because he promotes "Islamaphobia"
Moderators: Blip, DarthHelmet86
felltoearth wrote:And why ask Dawkins what he thinks of Iranian theocracy.
Why not ask actual Iranians?
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/rew ... 27594.html
NamelessFaceless wrote:Dawkins discusses the issue on Fox News:
felltoearth wrote:And citation on your poll claim.
felltoearth wrote:Well, I also know the opinions of my Iranian friends. They love their country but hate the cunts running it.
But you go on believing everyone loves theocratic tyranny.
Wortfish wrote:felltoearth wrote:Well, I also know the opinions of my Iranian friends. They love their country but hate the cunts running it.
But you go on believing everyone loves theocratic tyranny.
You need to realise that Iranians themselves put the current political system in power by referendum following a popular revolution.
proudfootz wrote:
The good, kind people who work here have the final say about how anyone anywhere around the globe shall be governed.
SAVAK (Sazeman-i Ettelaat va Amniyat-i Keshvar) was the National Organization for Intelligence and Security. Formed under the guidance of United States and Israeli intelligence officers in 1957, SAVAK developed into an effective secret agency.
...
SAVAK increasingly to symbolized the Shah's rule from 1963-79, a period of corruption in the royal family, one-party rule, the torture and execution of thousands of political prisoners, suppression of dissent, and alienation of the religious masses. The United States reinforced its position as the Shah's protector and supporter, sowing the seeds of the anti-Americanism that later manifested itself in the revolution against the monarchy.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/wo ... /savak.htm
proudfootz wrote:All in a day's work.
I recall when even people who disagreed with the dictatorship in Iran had to hide their faces even while they were in the USA for fear of what SAVAK* might do to them or their families.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest