Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
SafeAsMilk wrote:Even then it's only piano music.
This has got to be one of the most ignorant statements regarding music that I've ever seen on this forum. Can we get a dunsapy over here?
Keep It Real wrote:SafeAsMilk wrote:Even then it's only piano music.
This has got to be one of the most ignorant statements regarding music that I've ever seen on this forum. Can we get a dunsapy over here?
Many people will call any old tripe satisfying music; you are not alone. Me? Ignorant of music? That's a good one.
Keep It Real wrote:Some piano music is satisfying and even beautiful and fantastic IMO. I never said otherwise.
Emily Howell isn't that however from what I've heard. Piano music is simple from a technical standpoint compared to much however
- I'd be really impressed if a computer program could layer percussion textures, compress reverb and compose them, design synth patched that fit well etc etc etc. A long way to go to impress me is all I said.
Keep It Real wrote:
I guess you think any old collection of sounds is true music then agihammertheif. Good for you.
Keep It Real wrote:Well, they said people couldn't tell the difference between the bot's track and human composers but I'm guessing they cherry picked the human composers who closely resembled the bot's style. I'd like to hear the whole thing I guess but still an abstract bashy piano composition with no discernible melodic themes is not that impressive as far as music go's. If you think it was as good as Chopin then that's up to you. Even then it's only piano music.
laklak wrote:You kids and your "music". Buncha noise, that's what it is. Hasn't been a decent band since Benny Goodman. Don't even bring up that Sinatra punk.
minininja wrote:lpetrich wrote:I think that that business owner would feel very exploited and oppressed by that. Exploited and oppressed by having to support failures and losers who don't have the decency to build their own business empires, robots and all.
So it's a serious problem.
But, as the economy gets more and more unbalanced, you ultimately have to question whether the concept of ownership as a reason to be deserving of further wealth continues to be valid.
Frase paints two scenarios of the future: One where the profits from all those robots go to a few rich owners, and one where they go to everyone.
If this sounds a bit like communism, that's because it is! Frase prefers the term "fully-automated luxury communism."
Return to General Science & Technology
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest