Hello, that was easy.

**#61** · **#61** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 10:13 am

It just reminded me of you, so my ickle brain thought scherado most likely a fem too.

**#62** · **#62** by **Fallible** » Oct 13, 2018 10:15 am

**#63** · **#63** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 6:36 pm

Blackadder wrote:...
But I'm a glass half-full kinda guy, so I look for encouraging signs.

Have you ever wondered about the possibility of having a half full/empty glass?

I'll give you a chance to reply before I tell you what I mean. I don't mean the statistical probability, I mean the actuality of filling a glass up to half full/empty.

Give it your best shot. I'll wait.

**#64** · **#64** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 6:39 pm

newolder wrote:...
No, you haven't "fixed it". The misattribution occurred first in post #41, here.

I don't know if the "post be can edited" window remains open for post #41. Heigh ho.

No, I'm not able to edit that post any longer. Sorry.

**#65** · **#65** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 6:45 pm

Fallible wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:Ah, seen, maybe not a lady then...I'm getting girly vibes though still....dunno why...

I don't know why either. the o on the end of the name is masculine. I was also going to offer something sexist about the content of his posts, but I'm not feeling naughty enough today, unlike you.

I ask you outright--and will inform you in advance that it is a trick question--how does my genitalia change the value of the content of my posts?

I await your answer.

**#66** · **#66** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 6:48 pm

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/new-m ... l#p2656863

Keep It Real wrote:Ah, seen, maybe not a lady then...I'm getting girly vibes though still....dunno why...

I'll ask you, too, outright--and will inform you in advance that it is a trick question--how does my genitalia change the value of the content of my posts?

I await your answer.

**#67** · **#67** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 6:56 pm

It doesn't really, certainly not on any topic thus far discussed with you that I'm aware of, and I never said it did.

**#68** · **#68** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 9:44 pm

Keep It Real wrote:It doesn't really, certainly not on any topic thus far discussed with you that I'm aware of, and I never said it did.

You get 9.5 out 10 on the Equivocation Meter.

**#69** · **#69** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 9:48 pm

**#70** · **#70** by **scherado** » Oct 13, 2018 10:24 pm

scherado wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:It doesn't really, certainly not on any topic thus far discussed with you that I'm aware of, and I never said it did.

You get 9.5 out 10 on the Equivocation Meter.

Keep It Real wrote:gorilla4.jpg

9.5 out of 10 means your response was very close to worthless.

**#71** · **#71** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 10:26 pm

Don't they look oh so human though?

**#72** · **#72** by **Fallible** » Oct 13, 2018 10:30 pm

scherado wrote:
Fallible wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:Ah, seen, maybe not a lady then...I'm getting girly vibes though still....dunno why...

I don't know why either. the o on the end of the name is masculine. I was also going to offer something sexist about the content of his posts, but I'm not feeling naughty enough today, unlike you.

I ask you outright--and will inform you in advance that it is a trick question--how does my genitalia change the value of the content of my posts?

I await your answer.

Await all you like. You're asking the wrong person. One would have thought someone who assumes the savant role so readily wouldn't make silly mistakes. Shove your posturing up your arse.

**#73** · **#73** by **Fallible** » Oct 13, 2018 10:31 pm

scherado wrote:
scherado wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:It doesn't really, certainly not on any topic thus far discussed with you that I'm aware of, and I never said it did.

You get 9.5 out 10 on the Equivocation Meter.

Keep It Real wrote:gorilla4.jpg

9.5 out of 10 means your response was very close to worthless.

Kindly fuck off.

**#74** · **#74** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 10:37 pm

Largely off topic, but I chose that pic because in the documentary I watched last night I was touched by a pic of Hillary Clinton holding a newborn whilst researching universal healthcare in Estonia, which she hoped to instigate in the states. If only she hadn't been viewed as being an "establishment figure" we might not be in the sorry tangle with Trump that we are. :sigh:

Edits - tried to quote but clicked edit:

**#75** · **#75** by **laklak** » Oct 13, 2018 10:55 pm

She needs to know the fat content to decide how to cook it.

**#76** · **#76** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 11:03 pm

I think she's trying to give them warmth, not cook them....you know, like medium defrost on a microwave :nono:

**#77** · **#77** by **Ironclad** » Oct 13, 2018 11:08 pm

Keep It Real wrote:Strange...people usually have to get to know me a bit before they start ignoring me

Your reputation has traveled well lol

**#78** · **#78** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 13, 2018 11:13 pm

We don't talk about the "chewing down" APA incident....back on (the RIGHT) meds now I'm almost entirely civil and reasonable Iron.

**#79** · **#79** by **laklak** » Oct 13, 2018 11:46 pm

Keep It Real wrote:I think she's trying to give them warmth, not cook them....you know, like medium defrost on a microwave

Dear God, what philistine would ruin fresh baby in a microwave?? You can't crisp the skin, might as well buy it in a bloody can.

**#80** · **#80** by **Keep It Real** » Oct 14, 2018 12:07 am

aban57 wrote:
Keep It Real wrote:I cook bacon for sarnies on a baking tray in the oven seems less hassle that way...microwaving bacon works too

Microwaving ? You're an animal...

Keep It Real wrote:

Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Ads by Google

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Ads by Google

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Ads by Google

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Re: Hello, that was easy.

Who is online