Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

Corporate fascism under the Tories

For discussion of politics, and what's going on in the world today.

Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron

Re: Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

#21  Postby I'm With Stupid » Oct 18, 2018 9:20 am

Least surprising court result since they gay cake one last week.

Now onto the allegations that the original sentencing judge has family members working in the oil and gas industry and explicitly campaigning for fracking. How is he not in trouble for not declaring that?
Image
User avatar
I'm With Stupid
 
Posts: 9654
Age: 39
Male

Country: Malaysia
Jolly Roger (arr)
Print view this post

Re: Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

#22  Postby I'm With Stupid » Oct 18, 2018 9:23 am

willhud9 wrote:
Thommo wrote:
I'm With Stupid wrote:Any protest that starts to threaten that is quickly quashed (see Occupy Wall Street or the pipeline protests).


How quickly was occupy wall street quashed?


or for that matter the pipeline protest? :dunno:

Perhaps quashed was the wrong word. But 'cracked down on with disproportionate force' would definitely be appropriate.
Image
User avatar
I'm With Stupid
 
Posts: 9654
Age: 39
Male

Country: Malaysia
Jolly Roger (arr)
Print view this post

Re: Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

#23  Postby Calilasseia » Oct 18, 2018 11:27 am

There's also the little matter of the presiding judge in the original case having ties to the fracking industry. More on this here.

The judge’s parents John and Linda, 86 and 84, are ­directors of J.C. Altham & Sons.

His sister Jane, 54, is managing director of the firm, which supplies ships’ stores, including food, tools, rigging equipment and clothes. The firm’s website says it is a “specialist supplier to offshore gas and oil platforms”.

Three oil rigs in the East Irish Sea – near Altham’s base at Heysham, Lancs – belong to British Gas owner Centrica, which has ploughed tens of millions of pounds into fracking firm Cuadrilla.


The sister in question mentioned above, also engaged in pro-fracking lobbying. Again from that news article:

In 2015 Jane’s name and that of her firm appeared on an open letter backed by 119 businesses.

It urged Lancashire County Council to permit fracking and create a “£33billion supply chain”.

The campaign was led by North West Energy Task Force, which allegedly received financial support from Cuadrilla and Centrica. The NWETF was later rebranded as lobbying group ­Lancashire For Shale.


With respect to judicial conduct, the article reveals this:

The judicial code of conduct states a judge’s impartiality may be questioned if family members are “politically active” or have “financial interest” in the outcome of a case.


Clear case of conflict of interest. This verdict should have been struck down on those grounds alone.

[Edited to include the lobbying information]
Signature temporarily on hold until I can find a reliable image host ...
User avatar
Calilasseia
RS Donator
 
Posts: 22629
Age: 62
Male

Country: England
United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

#24  Postby Teague » Oct 18, 2018 11:38 am

Funnily Enough, that Richard guy was just on James O'Brien on LBC - he got 15 months (public nuisance) for sitting on a lorry.

15 months for public nuisance....
User avatar
Teague
 
Posts: 10072

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Re: Blackpool activists jailed for anti-fracking protest

#25  Postby Teague » Oct 18, 2018 11:39 am

Calilasseia wrote:There's also the little matter of the presiding judge in the original case having ties to the fracking industry. More on this here.

The judge’s parents John and Linda, 86 and 84, are ­directors of J.C. Altham & Sons.

His sister Jane, 54, is managing director of the firm, which supplies ships’ stores, including food, tools, rigging equipment and clothes. The firm’s website says it is a “specialist supplier to offshore gas and oil platforms”.

Three oil rigs in the East Irish Sea – near Altham’s base at Heysham, Lancs – belong to British Gas owner Centrica, which has ploughed tens of millions of pounds into fracking firm Cuadrilla.


The sister in question mentioned above, also engaged in pro-fracking lobbying. Again from that news article:

In 2015 Jane’s name and that of her firm appeared on an open letter backed by 119 businesses.

It urged Lancashire County Council to permit fracking and create a “£33billion supply chain”.

The campaign was led by North West Energy Task Force, which allegedly received financial support from Cuadrilla and Centrica. The NWETF was later rebranded as lobbying group ­Lancashire For Shale.


With respect to judicial conduct, the article reveals this:

The judicial code of conduct states a judge’s impartiality may be questioned if family members are “politically active” or have “financial interest” in the outcome of a case.


Clear case of conflict of interest. This verdict should have been struck down on those grounds alone.

[Edited to include the lobbying information]


How did a judge who has ties to the industry become the judge for this case?
User avatar
Teague
 
Posts: 10072

United Kingdom (uk)
Print view this post

Previous

Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest