Moderators: Darkchilde, Mazille, Durro, Weaver, Fallible, HughMcB, byofrcs
Grace wrote:Andy, as an American, I never heard any American or American media call Nelson Mandela a terrorist. Where did you get that idea?

FACT-MAN-2 wrote:Mononoke wrote:8% economic growth is very impressive. I guess the chinese & indian promised to buy a lot of their oil. It looks like even our government will give these sanctions the middle finger and continue with our normal purchases
The Chinese entered into long-term oil supply contracts with Iran several years ago. And yes, it's very good business, it helps drive that 8 per cent economic growth you mention, which beats the hell out of anything happening in the West.

andyx1205 wrote:FACT-MAN-2 wrote:Mononoke wrote:8% economic growth is very impressive. I guess the chinese & indian promised to buy a lot of their oil. It looks like even our government will give these sanctions the middle finger and continue with our normal purchases
The Chinese entered into long-term oil supply contracts with Iran several years ago. And yes, it's very good business, it helps drive that 8 per cent economic growth you mention, which beats the hell out of anything happening in the West.
Indeed and India buys a lot of oil as well, and considering it's got a large population...India will find ways to work around any laws to buy Iranian oil.
If you think about it, sidelining Iran actually negatively affects China, Russia, and India, three great powers. I'd factor this into the equation when it comes to America's interest in antagonizing Iran. It makes sense.





Varangian wrote:Sa, a fundamentalist, undemocratic regime with local power aspirations is perfectly justified to develop nukes, and the rest of the world should just look on? Not that I think that an invasion is feasible, or even on the map for the US.

Mononoke wrote:Varangian wrote:Sa, a fundamentalist, undemocratic regime with local power aspirations is perfectly justified to develop nukes, and the rest of the world should just look on? Not that I think that an invasion is feasible, or even on the map for the US.
Iran isn't some banana republic run by a tin pot dictator. If we can expect uncle sam not to go trigger crazy with his nukes, then we can certainly expect the same from Iran.

Varangian wrote:Sa, a fundamentalist, undemocratic regime with local power aspirations is perfectly justified to develop nukes, and the rest of the world should just look on? Not that I think that an invasion is feasible, or even on the map for the US.


quixotecoyote wrote:Mononoke wrote:Varangian wrote:Sa, a fundamentalist, undemocratic regime with local power aspirations is perfectly justified to develop nukes, and the rest of the world should just look on? Not that I think that an invasion is feasible, or even on the map for the US.
Iran isn't some banana republic run by a tin pot dictator. If we can expect uncle sam not to go trigger crazy with his nukes, then we can certainly expect the same from Iran.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't expect Iran to go crazy with it's nukes.
I expect it to use it's nukes as cover under which to do higher levels of the same crap it's doing now. I'd prefer a less influential Iran to a more influential Iran (because it's run by fucking nutballs who make Bush look as left as Chomsky in comparison), and nukes make it much more influential.

Return to News, Politics & Current Affairs
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest