by crank wrote:
Wow, here you decided to try again instead of cowardly slinking away like you did in The Clinton Victory thread. The stupidity of your post was too obvious to even try responding to the shredding? OK, lets take a look at what you've managed to vomit up here.
It's almost all non-responsive and irrelevant, with little to no content I can even respond to. You first give an example of something I know little about and haven't posted anything on that subject. It appears to be some of the whining about accusations of Bills womanizing and whether Hillary has caused damage to women in her defense of Bill. Don't know, this isn't something I've paid attention to. I do know that such talk has been percolating around for a couple of decades now, and not just from the RWingers, unless you call Hitchens a RWinger?
The rest is too incoherent, I can't understand what the hell you're talking about. You're supposed to be defending your statement sort of equating Alex Jones with anti-Hillary people. I can't tell if you're saying that a lot of the issues the tea party and jones have in common with Bernie supporters are somehow extreme? If that's the case, you're too clueless about what's happening in this country. But then you tried to make the case that income inequality wasn't really going on, after I demonstrated how full of shit you were, you again slinked away and didn't respond. And the same goes for cops murdering blacks, that isn't going on either in your reality.
It never ceases to amaze how delusional you people are, stooping to the same pathetic tactics the creationists employ as SOP in futile attempts to make the establishment politics look acceptable. It's clear, no amount of reasoned argument backed up with documented facts will help the lot of you to wake the fuck up.
Crank's name calling and crowing about shredding other peoples' posts is getting a bit old, and more than a bit pathetic. And that he nor Teague addressed the main points of my post is glaring. So, just in case they have trouble with reading comprehension I'll put my points plainly:
a) The far right and the far left get far to emotional over what they consider political opponents. Almost literally frothing at the mouth while spewing personal attacks.
b) The far left sees nothing wrong in repeating lies originating from the far right if it suits their purpose of demonizing who they consider their enemy.
c) The far left at this time as represented by rabid Bernie supporters have no valid criticisms of left leaning centrists like Hillary so they rely almost entirely on character assassination, demonizing, and conspiracy theories to defend their hero.
d) Though loud and demanding neither the far right or the far left has much of any relevance to what is actually going on in the US today, or what the outcome of the election will be.
e) No one other than vocal yet unimportant minorities on the extreme lunatic fringes of the right and left wants, or sees a need for, a revolution towards either direction.
f) Those on the extreme far right will be pitching fits when they don't get what they want and those on the far left are already throwing infantile tantrums because it's clear that they are not going to get their way.
It really beggars belief that the looser in the Democratic primary race and his obsessed fans think that they can hold out to the bitter end and then march into the Democratic convention and demand what they couldn't accomplish in the primary race by winning the fucking thing.
g) Those of Bernie's rabid supporters on this sub-forum are intellectually bankrupt when it comes to criticisms of Hillary's proposals. So, to make up for their deficiencies and make excuses for their candidate/hero they latch on to conspiracy theories and cry foul at every turn of events. Demonizing Hillary while giving their best efforts in attempting to raise their guy to ultra liberal sainthood.
