CdesignProponentsist wrote:Should have been a "Can't decide" option. I grew up with both, and both were monumental.

Same here. I'd go for the "both" option.

cavarka9 wrote:

xtraordinaryevidence wrote:It was so hard to choose. I had to go with the tiebreaker: without physics there would be no biology, without biology there would still be physics, so Sagan wins.

let me tell you aristotle was more of a biologist than physicist, second, sagan and the rest of us are biological agents, so no your reasoning is flawed.

I wasn't talking about the scientific disciplines, and which came first. I was talking about the natural processes, so no my reasoning is not flawed.

I still can't really decide though, but wanted to vote for someone.

xtraordinaryevidence wrote:

cavarka9 wrote:

xtraordinaryevidence wrote:It was so hard to choose. I had to go with the tiebreaker: without physics there would be no biology, without biology there would still be physics, so Sagan wins.

let me tell you aristotle was more of a biologist than physicist, second, sagan and the rest of us are biological agents, so no your reasoning is flawed.

I wasn't talking about the scientific disciplines, and which came first. I was talking about the natural processes, so no my reasoning is not flawed.

I still can't really decide though, but wanted to vote for someone.

if you cant choose, why cant you do this
cant choose: 1

Spearthrower wrote:It is like asking to choose between your 2 fathers in a loving, gay household!

that would be easy, the one who does the house work

Sagan would wear the pants in this relationship.