?

Do his people like him extremely well?
Or do they, whenever they can, rebel,
OR PLOT,
At the Telos of Snot?

If he catches them then, either old or young,
Does he have them chopped in pieces or hung,
OR SHOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Do his people prig in the lanes or park?
Or even at times when days are dark,
GARROTTE!
O the Telos of Snot!

Does he study the wants of his own dominion?
Or doesn’t he care for public opinion
A JOT,
The Telos of Snot?

To amuse his mind do the people show him
Pictures, or any one’s last new poem,
OR WHAT,
For the Telos of Snot?

At night if he suddenly screams and wakes,
Do they bring him only a few small cakes,
OR A LOT,
For the Telos of Snot?

Does he live on turnips, tea, or tripe?
Does he like his shawl to be marked with a stripe,
OR A DOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he like to lie on his back in a boat
Like the lady who lived in that isle remote,
SHALLOTT,
The Telos of Snot?

Is he quiet or always making a fuss?
Is his steward a Swiss or a Swede or a Russ,
OR A SCOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he drink small beer from a silver
Or to sleep and snore in a dark green cave,
OR A GROTT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he drink small beer from a silver jug?
Or a bowl? or a glass? or a cup? or a mug?
OR A POT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he beat his wife with a gold-topped pipe,
When she lets the gooseberries grow too ripe,
OR ROT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he wear a white tie when he dines with friends,
And tie it neat in a bow with ends,
OR A KNOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he like new cream and hate mince-pies?
When he looks at the sun does he wink his eyes,
OR NOT,
The Telos of Snot?

Does he teach his subjects to roast and bake?
Does he sail about on an inland lake,
IN A YACHT,
The Telos of Snot.

Some one, or nobody, knows I wot
Who or which or why or what
Is the Telos of Snot.
Once again, the only sensible approach is tentatively to reject the dragon hypothesis, to be open to future physical data, and to wonder what the cause might be that so many apparently sane and sober people share the same strange delusion
-- Carl Sagan
User avatar
Nebogipfel
 
Posts: 2085

Country: Netherlands
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Why this scientist believes in GOD

#47  Postby Moonwatcher » Apr 28, 2014 9:45 pm

Rumraket wrote:Yes, emotion. Zero about evidence, not even philosophical arguments - just pure emotion. What is neglected in that interview, but he writes about in his book, is that on his hiking tour he saw a frozen waterfall with something like three frozen streams of water, and it was so beautiful it must have meant the holy trinity of christianity was true. :doh:

There's also some stuff about him not feeling he had anything to say to people who were dying, which he met over the course of his research in cancer.

So basically a need for placeholders and some weird emotional experience.

*sigh*


That's similar to an example of something Christopher Hitchins once brought up about a man who walked in the woods, was amazed at the majesty of it and immediately accepted Jesus as his savior even though he had (allegedly) had no such belief before.

As Hitchins pointed out,

Majesty of nature <----> Christianity

What does one have to do with the other? That the man was conditioned by society to perceive a connection?

If he was an ancient Greek, would it have been the majesty of the gods of Olympus?

For that matter,

Majesty of nature <----> any god or religion

Where is there any connection except that we've been taught that there is some sort of connection.
We're holograms projected by a scientist riding on the back of an elephant in a garden imagined by a goose in a snow globe on the mantel of a fireplace imagined in a book in the dreams of a child sleeping in his mother's lap.
User avatar
Moonwatcher
 
Posts: 2018
Age: 66
Male

Print view this post

Previous

Return to Theism

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest