I've joined Islam

Abrahamic religion, you know, the one with the mosques...

Moderators: theropod, Blip, Spinozasgalt, Durro

Re: I've joined Islam

 
 

Re: I've joined Islam

#81  Postby byofrcs » Jul 30, 2011 6:11 pm

zurina wrote:byfrocs,

Can you make a new Sura with a status that matched with the original Sura? The ones with finesse of Arabic poetry and truly evidence of yours, and can stand on its own merits?

None other Allah can make new Sura; the Quran itself is the completed revelation.


I asked how such new Sura could be judged. The other Muslims refused to answer this question. They just said that it cannot be done, but when asked to help, as per Sura 2:23 they are like cockroaches scuttling away from the light.

They do not want to help. It is my belief that sura can be produced by man and jinn (well actually machines) by using crowd-sourced feedback from Muslims. They just don't want to help though.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#82  Postby z8000783 » Jul 30, 2011 6:24 pm

What is Sura 2:23 all about?

John
I don’t simply believe in miracles - I rely on them
z8000783
 
Name: WTF
Posts: 8322
Age: 58
Male

Greece (gr)

Re: I've joined Islam

#83  Postby byofrcs » Jul 30, 2011 6:51 pm

z8000783 wrote:What is Sura 2:23 all about?

John


It s a challenge that says that if you are in doubt as to which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a sura like it,
and call on your helper, besides Allah, if you are truthful. There are other sura that talk about all men and jinn could not produce a sura like it.

The problem is that trying to nail down Muslims to a process to judge sura e.g. like the ones, http://suralikeit.com/
then you'll find that everyones a critic but there is no authority to judge this.

Most writers have a unique style and there comes a time you can try and emulate the author but if a large number of people have memorised all of the author's text then they will say that it is not right simply because they do not recognise it. This is why I think we can use crowd sourced feedback to help eliminate bias.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#84  Postby z8000783 » Jul 30, 2011 7:04 pm

Ta
I don’t simply believe in miracles - I rely on them
z8000783
 
Name: WTF
Posts: 8322
Age: 58
Male

Greece (gr)

Re: I've joined Islam

#85  Postby Juliuseizure » Jul 30, 2011 7:58 pm

zurina wrote:Why do you joined Islam? And becoming a Shia, on top of that?

Just a curious question; I'm a Sunni and not very well-versed in Shia matters. They're quite different; i.e. in the term of conducting solat. But if you have any question (referring to Muslims life, that is), I'll try to answer some of it.

I think I explain quite well in the thread? The wisdom of fasting in Ramadan was a main reason, the sense of community...solidarity with the bombed of Iraq...lots of reasons.

However I have become convinced Islam isn't possible for me because of, again, lots of reasons, but mainly I oppose a global caliphate which the "no God but Allah" part necessitates. I also don't believe in the hereafter (heaven or hell) so people on an Islamic forum said I wasn't a muslim. You can be a Christian and not believe in Heaven + hell though...weird.

Welcome to the forum! Peaceout.
Juliuseizure
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 865
Age: 30
Male

United Kingdom (uk)

Re: I've joined Islam

#86  Postby zurina » Jul 30, 2011 11:08 pm

byofrcs wrote:

I asked how such new Sura could be judged. The other Muslims refused to answer this question. They just said that it cannot be done, but when asked to help, as per Sura 2:23 they are like cockroaches scuttling away from the light.

They do not want to help. It is my belief that sura can be produced by man and jinn (well actually machines) by using crowd-sourced feedback from Muslims. They just don't want to help though.


Haha, it's obvious that most would probably run away if you were to ask such question :lol: Unfortunately such question should directed someone who have more knowledge than just ilm' tafsir, and such kind doesn't exist conveniently on Net (since they're type to shy away from anything 'modern').

I really wished I could help you, but I don't have the knowledge on it for now. How about if I try to ask my religious teachers about it? Maybe they could shed at least a little bit of light rather than none.


Juliuseizure wrote:
I think I explain quite well in the thread? The wisdom of fasting in Ramadan was a main reason, the sense of community...solidarity with the bombed of Iraq...lots of reasons.

However I have become convinced Islam isn't possible for me because of, again, lots of reasons, but mainly I oppose a global caliphate which the "no God but Allah" part necessitates. I also don't believe in the hereafter (heaven or hell) so people on an Islamic forum said I wasn't a muslim. You can be a Christian and not believe in Heaven + hell though...weird.

Welcome to the forum! Peaceout.


Ahaha.. let's just say after reading the first few posts, I skipped to the last one. My bad :P

Well at least I don't have to explain much about fasting then. The brotherhood in Islam is quite tight-knit; even if a new Muslim from another place come to a different Muslim community, he/she will always be welcomed warmly. The Hajj is a great example about the brotherhood.

:think: On the caliphates, it's mainly comes the lack of better examples. I mean- a caliphate that follows the Koran and as-Sunnah, implementing the sharia law as well as recognizes the rights of non-Muslims as their citizens is a rare thing. Believing in Hereafter is the fifth Pillar of Iman; most Muslims never really questioned about it since they don't have the courage to do it. I can understand their sentiments; but for the ones new to Islam, it is something to be wonder about. Don't worry about others, just take your time to understand on the concept of hereafter. No one is born all-knowingly.

The Ramadan is coming; are you prepared for it?

Thanks for the warm welcome :grin: and hopefully I'm not too late to say: Welcome to Islam, my new brother :cheers: May Allah guide us in our journey to seek better understanding of our faith.
zurina
 
Name: Zurina
Posts: 20
Female

Country: Malaysia
Malaysia (my)

Re: I've joined Islam

#87  Postby z8000783 » Jul 30, 2011 11:19 pm

It's beginning to sound like -
Angels exist because the Quran says so.
Jinn exists because the Quran says so.
Paradise and Hell exist because the Quran says so.

I would imagine there is is not much of a debate to be had with a Muslim about these things so perhaps the real discussion is about the divinity of the Quran and whether it's possible that it was written and assembled by men only.

BTW I would avoid sentence like your last one, although well intentioned they are assumed to be preaching. We know you are a Muslim now and that is fine. Any thoughts you have for us are best kept between you and your God.

John
Last edited by z8000783 on Jul 30, 2011 11:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don’t simply believe in miracles - I rely on them
z8000783
 
Name: WTF
Posts: 8322
Age: 58
Male

Greece (gr)

Re: I've joined Islam

#88  Postby byofrcs » Jul 30, 2011 11:32 pm

zurina wrote:
byofrcs wrote:

I asked how such new Sura could be judged. The other Muslims refused to answer this question. They just said that it cannot be done, but when asked to help, as per Sura 2:23 they are like cockroaches scuttling away from the light.

They do not want to help. It is my belief that sura can be produced by man and jinn (well actually machines) by using crowd-sourced feedback from Muslims. They just don't want to help though.


Haha, it's obvious that most would probably run away if you were to ask such question :lol: Unfortunately such question should directed someone who have more knowledge than just ilm' tafsir, and such kind doesn't exist conveniently on Net (since they're type to shy away from anything 'modern').

I really wished I could help you, but I don't have the knowledge on it for now. How about if I try to ask my religious teachers about it? Maybe they could shed at least a little bit of light rather than none.



If you are in Malaysia then I would avoid doing that so obviously if I was you. It is too risky. Keep it anonymous. Don't use Sura 2:23 as your reference but use another sura (the one about all of man and the djinn). Malaysia is supposed to be secular but Islam is the official religion and it's too tied up with national identity.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#89  Postby zurina » Jul 31, 2011 1:12 am

z8000783 wrote:It's beginning to sound like -
Angels exist because the Quran says so.
Jinn exists because the Quran says so.
Paradise and Hell exist because the Quran says so.

I would imagine there is is not much of a debate to be had with a Muslim about these things so perhaps the real discussion is about the divinity of the Quran and whether it's possible that it was written and assembled by men only.

BTW I would avoid sentence like your last one, although well intentioned they are assumed to be preaching. We know you are a Muslim now and that is fine. Any thoughts you have for us are best kept between you and your God.

John


Well, all Muslim's faith is literally based on the Al-Quran; so its common that most evidences should come form the book itself right :think: To debate whether it is written and assembled by men, and its divinity is not one of my better fields; I pretty much feel regretful now for skipping religious classes during high school :oops: Though its not that I'm running away from the debate, I just need time to do more research about it. Maybe not for now, maybe I'll get on it soon.

Ah sorry for that. I didn't really meant to preach; but wishing good for others is rather a habit for me. Take it as a figurative speech then.

byofrcs wrote:
If you are in Malaysia then I would avoid doing that so obviously if I was you. It is too risky. Keep it anonymous. Don't use Sura 2:23 as your reference but use another sura (the one about all of man and the djinn). Malaysia is supposed to be secular but Islam is the official religion and it's too tied up with national identity.


Well, it's not really much of a concern about it to me. My teachers are always open to me; it's just the matter asking them about it politely and not making a fuss out of it. I'll try to be cautious about it, thanks for the reminder. So far I have yet to deal Islam fanatics, but most of my peers avoid to talk about faith. So it's sort of disheartening when people ask them questions like yours, they would simply ignore it and continue to be in ignorance. I doubt Malaysia is secular; one of the National Principle, or 'Rukun Negara' incited belief in god(s).

But yeah, curiosity kills the cat; I'll try to keep it low for now.
zurina
 
Name: Zurina
Posts: 20
Female

Country: Malaysia
Malaysia (my)

Re: I've joined Islam

#90  Postby z8000783 » Jul 31, 2011 6:51 am

zurina wrote:
z8000783 wrote:It's beginning to sound like -
Angels exist because the Quran says so.
Jinn exists because the Quran says so.
Paradise and Hell exist because the Quran says so.

I would imagine there is is not much of a debate to be had with a Muslim about these things so perhaps the real discussion is about the divinity of the Quran and whether it's possible that it was written and assembled by men only.

BTW I would avoid sentence like your last one, although well intentioned they are assumed to be preaching. We know you are a Muslim now and that is fine. Any thoughts you have for us are best kept between you and your God.

John


Well, all Muslim's faith is literally based on the Al-Quran; so its common that most evidences should come form the book itself right :think: To debate whether it is written and assembled by men, and its divinity is not one of my better fields; I pretty much feel regretful now for skipping religious classes during high school :oops: Though its not that I'm running away from the debate, I just need time to do more research about it. Maybe not for now, maybe I'll get on it soon.

Did you get a chance to see the video I posted about critical thinking and scepticism? I appreciate you may wish to do more research but the fact is you are not thinking of becalming a Muslim, you are one now, so presumably you have already accepted the the Quran is the literal word of God. I am just wondering what the arguments for this are that you currently accept . There must be something that maintains your belief in Allah otherwise you would stop believing this to be true.

zurina wrote:Ah sorry for that. I didn't really meant to preach; but wishing good for others is rather a habit for me. Take it as a figurative speech then.

No problem for me with that but if you have good wishes for people here then they would be more appreciated if they came directly from yourself rather than asking Allah to do it for you.

John
I don’t simply believe in miracles - I rely on them
z8000783
 
Name: WTF
Posts: 8322
Age: 58
Male

Greece (gr)

Re: I've joined Islam

#91  Postby Oeditor » Jul 31, 2011 11:03 am

zurina wrote:Well, all Muslim's faith is literally based on the Al-Quran; so its common that most evidences should come form the book itself right :think: To debate whether it is written and assembled by men, and its divinity is not one of my better fields; I pretty much feel regretful now for skipping religious classes during high school :oops: Though its not that I'm running away from the debate, I just need time to do more research about it. Maybe not for now, maybe I'll get on it soon.
We discussed this quite a bit last year. You might find some interesting links in this thread: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/islam/qur-anic-origins-and-immutability-t3001.html
The very reason food is sealed is to keep information out. - Gary Ablett Snr.
Oeditor
 
Posts: 1390
Male

United Kingdom (uk)

Re: I've joined Islam

#92  Postby byofrcs » Jul 31, 2011 6:07 pm

Just remember that a trap is open and it is inviting. Walk in, trigger it, and clunk - you're dead.

Always poke a stick into an open mind as you would an open trap. If it is safe then walk in. If not then step back.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#93  Postby z8000783 » Jul 31, 2011 6:50 pm

Wise beyond his years this padwan is.

Que-gon John
I don’t simply believe in miracles - I rely on them
z8000783
 
Name: WTF
Posts: 8322
Age: 58
Male

Greece (gr)

Re: I've joined Islam

#94  Postby zurina » Aug 01, 2011 12:30 pm

z8000783 wrote:
Did you get a chance to see the video I posted about critical thinking and scepticism? I appreciate you may wish to do more research but the fact is you are not thinking of becalming a Muslim, you are one now, so presumably you have already accepted the the Quran is the literal word of God. I am just wondering what the arguments for this are that you currently accept . There must be something that maintains your belief in Allah otherwise you would stop believing this to be true.


Ah, I have yet to see the video; busy times. I'll try to squeeze some time to watch it. On the reason why I could take the Quran as the literal word of God.. I can't really explain it in words; but I could tell why I can still maintained my belief while joining RatSkep.

I often questioned myself; if one dies doing goods after living a life of misery while another dies oppressing others yet lived a wealthy life, then where's the justice in Al-Hakem (The Judge; one of Allah's 99 names) and Al-Adl (The Just) if Heaven and Hell never exist? Since everything created (humans, djinns, Hereafter etc. etc.) by Him should have at least a purpose, then if God never exist are we just meaningless beings created out of coincidence? I prefer not to risk my whole life ending up in Hell for eternity if they truly exist as said in the Quran. If not, then at least I could die happily knowing that I've lived my life in virtuous way even it may not be perfect.

I never really intend to preach; instead I'd rather go according to one of my favorite sura:
Say : O Disbeliever! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. To you be your Way, and to me mine.


I'll continue believing what I wish to believe, and I won't bother others who wish to believe their own beliefs; sharing of informations won't be a problem as long as we can be decent to each other.

z8000783 wrote:
No problem for me with that but if you have good wishes for people here then they would be more appreciated if they came directly from yourself rather than asking Allah to do it for you.


Haha, true enough. I'll avoid using them then.

Oeditor wrote:We discussed this quite a bit last year. You might find some interesting links in this thread: http://www.rationalskepticism.org/islam/qur-anic-origins-and-immutability-t3001.html


I'll add this to my reading list; I just need to find a longer time to sit in front of the computer if possible.

byofrcs wrote:Just remember that a trap is open and it is inviting. Walk in, trigger it, and clunk - you're dead.

Always poke a stick into an open mind as you would an open trap. If it is safe then walk in. If not then step back.


Well, I've managed to coax an answer from my religious teacher (and a close friend of mine). It seems that to verify a new Sura (the newly created ones; not the original), you need to examine the level of Arabic poetry in it. If it couldn't match the harmony of the original Suras, then it is considered invalid. More or less, you need to have a mad, inhumane skill in Arabic as well as in grammars, vocabs and obviously pure talent in Arabic poetry. The meaning and contents of the Sura itself must carry truth that can lasted forever and not be denied if there's newer discoveries to be made on it.

My friend said the alphabets and words in Quran itself have their own unique sequence. Some of the examples can be viewed here: http://www.kaheel7.com/eng/index.php/numeric-miracle/61-number-7-in-the-holy-quran

And besides, even if you DO managed to make a Sura that can equally matched with the current ones; it will be immediately rejected anyway since the Quran itself is the completed revelation by God. The source itself naturally protected by writings and the hafizs (people who fully memorize the Quran; derived from the verb 'hafaza' which literally means to protect).

This is pretty new to me; and pretty amazing on top of that. The most that I could do with the Quran is memorizing certain suras and ayat, sometimes with their meanings (and I can't translate correctly without any aid of a translated Quran) :(

Nonetheless, it seems that they're not quite surprised with my answers; they are rather pleased that someone actually asked about it. Or maybe they're used to my personality. Not sure which :whistle:

z8000783 wrote:Wise beyond his years this padwan is.

Que-gon John


And yet I'm still far from experienced and far to be considered knowledgeable. I'm more of 'Epic of Hang Tuah' or 'The Silent Prau' type and a little bit of Mario Puzo's.



Ugh really, I wished I could spend more time to answer on the other thread.
zurina
 
Name: Zurina
Posts: 20
Female

Country: Malaysia
Malaysia (my)

Re: I've joined Islam

#95  Postby byofrcs » Aug 01, 2011 1:08 pm

zurina wrote:....

Well, I've managed to coax an answer from my religious teacher (and a close friend of mine). It seems that to verify a new Sura (the newly created ones; not the original), you need to examine the level of Arabic poetry in it. If it couldn't match the harmony of the original Suras, then it is considered invalid. More or less, you need to have a mad, inhumane skill in Arabic as well as in grammars, vocabs and obviously pure talent in Arabic poetry. The meaning and contents of the Sura itself must carry truth that can lasted forever and not be denied if there's newer discoveries to be made on it.

My friend said the alphabets and words in Quran itself have their own unique sequence. Some of the examples can be viewed here: http://www.kaheel7.com/eng/index.php/numeric-miracle/61-number-7-in-the-holy-quran

And besides, even if you DO managed to make a Sura that can equally matched with the current ones; it will be immediately rejected anyway since the Quran itself is the completed revelation by God. The source itself naturally protected by writings and the hafizs (people who fully memorize the Quran; derived from the verb 'hafaza' which literally means to protect).

.....


I know what is needed ! - they did not answer the question: what is the formal process for Islam to accept new sura ?

As an example: if I have a new mathematics theory then the first thing I do is contact the maths department of a local university to see if what I have has legs to stand up and then if they think it has merit then the country-level mathematics society. If it was physics or other sciences then they all have their path through to acceptance.

There is a process to any new theory being accepted by the community.

Or if I was a runner, or an archery person or a car racer, then equally there are the local, national and international level competitions to see who is good or even the best.

So I don't see that in Islam for this challenge. If any and all contenders would be rejected immediately then there is no challenge. Thus the challenge is fraudulent (or rather the hafizs would be disobeying the sura if they automatically rejected any new sura simply because it was a new sura rather than being like the existing sura.

Also you do not have to have a "mad, inhumane skill in Arabic as well as in grammars, vocabs and obviously pure talent in Arabic poetry" if the new sura were crowd-sourced. The challenge does say about all men and jinn thus it would be better to use many rather than one.

If it has a formulaic structure then this an be encoded and mimicked. Machines can generate nonsense verse but rather than generating billions of nonsense verses you can use existing sura as a template and evolve new sura and then use crowd-sourced feedback to kill or mutate the new sura and then regenerate it.

The many "helpers" I would use is the hafizs themselves. By analysing their brain states using fMRI the we should be able to baseline what the Quran triggers and aim to trigger the same brain patterns. This would help new sura selection.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#96  Postby zurina » Aug 02, 2011 6:55 am

Apparently there's none; so to speak. Nobody even managed to pass the structure part; for every sura the structure is randomize and many researches to study whether there's exist a definite structure are unable to pin out if there is. Even if it is possible to generate a new Sura by using machines and templates from the original, can the new sura would actually contain good meanings and values (since values are subjective)? And we're not talking about only science facts.

I can't really see it's plausible to be done; but if you or someone you know did pin out an actual formulaic structure, maybe it's possible then?
zurina
 
Name: Zurina
Posts: 20
Female

Country: Malaysia
Malaysia (my)

Re: I've joined Islam

#97  Postby Oeditor » Aug 02, 2011 10:51 am

zurina wrote:Apparently there's none; so to speak. Nobody even managed to pass the structure part; for every sura the structure is randomize and many researches to study whether there's exist a definite structure are unable to pin out if there is.
Surely, then, if there's no regular or typical structure to a sura, anything that doesn't copy an existing one will pass the structure test. Anyway, anything that did copy an existing structure would no doubt be struck out as unoriginal. Heads you lose, tails Allah wins, by the sound of it.
The very reason food is sealed is to keep information out. - Gary Ablett Snr.
Oeditor
 
Posts: 1390
Male

United Kingdom (uk)

Re: I've joined Islam

#98  Postby byofrcs » Aug 02, 2011 11:19 am

zurina wrote:Apparently there's none; so to speak. Nobody even managed to pass the structure part; for every sura the structure is randomize and many researches to study whether there's exist a definite structure are unable to pin out if there is. Even if it is possible to generate a new Sura by using machines and templates from the original, can the new sura would actually contain good meanings and values (since values are subjective)? And we're not talking about only science facts.

I can't really see it's plausible to be done; but if you or someone you know did pin out an actual formulaic structure, maybe it's possible then?


I like randomized for a very specific reason - humans are useless at random !. If you say it it randomized then this should be detectable by machine and that would suggest a non-human origin. If it has an underlying structure to what is randomized then this can indicate a human origin. That is a good start and I imagine crypto-maths people would break this down quite fast for the lulz.

By definition any sura that was like the Qur'an would contain good meanings and values simply because the sura was like the Qur'an. It just says to make sura like the Qur'an not have a human judge the content (subjectively): do Muslims judge the Qur'an is good or bad ? I don't think so. If it is like the Qur'an then it is what it is and this defacto good.

But ultimately without a formal process that any new sura would be accepted by Muslims then there is no challenge. I'm not surprised that they don't want to make this easy because I think that deep in their minds they have fear and doubt that someone or something could do this and then the Qur'an become useless.

I don't doubt the problem is hard for the Quran as the same order of complexity exits for e.g. Epic of Gilgamesh or any other poetic writing. I could challenge people to write like any poet and it would be a devilishly hard task to achieve (arguably no one to date has done this successfully with that many poets).

As our machines get more powerful though I think this single-domain problem will fall under the sheer weight of technology and I do not think such a machine needs to pass any Turing test because humans would assist this task (it says we can use men and jinn - which I take to be our Feersum Endjinns)

In hindsight Muhammad was a bit silly to put in such a flaw because it'll be the end of Islam as we know it to be able to generate vast sura like the Qur'an in a robotic fashion on any topic you like. But then all he wanted was to get some Arab tribes united with him in charge.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

Re: I've joined Islam

#99  Postby Oeditor » Aug 02, 2011 2:16 pm

Actually, the whole idea of it being written as poetry stinks a bit. Unless it's the most primitive doggerel, it's bound to be obscurantist to a greater or lesser degree. And in view of the vast amount of effort which has gone into trying to fathom its meaning, down the centuries, greater rather than lesser.
The very reason food is sealed is to keep information out. - Gary Ablett Snr.
Oeditor
 
Posts: 1390
Male

United Kingdom (uk)

Re: I've joined Islam

 
 

Re: I've joined Islam

#100  Postby byofrcs » Aug 02, 2011 3:33 pm

Oeditor wrote:Actually, the whole idea of it being written as poetry stinks a bit. Unless it's the most primitive doggerel, it's bound to be obscurantist to a greater or lesser degree. And in view of the vast amount of effort which has gone into trying to fathom its meaning, down the centuries, greater rather than lesser.


We could run a competition,

On one side are the men (and jinn) who provide sura like the Qur'an and on the other are Muslims who should try and decipher the Linear A script which pre-dates Islam by around 2000 years.
Study philosophy to learn to ask the right questions, study religion to learn to listen to the wrong answers.
It seems you teach a child your religion so they can recognize your enemies.
User avatar
byofrcs
Moderator
 
Name: Lincoln
Posts: 5576
Age: 48
Male

Country: Tax, sleep, identity ?
European Union (eur)

PreviousNext

Topic Tags

Islam

Return to Islam

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest