"The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Spearthrower · **#81** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 2:08 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Except that it's not a "10second out of context snippet". The full video shows that it's very much in context.
In the abbreviated version she's celebrating the transformation that's already underway. The longer version has her stating the desire to make the transformation happen.

I'll rely on other people who've watched the video - because I don't really feel the need to partake in 'bloke down the pub says' as being a worthwhile source. I am fairly confident based on the responses though that the video and person in the video doesn't mean 'transform' the white people away, which is supposed to be your point isn't it?

Mike_L · **#82** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 2:28 pm

Spearthrower wrote:When exactly was it that you flounced off Mike_L? I can't recall. Was the flounce dramatic? I sadly can't recall that either. I do recall you flouncing but few other details. Did you give a de-flounce speech on your return? Did you post anywhere about the thought processes that caused you first to flounce then to return back to the place you'd previously flounced from?

It was a rather low-key flouncing... right here.
The return was even more low-key. I just started posting again... can't even remember in which thread it was.
Rachel Bronwyn said something to the effect of "I thought you were supposed to be going for good" (can't remember her exact words), tuco said something to the effect of, "Welcome back", and that was it.

Spearthrower wrote:
Mike_L wrote:
Except that it's not a "10second out of context snippet". The full video shows that it's very much in context.
In the abbreviated version she's celebrating the transformation that's already underway. The longer version has her stating the desire to make the transformation happen.

I'll rely on other people who've watched the video...

The Liberal Collective in action. :clap:

Spearthrower · **#83** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 2:45 pm

Mike_L wrote:The Liberal Collective in action.

Leonard beats his tribalistic drum to pacify the cognitive bias.

Everyone not like me is part of X group. I mean, this is lowest common denominator shit Mikey - you should head off to Youtube where you'll find this kind of prejudice touting is perceived as astoundingly perceptive commentary.

Here, no.

Spearthrower · **#84** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 2:49 pm

Spearthrower wrote:Imagine finding yourself espousing a position in which liberty, consent, and legal equality need to be 'cured'.

Mike_L · **#85** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 2:53 pm

Cito di Pense wrote:
Mike_L wrote:
The first first step is ensure that "injustice" is defined by those seeking to effect the transformation.

Whereas you're stuck in fantasyland trying to prevent or reverse change, when change is the expected (natural) course of things. Furthermore, you seem obsessed mainly with skin color, which is getting blended. If you understand anything about mixing, it's that it takes a certain amount of work to prevent it, since mixing is spontaneous.

Yes, always has been spontaneous... but at a low level...

Even in multicultural nations interracial relationships and marriages are quite rare...

-- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470491301100410

Currently, fewer than 5% of white Americans wed outside their own race; indeed, less than 46% of white Americans are willing to date an individual of any other race.

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_sexual_preference

In a study of internet dating...

Each group significantly prefers to date intra-racially.

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_sexual_preference

The globalists / multiculturalists / commies will try to accelerate it, though.

Mike_L · **#86** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 2:57 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:Imagine finding yourself espousing a position in which liberty, consent, and legal equality need to be 'cured'.

By quoting yourself do you become the loudest buzz in the hive mind?

Spearthrower · **#87** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:05 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:Imagine finding yourself espousing a position in which liberty, consent, and legal equality need to be 'cured'.

By quoting yourself do you become the loudest buzz in the hive mind?

Back to vapid trolling Mikey boy?

Spearthrower · **#88** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:08 pm

Look at all the 'other' groups Mike_L's listing.

The commies, the globalists, the liberals, the muticulturalists...

It's almost like the only way Mike_L can define his own position is by his opposition to the other, so anything he doesn't agree with or anyone who doesn't agree with him must automatically be included in one of those groups.

But of course, we DO know a historical political position explicitly against communists, liberals and multiculturalists... and that turned out so well!

Where does the radicalization end? It starts with anti-SJW, runs through Jordan Peterson, takes a holiday with Tucker Carlson, then finds itself a white nationalist armed with pseudoscientific ignorant claims, seeing enemies everywhere and espousing a position that demands a 'cure' for liberty, consent, and legal equality.

That's some heady shit. I wonder if you need a badge and boots to be a part of that club.

Mike_L · **#89** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 3:08 pm

Spearthrower wrote:
Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:Imagine finding yourself espousing a position in which liberty, consent, and legal equality need to be 'cured'.

By quoting yourself do you become the loudest buzz in the hive mind?

Back to vapid trolling Mikey boy?

C'mon, Shaftwaver! You've got to do better than just using the diminutive form of 'Mike'.

Mike_L · **#90** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 3:11 pm

Spearthrower wrote:But of course, we DO know a historical political position explicitly against communists, liberals and multiculturalists... and that turned out well!

Conservatives? :ask:

Spearthrower · **#91** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:12 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:
Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:

By quoting yourself do you become the loudest buzz in the hive mind?

Back to vapid trolling Mikey boy?

C'mon, Shaftwaver! You've got to do better than just using the diminutive form of 'Mike'.

Did you mean 'yes' Mikey?

Spearthrower · **#92** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:12 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:But of course, we DO know a historical political position explicitly against communists, liberals and multiculturalists... and that turned out well!

Conservatives?

Is that what you think you are? :lol:

That's what Trump supporters think they are too. It's even funnier because you just seem far too intelligent for this self-deceit.

Mike_L · **#93** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 3:14 pm

Is that what you think you are?

Only when I'm feeling liberal.

Spearthrower · **#94** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:18 pm

The globalists / multiculturalists / commies will try to accelerate it, though.

Such a cute idea. Will they be giving handjobs too to speed along the process?

Incidentally, why is it only 'whites' that disappear when it comes to admixture, Leonard? Aren't the other 'races' also disappearing at exactly the same rate?

Or is there something special - maybe even superlative - about whiteness? Only you didn't say.

Spearthrower · **#95** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:23 pm

Also, let's run along with the pseudoscientific racialist ideology here... if diversity is not desirable because 'it makes trouble' (or whatever lame duck argument that ignores the entirety of human history) then ultimately admixture is desirable - as much admixture as possible because then we'd all be as homogeneous as attainable.

Oh wait, sorry - it's silly of me to expect any of this irrational flatulence to actually be thought through. I must remember to emote more at things rather than consider them with reason.

Spearthrower · **#96** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:25 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Is that what you think you are?

Only when I'm feeling liberal.

Hmmm, let's see if memory serves. Last time, your vapid trolling started about 10 days prior to your flounce, didn't it? I mean, the point where you gave up trying to defend any of your patently ignorant claims and just started tossing labels around.

Mike_L · **#97** by **Mike_L** » Jan 08, 2021 3:27 pm

Spearthrower wrote:...ultimately admixture is desirable - as much admixture as possible because then we'd all be as homogeneous as attainable.

Like a big Collective. Woohoo!

Spearthrower · **#98** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:35 pm

Mike_L wrote:
Spearthrower wrote:...ultimately admixture is desirable - as much admixture as possible because then we'd all be as homogeneous as attainable.

Like a big Collective. Woohoo!

Right, so can you consider whether that would assuage your pseudoscientific ideologically motivated fears? There'd be no diversity which is what causes all the problems, right, so if you took away diversity, there'd be no problems, right, and then you could safely leave your little information bubble without fear of johnny foreigner doing unspeakable things to you because there'd be no heritable visible distinctions. Right?

Isn't that what you want as an ethno-nationalist? For everyone around you to be just like you?

Spearthrower · **#99** by **Spearthrower** » Jan 08, 2021 3:37 pm

Seabass wrote:
So you've gone full "white genocide"/"great replacement", eh Mike?

I'm starting to wonder whether this is one of Mike_L's more moderate beliefs.

The_Piper · **#100** by **The_Piper** » Jan 08, 2021 3:37 pm

I read one study (I can't remember where or when) that suggested pale skin is a very recent adaptation, as in less than 10,000 years old. If true, that's in the range of 5% of humanities existence. Red/orange hair and possibly, blue eyes preceded it. I wonder about freckles though. I believe they're passed on through genes.
Maybe we should consider people with freckles as another separate race, and not allow them to infiltrate our non-freckled society. I have 4 or 5 freckles, but if I wear long sleeves you can't see them. It's already too late!

"The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Ads by Google

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Ads by Google

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Ads by Google

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Re: "The always-excellent Tucker Carlson"

Who is online