Moderators: Spinozasgalt, reddix









Animavore wrote:Who is this 'Handel' that Andrew is for anyway?

Animavore wrote:Who is this 'Handel' that Andrew is for anyway?





Animavore wrote:I just recently noticed recently a lot of people don't put an 'an' before 'h' words where the 'h' is silent ('an hour' 'an heir' compared to 'a hollow' 'a hero'). Is this not practised every where?
Evolving wrote:Blip, intrepid pilot of light aircraft and wrangler with alligators.

thaesofereode wrote:While we're on the subject of "h" words, I'm noticing with increasing frequency the phrase "might of," when people actually mean to say "might have" -- as in, "I might have left the door open." Is this also a result of unpronounced letters "h" in common usage?

The_Piper wrote:thaesofereode wrote:While we're on the subject of "h" words, I'm noticing with increasing frequency the phrase "might of," when people actually mean to say "might have" -- as in, "I might have left the door open." Is this also a result of unpronounced letters "h" in common usage?
![]()
That one's grammatically wrong. They are spelling out "might've, could've, etc" the way it sounds.
I used to be a grammer nazi until Mozilla started using an automatic spell-checker.
thaesofereode wrote:The_Piper wrote:thaesofereode wrote:While we're on the subject of "h" words, I'm noticing with increasing frequency the phrase "might of," when people actually mean to say "might have" -- as in, "I might have left the door open." Is this also a result of unpronounced letters "h" in common usage?
![]()
That one's grammatically wrong. They are spelling out "might've, could've, etc" the way it sounds.
I used to be a grammer nazi until Mozilla started using an automatic spell-checker.
Yah. It's a bit more of a grammatical thing. But the use of "a" or "an" before an "h" word is a grammatical question, too, yes? And these questions have to do with pronunciation having an effect on how they're written out.
In any case, banish the thought — or even the slightest whiff — of my being a "grammar nazi." I've been roundly and thoroughly criticized (or "criticised" for our esteemed UK denizens) for bringing up points of grammar on this forum, so I've sworn it off . . . at least for now.

thaesofereode wrote:The_Piper wrote:thaesofereode wrote:While we're on the subject of "h" words, I'm noticing with increasing frequency the phrase "might of," when people actually mean to say "might have" -- as in, "I might have left the door open." Is this also a result of unpronounced letters "h" in common usage?
![]()
That one's grammatically wrong. They are spelling out "might've, could've, etc" the way it sounds.
I used to be a grammer nazi until Mozilla started using an automatic spell-checker.
Yah. It's a bit more of a grammatical thing. But the use of "a" or "an" before an "h" word is a grammatical question, too, yes? And these questions have to do with pronunciation having an effect on how they're written out.
In any case, banish the thought — or even the slightest whiff — of my being a "grammar nazi." I've been roundly and thoroughly criticized (or "criticised" for our esteemed UK denizens) for bringing up points of grammar on this forum, so I've sworn it off . . . at least for now.




Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest