Atheist definitions

Atheism, secularism & freethought etc.

Moderators: Blip, reddix, byofrcs

Re: Atheist definitions

 
 

Re: Atheist definitions

#61  Postby ramseyoptom » Dec 30, 2011 5:00 pm

Landrew wrote:The lesson of this thread is how easily the idea of theism or atheism can be conflated with bad behavior.

Neither religion nor atheism has anything to do with committing atrocities, plenty have been committed by both sides with no discernible pattern.

Spirituality is what you believe; religion is when you judge what others believe.


I agree, but in some cases how do you stop these arguments being made? It seems that sooner or later in any thread like this we get either "You're side are responsible for Stalin/Mao etc" or "You're side was responsible for the Crusades/Inquisistion etc". It really doesn't matter who uses which statement first it is a pity in someways that it is used, as after all it is humans being ghastly to other humans with or without religious intent. And it doesn't require the Christian God either just look at the Aztecs they took bloodletting in the name of religion took a new low.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one.
George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
ramseyoptom
 
Name: Ian
Posts: 945
Age: 61
Male

Country: Isle of Man
Isle of Man (im)

Re: Atheist definitions

#62  Postby Landrew » Dec 30, 2011 5:15 pm

ramseyoptom wrote:
Landrew wrote:The lesson of this thread is how easily the idea of theism or atheism can be conflated with bad behavior.

Neither religion nor atheism has anything to do with committing atrocities, plenty have been committed by both sides with no discernible pattern.

Spirituality is what you believe; religion is when you judge what others believe.


I agree, but in some cases how do you stop these arguments being made? It seems that sooner or later in any thread like this we get either "You're side are responsible for Stalin/Mao etc" or "You're side was responsible for the Crusades/Inquisistion etc". It really doesn't matter who uses which statement first it is a pity in someways that it is used, as after all it is humans being ghastly to other humans with or without religious intent. And it doesn't require the Christian God either just look at the Aztecs they took bloodletting in the name of religion took a new low.

You can never stop arguments being made, unless of course you form a religion which forbids it.
It's the duty of a Scientist to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.
User avatar
Landrew
 
Name: greg p
Posts: 764


Re: Atheist definitions

#63  Postby THWOTH » Dec 30, 2011 5:16 pm

Amen.
...drink coffee - live long...

Image
Image
User avatar
THWOTH
RS Donator
 
Name: Penrose
Posts: 16524
Age: 47

Country: ConDemNation
European Union (eur)

Re: Atheist definitions

#64  Postby Grace » Jan 01, 2012 5:01 pm

Landrew, "You can never stop arguments being made." Actually, you can in some instances. About 10 years ago a silly older man used to walk around in front of a hospital with a cardboard plaque attached to his body front and back that read, "Jesus is comming." One day I simply felt I had enough of his nonsense. I walked up to him, pointed my finger in his face and said,
"Jesus already came and went, and you were too prejudice, too stupid, and too stubborn to pay attention. I shook his hand and it was electrifying. His name? Martin Luther King." And with that, I walked away. The next day, the silly old man was gone. I never saw him again.

I cannot tell a lie! I never shook Martin Luther Kings hand, but I shook Jesse Jackson's hand, and yes, it was electrifying. I figured Jesse Jackson must have shook MLK's hand many times, so it's almost the same thing...right? Wrong! It's not logical, but it works.
Grace
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 1484


Re: Atheist definitions

#65  Postby Fallible » Jan 01, 2012 5:04 pm

Umm...
Happy Birthday, Grace!
''At this point, I'd like to remind people that my words are not available for signature use and that any attempt to use them for said purpose will result in legal action instigated by me.'' - Spinozasgalt
User avatar
Fallible
Global Moderator
 
Name: Mud
Posts: 14939
Age: 39
Female

Country: Engerland na na
Canada (ca)

Re: Atheist definitions

#66  Postby chairman bill » Jan 01, 2012 5:10 pm

Grace wrote:Landrew, "You can never stop arguments being made." Actually, you can in some instances. About 10 years ago a silly older man used to walk around in front of a hospital with a cardboard plaque attached to his body front and back that read, "Jesus is comming." One day I simply felt I had enough of his nonsense. I walked up to him, pointed my finger in his face and said,
"Jesus already came and went, and you were too prejudice, too stupid, and too stubborn to pay attention. I shook his hand and it was electrifying. His name? Martin Luther King." And with that, I walked away. The next day, the silly old man was gone. I never saw him again.

I cannot tell a lie! I never shook Martin Luther Kings hand, but I shook Jesse Jackson's hand, and yes, it was electrifying. I figured Jesse Jackson must have shook MLK's hand many times, so it's almost the same thing...right? Wrong! It's not logical, but it works.


I'd have just asked him what 'comming' meant
Image
The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
User avatar
chairman bill
 
Posts: 13069
Male

Country: UK
United Kingdom (uk)

Re: Atheist definitions

#67  Postby Landrew » Jan 01, 2012 5:30 pm

chairman bill wrote:
Grace wrote:Landrew, "You can never stop arguments being made." Actually, you can in some instances. About 10 years ago a silly older man used to walk around in front of a hospital with a cardboard plaque attached to his body front and back that read, "Jesus is comming." One day I simply felt I had enough of his nonsense. I walked up to him, pointed my finger in his face and said,
"Jesus already came and went, and you were too prejudice, too stupid, and too stubborn to pay attention. I shook his hand and it was electrifying. His name? Martin Luther King." And with that, I walked away. The next day, the silly old man was gone. I never saw him again.

I cannot tell a lie! I never shook Martin Luther Kings hand, but I shook Jesse Jackson's hand, and yes, it was electrifying. I figured Jesse Jackson must have shook MLK's hand many times, so it's almost the same thing...right? Wrong! It's not logical, but it works.


I'd have just asked him what 'comming' meant

Remind me never to shake your hand, Grace, without insulated gloves.
It's the duty of a Scientist to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.
User avatar
Landrew
 
Name: greg p
Posts: 764


Re: Atheist definitions

#68  Postby Grace » Jan 01, 2012 9:01 pm

"I'd have just asked him what 'comming' meant"... I think that would be spelled differently.

"Remind me never to shake your hand, Grace, without insulated gloves." What? You don't want to be electrocuted? But it's so good for you. In small doses, it stimulates the immune system and stimulates the production of growth hormones.
Grace
THREAD STARTER
 
Posts: 1484


Re: Atheist definitions

 
 

Re: Atheist definitions

#69  Postby Landrew » Jan 01, 2012 9:20 pm

Grace wrote:"I'd have just asked him what 'comming' meant"... I think that would be spelled differently.

"Remind me never to shake your hand, Grace, without insulated gloves." What? You don't want to be electrocuted? But it's so good for you. In small doses, it stimulates the immune system and stimulates the production of growth hormones.

Almost anything stressful will stimulate the immune system. Most of the time it's not worth it.
It's the duty of a Scientist to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.
User avatar
Landrew
 
Name: greg p
Posts: 764


Previous

Return to Nontheism

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest