3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition Discussion & Voting

Bring on the nitpicking!

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else below.

Moderators: Calilasseia, ADParker

Vote for your favourite article here:

Poll ended at May 01, 2011 8:50 am

"The Power of Perspective" by Primate
8
29%
"Wow, Man! That's Really Heavy" by hackenslash
7
25%
"RADICAL BEHAVIOURISM AND SOCIETY" by Mr. Samsa
4
14%
"(Not yet) understanding complex systems" by palindnilap
4
14%
"Augmentation: The Availability and Acceptance of Germinal Choice Technologies" by Latimeria
5
18%
 
Total votes : 28

3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition Discussion & Voting

#1  Postby Mazille » Feb 15, 2011 9:39 am


!
GENERAL MODNOTE
ATTENTION! Voting is now up. Every member has three votes at their disposal and the voting period will last for a week. After this the winners will be announced.
Best of luck to the participants. May the best article win. :cheers:

Whip out the textbooks, start up your favourite search engine and get going! The new round is upon us and we want you to type our fingers bloody

This month's topic is: "What area of scientific research do you think will prove to be the most important by the end of this century, and why?"

Take a look at the cutting edge of scientific research and tell us which field looks the most promising to you. AI research, personalized, genome-based medicine, or the neuro-sciences? Give us your speculations, following current facts and rational reasoning.

The competition starts as of now. Participants can post their entries in this "Submissions" thread, while everyone else is cordially invited to comment on the relative merit of the entries in the "Discussion" thread here.


!
GENERAL MODNOTE
Attention! The deadline has been extended!

Submissions can be entered until Tuesday, 29th of March which is when the voting will start. Voting will end on Tuesday, 5th of April.

Articles have to meet all the criteria laid down in the rules here:

The Monthly RatSkep Science Writing Award

We have a lot of professional scientists and very well-versed laymen on the forum and so we decided to make use of those formidable intellectual resources. We challenge you to write an article about a specific topic - which will be revealed later on - and enter it into a competition for "The Monthly RatSkep Science Writing Award"!

Now, to give you an idea of how this competition is going to work:
Every month we will give you the opportunity to take part in this competition. The goal is to write the best article covering a scientific topic of your choice - although with certain restraints. For each round of the competition we will set a general topic (e.g. "Our Solar System", or "The Subatomic World"), from which you can choose any field of interest to write about. After we have announced the general topic of a new round, competitors will have three weeks time to write their articles and enter them in the competition (see below for formal criteria) and after those three weeks users will have another week to vote for the best scientific article.

How is entering the competition and voting going to work?

1. We will have one thread where people can post their articles and enter them in the competition. This thread will be moved from public view after each round of the competition and a new one will be opened for the next round. Only competitors may post there, and the articles will have to be approved by the staff, just like in the Formal Discussion forum.
2. We will have another thread, where users can argue about the merits of each article that entered the competition and where they will be able to vote for their favourite article in the last week of the round via a poll. Every member will have the ability to cast three votes.
3. There will be a third thread, where we collect all the articles that ever entered the competition. This way you will have access to a whole thread full of scientific goodness.
4. After the general topic of a round has been announced, participants will be given three weeks to write and submit their works. Within this time the commentary-thread will be open for relevant discussions, but voting will still be disabled. After these three weeks users will be given one week to submit their votes. At the end of this period the winners will be announced and the submitted articles will enter the "Hall of Fame"-thread. Shortly after that a new round of the competition with an entirely different general topic will start.
5. Each participant may only enter one article per round into the competition.



What are the formal criteria for the articles?

1. Every article you enter into the competition has to be your own original work. Here on RatSkep we do not look kindly on plagiarism. It is, however, allowed to enter the competition with an article you have already posted earlier here on RatSkep, provided it meets the rest of the following criteria.
2. Articles have to be at least 500 words long and mustn't exceed a limit of 3000 words. The maximum number of pictures and graphics is one picture per 500 words of text.
3. Articles have to include an index of their sources, if you used any, and direct quotes have to be credited to the original author. We don't want to impose a specific quotation system on the competitors, but keep it clear, easily readable and stick to one system per article.
4. Articles must cover either the general topic, or an appropriate sub-topic to ensure comparability of your efforts.
5. Of course, the articles will have to be in the limits of the FUA, as usual.



Any article that does not meet all of the above criteria will be disqualified and cannot be entered in the competition.

Why should I enter the competition?

First of all, this is the perfect opportunity to boast with your superior knowledge. Furthermore the winners will get some shiny stuff:

1. The authors of the Top 3 articles will get a nice banner for their signatures, in gold, silver and bronze respectively. The authors of those three articles can keep these banners as long as they want since there are going to be new banners for each new round of the competition.
2. The best entries will also be featured in a prominent spot on our shiny new front-page as soon as LIFE manages to get it up and running.
3. And last, but not least, we might have a few surprises in store for you...




Good luck and have fun! May the best articles win. :cheers: We are looking forward to your contributions.
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#2  Postby Spearthrower » Feb 17, 2011 10:19 am

Query: Should we 'reserve' topics in advance so that others know if someone is planning to focus on the same area?
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
 
Posts: 21866
Age: 41
Male

Country: Thailand
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#3  Postby Mazille » Feb 17, 2011 10:42 am

You can always post what you are planning here. :dunno:
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#4  Postby MedGen » Feb 17, 2011 8:22 pm

IF I have the time, I'll probably do something around stratified and personalized medicine, but that's quite a big if tbh. I think that there's enough diversity on the boards that it's unlikely two people will end doing exactly the same topic anyway.
The nature of reality is not subject to the decrees of human institutions

User avatar
MedGen
 
Posts: 753
Age: 33
Male

Country: UK
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#5  Postby Mr.Samsa » Feb 17, 2011 11:52 pm

Not sure if I'll have time to enter anything, but if I do I'll probably write an essay on research into neural networks.
Image
Mr.Samsa
 
Posts: 11370
Age: 31

Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#6  Postby hackenslash » Feb 18, 2011 12:11 am

Right then. Since nobody else is entering, it should be a snap to finally get my hands on the trophy! Image
User avatar
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 21158
Age: 48
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#7  Postby Mazille » Feb 18, 2011 8:01 am

Get going, you bunch of lazy cunts!
We wouldn't want to let hack win this one, would we now?
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#8  Postby Primate » Feb 18, 2011 8:20 am

I'll think of something to write about. I can't start immediately because I have midterms this week, but I'll start on it when I am through with exams and have some free time!
Primate
 
Posts: 55

Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#9  Postby Spearthrower » Feb 18, 2011 12:45 pm

I've got an idea... but I am a bit concerned about how to frame it as a single area of scientific research! Further, I know that some people won't accept it as scientific but rather it be called engineering... but I consider engineering to be applied physics, and with this topic, applied anatomy too... so I think I can get round all possible objections.

I want to call it 'Robotics' but there's an AI component to it... I am going to need to meditate on it for a while!
I'm not an atheist; I just don't believe in gods :- that which I don't belong to isn't a group!
Religion: Mass Stockholm Syndrome

Learn Stuff. Stuff good. https://www.coursera.org/
User avatar
Spearthrower
 
Posts: 21866
Age: 41
Male

Country: Thailand
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#10  Postby natselrox » Feb 18, 2011 12:50 pm

Either Synthetic Biology or what Samsa said or nothing.
When in perplexity, read on.

"A system that values obedience over curiosity isn’t education and it definitely isn’t science"
User avatar
natselrox
 
Posts: 10037
Age: 106
Male

India (in)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#11  Postby Mazille » Feb 18, 2011 2:28 pm

Spearthrower wrote:I've got an idea... but I am a bit concerned about how to frame it as a single area of scientific research! Further, I know that some people won't accept it as scientific but rather it be called engineering... but I consider engineering to be applied physics, and with this topic, applied anatomy too... so I think I can get round all possible objections.

I want to call it 'Robotics' but there's an AI component to it... I am going to need to meditate on it for a while!

I'd be cool with that. The specific nomenclature is up to you then. :lol:
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#12  Postby Primate » Feb 22, 2011 2:33 am

Doing mine on the importance of evolution and genomics research in dispelling religion. I figured the term "important" can have wide meaning. Generally, I am discussing philosophical importance of this research.
Primate
 
Posts: 55

Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#13  Postby Latimeria » Feb 26, 2011 3:52 am

Ahhhh..... Hadn't really read what topics were "claimed" until now. I've been compiling data on Germline-choice technologies, and I'm releived nobody else has the same focus, although I'm trying to push through despite the feeling that I may have bitten off more than I can chew!

Going to focus on the societal changes of increased acceptance and forecasting some consequences of widespread implementation. I'm currently trying to briefly highlight some of the major ethical arguments for and against made by different camps without giving any personal opinions!
" [This space is for rent to "which ever version of POOF creates the largest cloud of obnoxious smoke following the POOF."[1] "- God
Works Cited:
[1] - theropod. Parsimony of the Miraculous. RatSkep Peanut Gallery Press, 2011.
User avatar
Latimeria
RS Donator
 
Posts: 1083
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#14  Postby palindnilap » Feb 28, 2011 8:08 am

I have got a (from my point of view) stand-out candidate for a science-fiction topic, but it is 100% sure that I won't be able to write anything on it within the deadline. So my idea is up for sale. Hackenslash, what about the cracking of complex systems through extensive simulation, thanks to our ever increasing computing power, and maybe thanks to new epistemological tools for generating knowledge from them ?
palindnilap
RS Donator
 
Posts: 509
Age: 47
Male

Switzerland (ch)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#15  Postby Latimeria » Mar 01, 2011 4:41 am

So, out of curiosity, who else is actually thinking they'll be able to get one done in time?

Sounds like hack and primate are most sure, and then a lot of maybe's due to time constraints?

It's gonna be a crunch, but I fully intend to have something crafted in time...
" [This space is for rent to "which ever version of POOF creates the largest cloud of obnoxious smoke following the POOF."[1] "- God
Works Cited:
[1] - theropod. Parsimony of the Miraculous. RatSkep Peanut Gallery Press, 2011.
User avatar
Latimeria
RS Donator
 
Posts: 1083
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#16  Postby Mazille » Mar 01, 2011 7:04 am

Looks like a lot of people are under severe time constraints. If it helps, I have no problem with extending the deadline by one to four weeks. :think:
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#17  Postby hackenslash » Mar 01, 2011 2:26 pm

Well, I already have an idea, and one that I suspect won't have been picked up by anyone. As it turns out, my time is also severely limited at the moment, so I'd be happy to see the deadline extended.
User avatar
hackenslash
 
Name: The Other Sweary One
Posts: 21158
Age: 48
Male

Country: Republic of Mancunia
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#18  Postby Mazille » Mar 01, 2011 2:40 pm

Anyone else wanna chime in?
- Pam.
- Yes?
- Get off the Pope.
User avatar
Mazille
RS Donator
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 19626
Age: 32
Male

Austria (at)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#19  Postby Latimeria » Mar 01, 2011 5:24 pm

A little extra time would be nice for me as well. I wouldn't mind extending it a bit. If a new submission date were offered that more people find agreeable, I'm all for it. After that we ought to stick to it, though...
" [This space is for rent to "which ever version of POOF creates the largest cloud of obnoxious smoke following the POOF."[1] "- God
Works Cited:
[1] - theropod. Parsimony of the Miraculous. RatSkep Peanut Gallery Press, 2011.
User avatar
Latimeria
RS Donator
 
Posts: 1083
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: 3rd Monthly Science Writing Competition - Discussion

#20  Postby Primate » Mar 02, 2011 3:38 am

I am down for a time extension. I have started my paper, but I am also getting ready for finals, so my progress is slow. More time would be great, and I think I can have a much higher quality paper with a week or more added.
Primate
 
Posts: 55

Print view this post

Next

Return to General Science & Technology

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest