Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

Anything that doesn't fit anywhere else below.

Moderators: Calilasseia, ADParker

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#361  Postby ProgrammingGodJordan » Apr 22, 2017 8:13 am

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
And ancient astronomy is significantly different from modern astronomy and ancient astronomy isn't science.



It appears you are awaking to the trivial process betwixt the creation of the god redefinition.

Yes, once more, astronomy was a part of old science. (science in antiquity)

So, ancient astronomy was old science...

(Why can my little niece understand this, when you fail to do so?)
[color=Resor):[/color]
[url]http://
[color=GregrammingGodJordan[/url]
User avatar
ProgrammingGodJordan
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Jordan Bennett
Posts: 172

Country: Jamaica
Jamaica (jm)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#362  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Apr 22, 2017 8:15 am

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Also completely immaterial. In both senses of the word.


Illustris is not "immaterial". Illustris is an empirically observable phenomena.

Of an immaterial thing.
The simulation does not actually exist in the physical world, that's why it's called a simulation.


ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:

(b) I did not say a was an actual universe. Ironically, the redefinition purges that our universe was forged by some higher being, but instead, crude universes (SIMULATIONS) such that humans are creators of said constructs...

Again, computers are gods.

Yes, any machine/entity with general human level intelligence (if possible) is god-bound. (As mentioned in the redefinition)

Demonstrating the redefinition is nonsense that's completely detached from it's common usage.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 27132
Age: 28
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#363  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Apr 22, 2017 8:17 am

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
And ancient astronomy is significantly different from modern astronomy and ancient astronomy isn't science.



It appears you are awaking to the trivial process betwixt the creation of the god redefinition.

It appears you cannot raise the level of your subpar, personalised trolling. :roll:

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:Yes, once more, astronomy was a part of old science philosophy. (science philosophy in antiquity)

So, ancient astronomy was old science philosophy...

FIFY.

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:(Why can my little niece understand this, when you fail to do so?)

Why can't you raise your trolling beyond personalised, mindless regurgitation.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 27132
Age: 28
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#364  Postby ProgrammingGodJordan » Apr 22, 2017 8:24 am

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Illustris is not "immaterial". Illustris is an empirically observable phenomenon.

Of an immaterial thing.

The simulation does not actually exist in the physical world, that's why it's called a simulation.[/quote]

That illustris is a simulation, does not erase the instance that it exists.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Demonstrating the redefinition is nonsense that's completely detached from it's common usage.


How does that demonstrate nonsense?
[color=Resor):[/color]
[url]http://
[color=GregrammingGodJordan[/url]
User avatar
ProgrammingGodJordan
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Jordan Bennett
Posts: 172

Country: Jamaica
Jamaica (jm)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#365  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Apr 22, 2017 8:26 am

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
The simulation does not actually exist in the physical world, that's why it's called a simulation.

That illustris is a simulation, does not erase the instance that it exists.

Playing deliberately obtuse is not going to help raise the level of your trolling.

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Demonstrating the redefinition is nonsense that's completely detached from it's common usage.


How does that demonstrate nonsense?

Why can't you raise the level of your trolling?
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 27132
Age: 28
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#366  Postby ProgrammingGodJordan » Apr 22, 2017 8:30 am

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Why can't you raise the level of your trolling?


Your issue may be lack of exercise.

Exercise improves brain health.

Take a look at me:

Image

Perhaps after regular exercise, you may (or may not) come to reduce the magnitude of nonsense that you express.

Give regular exercise a chance. (if you don't already do)
[color=Resor):[/color]
[url]http://
[color=GregrammingGodJordan[/url]
User avatar
ProgrammingGodJordan
Banned Troll
THREAD STARTER
 
Name: Jordan Bennett
Posts: 172

Country: Jamaica
Jamaica (jm)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#367  Postby Thomas Eshuis » Apr 22, 2017 8:34 am

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Why can't you raise the level of your trolling?


Your issue may be lack of exercise.

Exercise improves brain health.

Take a look at me:

Image

Perhaps after regular exercise, you may (or may not) come to reduce the magnitude of nonsense that you express.

Give regular exercise a chance. (if you don't already do)

QED.
"Respect for personal beliefs = "I am going to tell you all what I think of YOU, but don't dare retort and tell what you think of ME because...it's my personal belief". Hmm. A bully's charter and no mistake."
User avatar
Thomas Eshuis
 
Name: Thomas Eshuis
Posts: 27132
Age: 28
Male

Country: Netherlands
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#368  Postby archibald » Apr 22, 2017 10:07 am

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:

Image


You're an elf too! :hugs:
"It seems rather obvious that plants have free will. Don't know why that would be controversial."
(John Platko)
archibald
 
Posts: 9010
Male

Country: Northern Ireland
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#369  Postby theropod » Apr 22, 2017 12:35 pm

void setup()
pinMode(2, OUTPUT); // select forum to post tripe
Serial.begin(9600); // join forum

void loop()
int tripeValue = digitalRead(D2); // boilerplate empty assertion
Serial.println(tripeValue); // output tripe to forum
delay(1); // delay between posting tripe for emotional reaction
17 years off-grid and counting.

Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 6925
Age: 63
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#370  Postby Scot Dutchy » Apr 22, 2017 1:11 pm

:rofl: Nice bit of programming.
Myths in islam Women and islam Musilm opinion polls


"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.” — Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
Scot Dutchy
 
Posts: 37890
Age: 68
Male

Country: Nederland
European Union (eur)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#371  Postby SafeAsMilk » Apr 22, 2017 1:58 pm

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:Oh look, we're back to that old thing that's already been addressed a thousand times. I guess learning from past mistakes isn't a feature of programmers who want to call themselves gods.


Let me reiterate.

And why not? It's all you've ever done.

Your points were nonsense.

So you always claim, but never actually show that this is so. If they were, it would be easy to comprehend the problem and correct it. Instead, you just reiterate your original nonsensical statements and attack positions I don't hold, which is amazing considering even you've conceded how simple and straightforward my points are.

If your points followed with empirical data, while disregarding the god redefinition, I would have long made that publicly known.

I don't need to employ empirical data to point out no empirical data supports your contention, least of all what you've presented.
Yes, a mighty hot dog is our Lord!
User avatar
SafeAsMilk
 
Name: Makes Fails
Posts: 10497
Age: 37
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#372  Postby Fallible » Apr 22, 2017 7:36 pm

Is that supposed to be an example of someone who does exercise? The bloke just looks fat. Fat and petulant.
John Grant wrote:They say 'let go, let go, let go, you must learn to let go'.
If I hear that fucking phrase again, this baby's gonna blow
Into a million itsy bitsy tiny pieces, don't you know,
Just like my favourite scene in Scanners .
User avatar
Fallible
RS Donator
 
Name: Alice Pooper
Posts: 43949
Age: 44
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#373  Postby Arnold Layne » Apr 22, 2017 7:56 pm

Fat and petulant and banned!
I'm a Pixiist
User avatar
Arnold Layne
 
Posts: 2711

Country: France
France (fr)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#374  Postby theropod » Apr 22, 2017 9:22 pm

Aw fuck, I was just getting back into the swing of this. Oh well, a sock will be back soon enough I suspect.

RS
17 years off-grid and counting.

Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 6925
Age: 63
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#375  Postby SafeAsMilk » Apr 22, 2017 11:39 pm

Wherever there is someone mangling a thesaurus, he'll be there...
Yes, a mighty hot dog is our Lord!
User avatar
SafeAsMilk
 
Name: Makes Fails
Posts: 10497
Age: 37
Male

United States (us)
Print view this post

Ads by Google


Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#376  Postby LucidFlight » Apr 23, 2017 12:14 am

Thommo wrote:
LucidFlight wrote:OlivierK, your medial offset comprises optimum reasoning upon the information manifold therein, hence to say. Therefore, align the vector function. I triangulate you.


Felicitous giblets, what a perfectly cromulent digraph. One wonders whether its pentameter would embiggen with a paediatric massage to anticommute its kernel?

How dare you jibe the petulant cormorant? This is invalid toddler logic on the boundary of empirical buffoonery.
OFFICIAL MEMBER: QUANTUM CONSTRUCTOR CONSCIOUSNESS QUALIA KOALA COLLECTIVE.
User avatar
LucidFlight
RS Donator
 
Name: Bob Bobson
Posts: 9062
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#377  Postby theropod » Apr 23, 2017 12:31 am

LucidFlight wrote:
Thommo wrote:
LucidFlight wrote:OlivierK, your medial offset comprises optimum reasoning upon the information manifold therein, hence to say. Therefore, align the vector function. I triangulate you.


Felicitous giblets, what a perfectly cromulent digraph. One wonders whether its pentameter would embiggen with a paediatric massage to anticommute its kernel?

How dare you jibe the petulant cormorant? This is invalid toddler logic on the boundary of empirical buffoonery.


Bigly!



RS
17 years off-grid and counting.

Sleeping in the hen house doesn't make you a chicken.
User avatar
theropod
RS Donator
 
Name: Roger
Posts: 6925
Age: 63
Male

Country: USA
United States (us)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#378  Postby Manticore » Apr 23, 2017 5:43 am

"It is impossible to increase muscle without at the same time decreasing brain."

Edgar Wallace (This might not be word for word - it's been a long time.)
The existence of just one racist is proof that there exists at least one person who could be reasonably classified as sub-human.
User avatar
Manticore
 
Posts: 206

Country: Tanzania
Tanzania (tz)
Print view this post

Re: Why God is scientifically redefinable (an atheist article)

#379  Postby BlackBart » Apr 23, 2017 4:43 pm

What a fucking Herbert :tehe:
You don't crucify people! Not on Good Friday! - Harold Shand
User avatar
BlackBart
 
Posts: 10473
Age: 55
Male

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Previous

Return to General Science & Technology

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest