Keep It Real wrote:...the idea that believing in no god is a lot more powerful/weapon than merely not believing in god.
You can object to the existence of particular gods and particular works they have wrought on empirical grounds, but you cannot object on the same grounds that some god exists somewhere, no matter how unbelievable the existence of one such is to you. In fact, you cannot disprove the existence of the flying teapot, the spaghetti monster or a unicorn either. No matter how many locations you point to, demonstrating convincingly as you go that none of them exist there, you'll never manage to point to all of them.
Besides, the Christian god - among others - has been defined in such manner that disproof on empirical grounds is impossible.