F16 jetfighter in dogfight with UFOs over Denmark caught on photography, maybe sounds like pure fiction, but there may actually be some truth here, especially when you study the pictures I shot on July 6, 2010 in my hometown Odense city, Denmark. I was out for a walk and had accidentally a camera with me, when I heard the roar of a fighter plane in the skies over me. There were some clouds in the sky that day and I did not make visual contact with the plane, which probably have been a Danish F16 jetfighter. But I could hear it clearly and it sounded as though the pilot up there used afterburner a few times with short intervals and I got the feeling, that he frantically tried to get into position to something up there. In a hurry I grabbed my camera and started shooting photos in the direction where the sound came from. This resulted in 13 images, where 10 of them might be interesting for UFO enthusiasts. See all UFO pictures here: F16 jetfighter in dogfight with UFOs over Denmark?

It's a pimple.

For cereal?!

You "accidentally" had a camera with you?

Regina wrote:It's a pimple.

I'm going with "nipple".

Have they started testing the F35s yet? I know Denmark has contributed to their development (along with Canada).

Wow...are you being serious? I mean, based on your profile I doubt you'll be back, but still...and how did you "accidentally" have a camera with you?

English isn't his first language, and by 'accidentally' he probably means 'just happened to have one with me', i.e. hadn't gone out specifically to photograph UFO dogfights with F16s. I think there's more important stuff here. Like the dust bunnies he's claiming are UFOs.

Edit: typos

Not exactly 'Independence Day' is it?

Well that's a relief.

Couldn't see the plane, but could tell by sound that he was using his afterburner ...

I call shenanigans.

It is much more likely that the writer heard the change in sound from the engine as the aircraft changed orientation in relation to him - sounding louder when pointed away, sounding quieter when pointed towards him.

That's the longest page with the most pictures of nothing I've ever spent a minute scrolling down looking for anything that wasn't bollocks.

felltoearth wrote:Have they started testing the F35s yet? I know Denmark has contributed to their development (along with Canada).

I think Denmark dropped out, but Norway is getting them.


-I suppose these could be images of UFOs (actually they are, as long as they are flying and we don't know what they are), but seriously people, we need better photos. If these were enough to establish UFOs of the extraterrestrial kind, then a grainy image taken two miles away of a brownish blob with a shadow in the outskirts of a forest would be enough to confirm Bigfoot. As it is, these kinds of images are pretty useless IMO.

But hey - welcome to the forum!

F16 jetfighter in dogfight with UFOs over Denmark caught on photography, maybe sounds like pure fiction, but there may actually be some truth here, especially when you study the pictures I shot on July 6, 2010

Are you sure you mean 2010? The picture quality looks more like 1910.

I get that problem too on my DSLR. It just takes a good cleaning to get those off the sensor. I recommned having a professional do it.

Macroinvertebrate wrote:You "accidentally" had a camera with you?

Generally, I always have a camera with me when the weather is fine, and in that period, I was just started to have it with me, when I was out. I also always have my little camcorder with me...

ElDiablo wrote:I get that problem too on my DSLR. It just takes a good cleaning to get those off the sensor. I recommned having a professional do it.

I know everything about dust on both the lens and the CCD, and this is not dust. Some of the objects could be insects, but not all of them. Take for example object B., that jumps around in the sky with only 2 sec. intervals...

Spearthrower wrote:

F16 jetfighter in dogfight with UFOs over Denmark caught on photography, maybe sounds like pure fiction, but there may actually be some truth here, especially when you study the pictures I shot on July 6, 2010

Are you sure you mean 2010? The picture quality looks more like 1910.

You know, when you can´t see any objects and just take photos sporadic of the airspace, you can´t expect focused objects. If I saw the objects and had a change to focus and zoom in on it, it would have been nice.

No matter what you think, the objects are there, and sorry for that...

chairman bill wrote:English isn't his first language, and by 'accidentally' he probably means 'just happened to have one with me', i.e. hadn't gone out specifically to photograph UFO dogfights with F16s. I think there's more important stuff here. Like the dust bunnies he's claiming are UFOs.

Edit: typos

I know everything about dust, both on the lens and the CCD, so please don´t try that on me, because it will not work. The objects are there, everyone can see that, but some of them could be insects...

Thanks for the english lesson

Freespirit,
With only one eyewitness testimony and photos of out of focus shapes, what would you like our response to be?
Also why post this here over 1 1/2 years after it happened?