The Obedient Wife Club

Abrahamic religion, you know, the one with the mosques...

Moderators: theropod, Blip, Spinozasgalt, Durro

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

 
 

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#181  Postby Agrippina » Jul 08, 2011 10:44 am

Beatsong wrote:
Agrippina wrote:I don't think that romantic love enters into these relationships. It seems like it's really a matter of wanting a family and having someone to help with taking care of the kids, and a part time husband. It's different when romantic love is involved. I don't think these men are actually capable of feeling the kind of love that makes a man want an exclusive relationship with a woman. I wonder whether the women feel it or are those feelings suppressed in them from a young age? I'm sure its that feeling of being "in love" that they miss out on which is why they can be so cold about their relationships.


You seem to be presuming that there is some direct, "natural" link between the feeling of love and the conception of an exclusive, monogomous structure in which to enjoy that love. I'm not convinced there is. We value exclusivity and have a presumption of monogamy for many reasons to do with social conditioning, and also often for emotional reasons that have nothing to do with love (insecurity, desire for protection, posessiveness etc.)

Not at all.
All I'm saying is that from what I've read, and my experience with having had Muslim friends, their displays of affection towards their wives in particular seems to me to be more of the attitude that westerners have towards their pets, rather than an affection for the person who shares their lives. The preservation of their own comfort zone appears to me, to be more important than offering small sacrifices to ensure the contentment of their partners. More on this in a moment.

I don't see anything wrong with polygamy per se. I think one problem is that when discussing it, western people tend to compare the messy imperfect reality of how polygamy actually plays out, with the idealised theory of the perfect monogomous marriage. This isn't really a fair or meaningful comparison when you think about it. If you honestly consider the amount of heartbreak, stress, separation, deceit, violence, damage to children etc. that takes place under the umbrella of monogomous marriage in western societies, it would take some pretty hard data to convince me that polygamous ones must be worse.

I'm really the wrong person to discuss this in some ways because I don't believe in "soul mates" and one exclusive "lifelong love." And having been in a few serious relationships in my life, I perhaps understand polygamy more than most women do. I understand that it is totally possible to "love" more than one person and to promise enduring faithfulness to more than one person in your lifetime.
I would add that out of fairness, I see no reason why women shouldn't be equally entitled to have several husbands. Given how much most of the women I know complain about the one they have though, I can't imagine many would want to take up the opportunity. :)

Which brings me back to my first paragraph.
I agree with you. I can say this because I've been there. I've been in relationships that were fun to start with but that soured in time, and I've been in a relationship that has worked for a long time. So yes, I can see that serial relationships could work. It should be the choice of the people involved and not interfered with by governmental authorities.

i think that relationships that last for as long as the people involved are interested in being involved work a lot better than ones where people have promised to stay together for life and then as they go through their life together either grow apart or outgrow the relationship or the other person, or are outgrown by the other person. I also think it's a little ambitious to believe that you will want to be with the person you choose at 20 when you are 80, unless you both make some sort of commitment to maintaining the relationship and work at it. When the relationship is based on "obedience" and subservience, I cannot see that the lesser part of the relationship is going to have a very satisfactory life. Which is why, again from what I've read, older wives tend to treat new younger wives like servants, or younger new wives demand that the older, no longer fertile ones are abandoned. (Sarah demanding that Abraham throw Hagar and Ishmael out.)

I most definitely do not think it is natural to "fall in love" and to stay "in love" throughout a lifetime because the whole business of "falling in love" is merely a hormonal reaction to a physical attraction anyway, and it can happen again and again. I don't think that people who claim to "love" each other after a long life together are "in love" but rather that they've developed, over time, a mutual affection, respect, shared interests, successfully raised offspring and been through dramas with themselves and their offspring and come out without long term damage, rather than "loved" each other through them.
As I've said, I don't believe in "love" as much as I believe in respect, comfort requirements being satisfied, mutual interests, and even financial security as the basis of a successful long term relationship.
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities, has the power to make you commit injustices.
Voltaire
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 22560
Age: 101
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#182  Postby OlivierK » Jul 08, 2011 8:43 pm

Of course, as monogamous de facto couples have long proven, it perfectly possible to have the relationship without the piece of paper. Many people today are in polyamorous relationships of all shapes and sizes, and those that want the security of a contract to regulate inheritance or separation terms can simply write one themselves. They don't get the State-conferred benefits of marriage, such as spousal citizenship rights, but that's not relevant to most. It doesn't work for everyone, but for those that it does, the state can't stand in the way, other than giving tacit sanction to people who want to be judgemental about it.

Agrippina wrote:I think that relationships that last for as long as the people involved are interested in being involved work a lot better than ones where people have promised to stay together for life and then as they go through their life together either grow apart or outgrow the relationship or the other person, or are outgrown by the other person. I also think it's a little ambitious to believe that you will want to be with the person you choose at 20 when you are 80, unless you both make some sort of commitment to maintaining the relationship and work at it. When the relationship is based on "obedience" and subservience, I cannot see that the lesser part of the relationship is going to have a very satisfactory life. Which is why, again from what I've read, older wives tend to treat new younger wives like servants, or younger new wives demand that the older, no longer fertile ones are abandoned. (Sarah demanding that Abraham throw Hagar and Ishmael out.)

I most definitely do not think it is natural to "fall in love" and to stay "in love" throughout a lifetime because the whole business of "falling in love" is merely a hormonal reaction to a physical attraction anyway, and it can happen again and again. I don't think that people who claim to "love" each other after a long life together are "in love" but rather that they've developed, over time, a mutual affection, respect, shared interests, successfully raised offspring and been through dramas with themselves and their offspring and come out without long term damage, rather than "loved" each other through them.
As I've said, I don't believe in "love" as much as I believe in respect, comfort requirements being satisfied, mutual interests, and even financial security as the basis of a successful long term relationship.

Well, I'm a believer in love. Call me sappy, but it gels with my personal experience. I agree that it's unhelpful to stay in a relationship purely out of a sense of obligation, no matter how long it's been, and I certainly agree that successful long relationships are built on companionship, solidarity in adversity, mutual respect and shared challenges and responsibilities. But to me there's something extra there that some people have, and call being "in love"; It's when all of those other things all have an element of joyfulness. Now I'm not 80 yet, but my relationship has seen me from not far past 20 to 45, and I consider myself very much as "in love" today as on day one, or actually, given what we have had together in the interim, more so. I don't really have particular expectations for the future, but if I still feel in love with my wife to the day I die, I wouldn't be in the least surprised.
User avatar
OlivierK
 
Posts: 985
Male

Australia (au)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#183  Postby Agrippina » Jul 09, 2011 6:01 am

I know what you mean about the way you feel. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, and if you want to call it being "in love" that's fine. And you're lucky to feel that way and to have the feeling reciprocated.

Believe me I believe in "love" too. I simply don't look at it with rose-tinted glasses.
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities, has the power to make you commit injustices.
Voltaire
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 22560
Age: 101
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#184  Postby DoctorE » Nov 08, 2011 9:56 am

More on that crazy livestock club
User avatar
DoctorE
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 6854
Age: 52
Male

Iceland (is)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#185  Postby Agrippina » Nov 08, 2011 10:04 am

Bloody crazy randy bastard.

Proverbs 31:

"A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies."

"Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value." Her husband trusts her management of their resources. Her industriousness adds to the family income.

"She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life." This woman does not do right only when it is convenient and profitable. Her actions are not based on how she is treated by others or by what others think. Her character is steady. She is reliable and dependable.

"She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands." This woman enjoys working so much that she plans ahead for what she needs in order to accomplish her responsibilities.

"She is like the merchant ships, bringing her food from afar." The trait not to settle for the mediocre is portrayed by a woman who goes the extra mile for quality items.

"She gets up while it is still dark; she provides food for her family and portions for her servant girls." Though the woman described here has servants to take care of many of the household duties, she sets the pace. She understands that good managers have a responsibility to take care of those under their authority. That is one of her top priorities.

"She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard." Every woman doesn’t have to go into real estate and horticulture — the principle here is that this woman uses her mind. She does not act on a whim, but logically analyzes a situation before making a decision. Her goals are not only short term — she envisions the long-range benefits of her decisions.

"She sets about her work vigorously; her arms are strong for her tasks." We get a picture of a woman who vigorously goes about her duties. She keeps herself healthy and strong by proper health practices — good diet, adequate rest and exercise. Many people depend on her.

"She sees that her trading is profitable, and her lamp does not go out at night." She knows that her merchandise is good and takes pride in doing a good job. Night or day, no one worries that her responsibilities are not taken care of.

"In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers." The example she sets is one of skill and industriousness. Whether this woman would be a computer programmer, a concert pianist, a mother, or all three, she develops her talents and hones her skills through education and diligent application.

"She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy." Although it’s good to donate to needy causes, this means far more than writing a check. This woman shows personal concern. She visits the sick, comforts the lonely and depressed, and delivers food to those in need.

"When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet." Providing clothing for the family is one of her responsibilities. She takes this seriously, and plans ahead. She does not practice crisis management.

"She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple." This woman has high standards and dresses properly for the occasion.

"Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land." This man does not have to spend half his time trying to straighten out problems at home, and his success in the social world comes partly from her support, just as her success comes partly from his support. The original woman of Proverbs 31 couldn’t phone her husband for his opinion on matters. She made many of the day-to-day decisions about their property and goods. He trusted her to manage the estate efficiently.

"She makes linen garments and sells them, and supplies the merchants with sashes." This woman runs a business from her home. Her efforts and industry add to the family income.

"Strength and honor are her clothing; she shall rejoice in time to come" (NKJV). Not only does this woman benefit each day from her wise and diligent actions, long-term lifetime benefits and rewards lie in store for her.

"She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue." This woman is well read and has the facts. She knows what she is talking about. Whether about her job, her personal values or her opinion on world events, she is able to express herself intelligently, tactfully and diplomatically. People come to her for good advice.

"She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness." She is an organized, energetic person who carries out her responsibilities.

"Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her." This woman is not a doormat, slavishly trying to appease and please her family, no matter how unreasonable their demands. She is honored in her home. Here we gain an insight into the character of her husband as well. He teaches their children to respect her and the virtues she personifies.

"Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all." High praise for this extraordinary woman — a role model for women of all time.

"Charm is deceptive and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised." Here is the key to this woman’s effectiveness. Her priorities are determined by God’s will, not her own. She is concerned about what God thinks, rather than with what other people think. Physical beauty and clever conversation are admirable qualities. But if a woman’s beauty and charm are the extent of her virtues, what happens when time and the trials of life take their toll? This woman does not depend on beauty and charm for her success. She recognizes her need for God.

"Give her the reward she has earned, and let her works bring her praise at the city gate." This woman is actively doing, not merely talking. She does not boast about her plans for the future or her successes of the past. They are obvious.
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities, has the power to make you commit injustices.
Voltaire
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 22560
Age: 101
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#186  Postby cherries » Nov 09, 2011 4:30 am

notice the mans role in all this .. :lol: :lol:
"I talk to God but the sky is empty."

Sylvia Plath

A theists for Conservation
User avatar
cherries
 
Posts: 6365
Age: 48
Female

Country: deutschelande
Germany (de)

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

 
 

Re: The Obedient Wife Club

#187  Postby Agrippina » Nov 09, 2011 4:57 am

As long as women are submissive, religions like this, and fundamentalist Christianity, will continue to grow.

It's difficult to convince women who want to be condescended to, because they're just too lazy to change their attitudes, and who raise their daughters to be submissive and their sons to be protective bullies, to change their attitude. Women who want to be treated like they're special, having men "stand up for them," show good manners towards them because they are women and not because they just have good manners etc. perpetuate this submissiveness. And they don't see it as being disrespectful to them, they actually see it as "respect."

I don't know how to change the attitude. Personally, I think that there are so many other aspects of our cultures that encourage it: and even open-minded people disagree with me on this. We continue to allow girls to participate in beauty contests, hiding the truth of them being about beauty, behind a pretense that they raise money for charity, for example. From people who I respect as skeptics and as being open-minded, I get comments that we should exploit our talents and if being beautiful is the only talent we have, we should exploit it. I don't agree, beauty is nothing, it's just an accident of nature, or merely a procreation asset. We exploit it and encourage girls to aspire to beauty titles by continuing to allow them. Then there are other industries, cosmetics, fashion, and yes I know they provide employment and are beneficial to struggling economies and not everyone can be a scholar etc etc etc, but when we dress our daughters in fashionable clothes, or wear them ourselves, we're lazily doing more to encourage them to buy into the idea that they have to be attractive in order to catch a mate, rather than self-actualising people in their own right.

Not that there's anything wrong with "catching" a mate. I'm not saying that the species should die out (although for the sake of the planet would that be a terrible idea?) I am saying that all the beauty industry does, is to validate women as objects of beauty, vapid vessels for men's pleasure, rather than as equal partners in society.

Within our societies, appearance should be the least important aspect of how we view people. We place far too much emphasis on whether someone is wearing a matching outfit or has tattoos or a beard, or facial hair, bushy eyebrows, than on the content of their heads.

When we can raise our daughters to care more about their education than about their hair or what they wear to school, we will have come a long way towards breaking the mindset that makes them want to submit to men. And then it will be easy enough to point out to them how religion forces submission.
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities, has the power to make you commit injustices.
Voltaire
User avatar
Agrippina
 
Posts: 22560
Age: 101
Female

Country: South Africa
South Africa (za)

Previous

Topic Tags

Islam, Malaysia

Return to Islam

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest